In 2025, students in grades 7–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 7–8 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 7–8: 692 in English, 691 in math
Comparison
692 students in English and 691 in math in grades 7–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
42% in English and 53% in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 19% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
42%English · exceeded the standard53%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 7 and 8: 819 in English, 824 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 838,600 in English and 838,896 in math tested).
Low-income students here (302 tested in English, 305 in math, grades 7 and 8, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (39% and 26%).grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
62%English · met or exceeded47%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 7 and 8: 302 in English, 305 in math
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 302 students in English and 305 in math.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8
Thomas RussellCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID76%50%
Thomas RussellCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8
Thomas RussellCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID68%37%
Thomas RussellCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English was 76% in both 2017 and 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Math went from 72% in 2017 to 68% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year
Thomas Russell
California
2015
69% 817 tested
45% 900,059 tested
2016
78% 843 tested
48% 907,715 tested
2017
76% 803 tested
49% 915,271 tested
2018
78% 777 tested
50% 919,277 tested
2019
81% 805 tested
50% 932,985 tested
2022
75% 716 tested
48% 852,094 tested
2023
79% 767 tested
47% 842,173 tested
2024
78% 751 tested
47% 849,026 tested
2025
77% 739 tested
49% 848,364 tested
2026
76% 819 tested
50% 838,600 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year
Thomas Russell
California
2015
65% 819 tested
33% 901,801 tested
2016
72% 854 tested
36% 910,145 tested
2017
72% 815 tested
37% 918,964 tested
2018
74% 776 tested
37% 921,089 tested
2019
76% 809 tested
37% 935,223 tested
2022
68% 715 tested
31% 853,132 tested
2023
71% 776 tested
32% 844,737 tested
2024
69% 767 tested
33% 853,781 tested
2025
68% 741 tested
35% 851,806 tested
2026
68% 824 tested
37% 838,896 tested
The state’s growth measure692 students in English, 691 in math · grades 7–8 · 2025
English+6ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+16ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 6 points above that prediction, and in math 16 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
8 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
9in 100 at the average Milpitas Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
73 of 855 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school8 in 100
at the average Milpitas Unified school9 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
3.4%of students were suspended at least once (29 of 861), 2025–26
2.3%at the average Milpitas Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Thomas Russell works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Thomas Russell. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
302 English · 305 math tested
English
62% / 39%
Math
47% / 26%
Asian
490 English · 496 math tested
English
89% / 76%
Math
85% / 71%
Hispanic or Latino
123 tested per subject
English
33% / 40%
Math
14% / 25%
Filipino
105 English · 106 math tested
English
76% / 74%
Math
52% / 60%
Two or more races
57 tested per subject
English
81% / 63%
Math
72% / 50%
English learners
74 English · 81 math tested
English
12% / 7%
Math
20% / 7%
Students with disabilities
59 tested per subject
English
10% / 14%
Math
5% / 9%
Low-income students here did far better than the same group statewide. Hispanic or Latino students did worse than the same group statewide in math.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Milpitas Unified
vs California
Low-income · 302 tested in English, 305 in math
English
62%
+359%
■+2339%
Math
47%
+443%
■+2126%
Asian · 490 tested in English, 496 in math
English
89%
+188%
+1376%
Math
85%
+283%
+1471%
Hispanic or Latino · 123 tested
English
33%
−437%
−740%
Math
14%
−418%
−1125%
Filipino · 105 tested in English, 106 in math
English
76%
+274%
+274%
Math
52%
052%
−860%
Two or more races · 57 tested
English
81%
+774%
+1863%
Math
72%
+1062%
+2250%
English learners · 74 tested in English, 81 in math
English
12%
−113%
+57%
Math
20%
+119%
■+137%
Students with disabilities · 59 tested
English
10%
−515%
−414%
Math
5%
−510%
−49%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Milpitas Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
White students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian59%
2Hispanic or Latino16%
3Filipino13%
4Two or more races5%
5White4%
6Black or African American1%
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share2%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
59%
Hispanic or Latino
16%
Filipino
13%
Two or more races
5%
White
4%
Black or African American
1%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 2 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (39%, 295 of 761). California: 63%.
90% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 90.28%: 30.4 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 33.7 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
56%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school56%
Milpitas Unified52%
California47%
43 of 77 English learners here; 686 of 1,309 in Milpitas Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Milpitas High. UC records 104 enrollees from Milpitas High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 21 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Milpitas High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 83% of Milpitas High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Thomas Russell Middle is in the 95th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 75 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Thomas Russell Middle was well above California in English and math: 76% and 68% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Thomas Russell Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 76% of students tested in grades 7 and 8 met or exceeded the English standard and 68% the math standard; 42% and 53% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 50% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 819 students were tested in English and 824 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Thomas Russell Middle rank in California?
Thomas Russell Middle is in the 95th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Strong, 2026). Thomas Russell Middle ranks #102 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Thomas Russell Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 8.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 73 chronically absent of 855 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 3.4%; 29 unduplicated suspended students of 861 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Thomas Russell Middle compare to other schools in Milpitas?
Thomas Russell Middle is in the 95th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 761 students. Use the schools in Milpitas page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Thomas Russell Middle?
At Thomas Russell Middle in Milpitas, 62% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 7–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 59% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 3 points above the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 47% in math; Asian students, 89% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 302 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Thomas Russell Middle feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Thomas Russell Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Milpitas High. Milpitas High is in the 85th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↑ vs CA 17.7% · index 83 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 76 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 63 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.7pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.8% · index 52 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.1pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 53 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 7
436
45%
33%
9%
13%
78%
51%
+27
Grade 8
383
39%
36%
10%
15%
75%
49%
+26
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 7
437
55%
17%
13%
15%
72%
38%
+34
Grade 8
387
50%
13%
15%
22%
63%
36%
+27
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
389
76.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
350
76.9%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
391
69.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
350
67.4%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
339
77.9%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
412
77.7%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
347
67.4%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
420
70.0%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
401
79.3%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
366
78.1%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
407
72.0%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
369
69.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
358
73.2%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
358
76.3%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
358
71.2%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
357
64.7%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
419
82.6%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
386
79.8%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
422
81.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
387
70.8%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
386
79.8%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
391
76.7%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
—
—
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
384
72.1%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
392
75.5%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
393
78.1%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
410
73.9%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
399
69.4%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
416
73.8%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
406
80%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
437
76%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
414
68%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
440
76%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
423
69%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
394
68%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
425
64%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
394
66%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
386
40%
24%
25%
11%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
302
62%
+3
+23
Asian
490
89%
+1
+12
Hispanic/Latino
123
33%
−4
−7
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
5.0%
2.8%
—
2022
—
—
—
9.0%
5.3%
—
2023
—
—
—
12.6%
2.7%
—
2024
—
—
—
9.7%
2.9%
—
2025
—
—
—
9.4%
3.5%
—
2026
75
95
#102
8.7%
3.4%
—
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
— The same-year grade contrast is unavailable in this record; it is separate from the two-year aggregate comparison used for scoring.
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
4.2%
6.8%
+2.6pp
Male
5.5%
10.1%
+4.6pp
Asian
2.0%
2.0%
+0.0pp
Black/African American
21.4%
41.7%
+20.3pp
Filipino
3.1%
8.0%
+4.9pp
Hispanic/Latino
11.3%
28.6%
+17.3pp
Two or More Races
3.4%
12.8%
+9.4pp
White
5.1%
3.3%
-1.8pp
Students with Disabilities
12.2%
30.7%
+18.5pp
English Learners
6.3%
13.3%
+7.0pp
Homeless
11.1%
46.7%
+35.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
9.9%
15.3%
+5.4pp
All Students
4.9%
8.5%
+3.6pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+6
692
Accelerated
+16
691
Accelerated
Asian
+6
397
Accelerated
+27
397
Exceptional
English Only
+8
310
not categorised
+10
309
not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+1
272
Average
+6
271
Accelerated
English Learner
−4
175
Average
+15
175
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
0
120
not categorised
+20
120
not categorised
Hispanic or Latino
+1
113
Average
−11
112
Moderate
Filipino
+13
85
Accelerated
+15
85
Accelerated
English Learners Only
−6
55
not categorised
+6
55
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
−3
54
Average
−1
54
Average
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
−4
40
Average
−5
40
Average
White
+11
38
Accelerated
+18
38
Accelerated
Two or More Races
+11
36
Accelerated
+13
36
Accelerated
Black or African American
+10
14
Accelerated
−12
14
Moderate
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
692 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 67th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.67th pctile · +6 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
691 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 87th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.87th pctile · +16 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$12,354 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 10,413 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$51 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 761
Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,025 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 761
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,174 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 64%Instruction support 16%Student services 6%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 8%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95035+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95035
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$178,654
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
58.19%
ZCTA population
78,810
Median age
36.8 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95035 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.