ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Westborough Middle · South San Francisco

Westborough Middle: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But suspensions run the state rate.

Westborough has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4843
% Exceeded24%17%
% Met+54%39%
Growth+6.5+1.5
Absence9.6%18.5%
Suspension7.8%3.7%
Scope Score
48
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #733 statewide · #1 of 3 in South San Francisco Unified

Westborough Middle scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 67th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. Westborough deserves a closer read. The school sits in South San Francisco, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 40.6% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 85th to the 67th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 54% meet the standard today, versus 65% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 665%47%58%57%57%
Grade 768%63%62%60%64%
Grade 873%66%65%52%60%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 661%55%52%49%43%
Grade 764%61%58%55%49%
Grade 858%51%59%47%53%

The story this school is actually telling

The on-ramp · English learner progress
40.6%

of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

↑ how fast newcomers reach fluency
The catch · suspensions
7.8%

of students were suspended, versus 3.7% statewide — worth asking about on a tour.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
37%
43%
Grade 6 · 57% proficient
22%
42%
36%
Grade 7 · 64% proficient
23%
37%
40%
Grade 8 · 60% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.6pp across grades; the floor rises 2.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
24.1%
State 16.8%
7.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+6.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
54.2%
State 39.3%
15.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
9.6%
State 18.5%
8.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
7.8%
State 3.7%
4.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
40.6%
State 18.0%
22.7pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask about the discipline philosophy and what a typical suspension is for. Numbers can't tell you whether a campus feels strict or chaotic — a visit can.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Westborough Middle in South San Francisco, 44.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Westborough Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.7% Math proficient); Filipino students (65.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 55.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested.

All students at this school: 54% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 54%, district —, state 39%54%
FemaleFemale: this school 59%, district 47%, state 44%59% · +5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 50%, district 43%, state 42%50% · −5 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 56%, district 62%, state 65%56% · +1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 43%, district 28%, state 32%43% · −12 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 73%, district 75%, state 72%73% · +19 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 26%, state 32%33% · −21 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 12%, state 15%6% · −48 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 56%, district 54%, state 56%56% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 8%, state 11%9% · −45 vs school

6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.6%, district 16.9%, state 18.5%9.6% · −8.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 7.8%, district —, state 3.7%7.8% · +4.1pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (11.4% vs 5.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.0%
Grades 7–811.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 17:1, district 20:117:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience11.3 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,889 – $125,220
Principal salary$164,251 – $224,372
Superintendent salary$323,369

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,505, CA average $14,815$22,505 · spent at this school
Federal share$902 per student

$902 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,037 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support11%
Student services13%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance12%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,807 per pupil
2019$13,331 per pupil
2018$13,184 per pupil
2017$12,036 per pupil
2016$11,397 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Other44.8%
District 28.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian27.1%
District 15.3% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic21.7%
District 48.6% · CA 56.1%
White5.4%
District 6.3% · CA 19.9%
Black1.0%
District 1.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 27.3% (36pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$137K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.19M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population64,761
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 53% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Westborough Middle a good middle school?

Westborough Middle has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100, placing it in the 67th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #733 statewide. 24.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.3 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Westborough Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 54.2% of students at Westborough Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 24.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 24.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 956 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Westborough Middle rank in California?

Westborough Middle ranks #733 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 67th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Westborough Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Westborough Middle increases by 6.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Westborough Middle?

9.6% of students at Westborough Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 7.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Westborough Middle compare to other schools in South San Francisco?

Westborough Middle scores 48/100 (67th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 498 students. Use the schools in South San Francisco page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Westborough Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Westborough Middle in South San Francisco, 44.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Westborough Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.7% Math proficient); Filipino students (65.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 55.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 135 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
24.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 58th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+6.5pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 40th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
54.2%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 62th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
9.6%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 63th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
7.8%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 33th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
40.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 76th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 615520%37%24%19%57%+10
Grade 717722%42%14%22%64%+16
Grade 814623%37%21%20%60%+14
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 615523%21%34%23%43%+8
Grade 717722%27%27%25%49%+15
Grade 814636%18%11%36%53%+21
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1114623%30%35%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13544.4%+12+6
Filipino16065.6%−2−7
Asian13474.6%−3+0
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Westborough Middle ←4824.1%54.2%+6.57.8%
Ingrid B. Lacy Middle1.8 mi4824.9%53.0%−5.33.6%
Alta Loma Middle1.3 mi4521.2%42.5%−3.11.9%
Fernando Rivera Intermediate2.7 mi4317.7%46.7%−2.51.8%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195885#29832.2%64.8%7.6%7.5%+2.6pp
20225583#36222.5%57.1%21.2%6.6%+7.5pp
20235984#34426.0%58.9%16.5%8.8%+6.6pp
20244973#59324.2%53.5%11.4%11.0%-3.3pp
20254867#73324.1%54.2%9.6%7.8%+6.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.6%10.8%+4.2pp
Male8.4%7.9%-0.5pp
Asian0.8%1.5%+0.7pp
White2.5%7.3%+4.8pp
Hispanic/Latino17.4%18.6%+1.2pp
Two or More Races11.8%6.7%-5.1pp
Students with Disabilities21.1%30.3%+9.2pp
English Learners3.2%18.8%+15.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.9%20.4%+8.5pp
All Students7.6%9.3%+1.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction