ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Warm Springs Middle · Murrieta

Warm Springs Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Warm Springs posts 48% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

39245 Calle de Fortuna, 92563 (opens in new tab)·Murrieta Valley Unified·Murrieta·Grades 6-8·755 students·63% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 696-3503·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4543
% Exceeded18%17%
% Met+48%39%
Growth-2.4+1.5
Absence17.6%18.5%
Suspension5.0%3.7%
Scope Score
45
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #914 statewide · #5 of 5 in Murrieta Valley Unified

Warm Springs Middle scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 59th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “48% proficient” and call it done. Warm Springs deserves a closer read. The school sits in Murrieta, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 39.0% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 59th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 48% meet the standard today, versus 51% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 659%59%47%56%50%
Grade 770%57%61%54%60%
Grade 861%62%60%62%51%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 642%42%39%43%45%
Grade 742%37%41%39%42%
Grade 834%34%35%41%39%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
35%
50%
Grade 6 · 50% proficient
22%
38%
40%
Grade 7 · 60% proficient
15%
36%
49%
Grade 8 · 51% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
18.2%
State 16.8%
1.4pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-2.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
47.9%
State 39.3%
8.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.6%
State 18.5%
0.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
5.0%
State 3.7%
1.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
39.0%
State 18.0%
21.0pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Warm Springs Middle in Murrieta, 47.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 56.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Warm Springs Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 8.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 53.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 455 students tested.

All students at this school: 48% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 48%, district —, state 39%48%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 48%, state 32%41% · −7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 45%, district 55%, state 42%45% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 51%, district 56%, state 44%51% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 42%, district 48%, state 32%42% · −6 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 53%, district 62%, state 56%53% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 24%, state 15%12% · −36 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 47%, district 59%, state 56%47% · −1 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 51%, district 58%, state 46%51% · +3 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 33%, district 41%, state 26%33% · −15 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 77%, district 75%, state 72%77% · +29 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 18%, state 11%9% · −39 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 86%, district 70%, state 65%86% · +38 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.6%, district 18.9%, state 18.5%17.6% · −0.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.0%, district —, state 3.7%5.0% · +1.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.5%
Grades 7–818.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 24:122:1
Teaching staff35 teachers
Avg. experience13.9 years
Fully credentialed80%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,327 – $146,910
Principal salary$171,292 – $193,801
Superintendent salary$346,925

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,637, CA average $14,815$17,637 · spent at this school
Federal share$45 per student

$45 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,831 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support9%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,094 per pupil
2019$11,339 per pupil
2018$11,338 per pupil
2017$10,906 per pupil
2016$10,253 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic47.4%
District 43.3% · CA 56.1%
White24.9%
District 32.8% · CA 19.9%
Other16.3%
District 14.7% · CA 9.0%
Black6.1%
District 5.2% · CA 4.8%
Asian5.3%
District 4.1% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 62.9% (1pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$125K · CA $85K
Median home value$646K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+34% · CA 35%
ZIP population80,379
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 49% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Warm Springs Middle a good middle school?

Warm Springs Middle has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 59th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #914 statewide. 18.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Warm Springs Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 47.9% of students at Warm Springs Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 29.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,451 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Warm Springs Middle rank in California?

Warm Springs Middle ranks #914 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 59th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Warm Springs Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Warm Springs Middle decreases by 2.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Warm Springs Middle?

17.6% of students at Warm Springs Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Warm Springs Middle compare to other schools in Murrieta?

Warm Springs Middle scores 45/100 (59th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 755 students. Use the schools in Murrieta page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Warm Springs Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Warm Springs Middle in Murrieta, 47.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 56.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Warm Springs Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 8.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 53.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 455 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
18.2%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 52th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-2.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
47.9%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 57th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.6%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
5.0%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 45th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
39.0%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 74th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 623615%35%28%22%50%+3
Grade 724022%38%25%15%60%+13
Grade 825015%36%28%21%51%+5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 623721%24%34%21%45%+10
Grade 723819%23%26%32%42%+8
Grade 825018%21%23%38%39%+7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1125020%29%48%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged45547.0%−9+9
Hispanic/Latino34747.5%−9+9
White17759.9%−9−2
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Warm Springs Middle ←4518.2%47.9%−2.45.0%
James L. Day Middle1.7 mi5625.8%57.1%+9.73.8%
Margarita Middle2.8 mi3616.9%38.7%−0.15.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194360#81022.1%51.3%10.4%4.9%-2.5pp
20224365#75220.8%48.7%27.9%6.5%-2.4pp
20234969#67118.6%46.9%23.4%5.5%+4.7pp
20244566#75818.4%49.3%19.0%4.7%+2.0pp
20254559#91418.2%47.9%17.6%5.0%-2.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.8%20.3%+9.5pp
Male10.1%15.0%+4.9pp
Asian0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Black/African American3.2%16.7%+13.5pp
White7.7%8.6%+0.9pp
Hispanic/Latino12.1%16.3%+4.2pp
Two or More Races9.4%23.3%+13.9pp
Students with Disabilities16.9%27.1%+10.2pp
English Learners15.9%19.6%+3.7pp
Foster Youth18.8%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.5%19.4%+5.9pp
All Students10.4%17.6%+7.2pp
Filipino23.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction