English
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 87 tested
- Advanced
- 24%
- Proficient
- 28%
- Below the standard
- 48%
52% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
Public school · Los Angeles Unified · Los Angeles, California
Los Angeles · TK–5 · 217 students (2024–25)
The dots are California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built →
Weighted composite · 2025–26
A weighted mix of five of the six elementary school measures.
Near California in English, well above in math: 52% and 61% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5, spring 2026, against 46% and 42%.
From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).
Choose up to four elementary schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Virginia Road Elementary’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap
The California School Campus Database records City Language Immersion Charter on this campus too; it gives each school the whole campus, so this drawing doesn’t show which buildings each uses.
Drawn from OpenStreetMap, with building heights from LA County. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 36% of students tested in math scored Advanced, against 21% across California. Advanced is the top of the state’s four levels.
If Virginia Road is the school for your address, you don’t apply: you register with LAUSD. Check which school serves your address first. Evidence ↓
Virginia Road Elementary scores higher than 77 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools: 77th percentile, Strong, spring 2026. Evidence ↓
In 2025–26, 25 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 20 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school. 0 of 220 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. Evidence ↓
In English, about as expected; in math, yes. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored 0 points against the state’s expected score in English, which the state calls Average. In math, they scored +30 points, which it calls Exceptional.
In spring 2026, 52% of low-income students in grades 3–5 at Virginia Road Elementary in Los Angeles scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 36% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓
91% of families agreed or strongly agreed with “My child is safe on school grounds” (LAUSD elementary schools 91%, 86 answered).
By the district’s published 2026 attendance boundaries, Virginia Road Elementary is zoned to Johnnie Cochran, Jr., Middle. Boundaries change, are approximate at the edges and don’t guarantee placement, so confirm your address with the district.
The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓
Academic achievement
Above California in English; well above it in math.
State tests (CAASPP), spring 2026
In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 52% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 61% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 87 tested
52% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 87 tested
61% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 50% | 55% | 50% |
| Advanced | 31% | 26% | 17% |
| Proficient | 19% | 29% | 33% |
| Developing level | 19% | 29% | 23% |
| Minimal | 31% | 16% | 27% |
| Tested | 26 | 31 | 30 |
| California | 44% | 46% | 49% |
| Difference | +6 | +9 | +1 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 58% | 71% | 53% |
| Advanced | 42% | 35% | 30% |
| Proficient | 16% | 36% | 23% |
| Developing level | 19% | 23% | 20% |
| Minimal | 23% | 6% | 27% |
| Tested | 26 | 31 | 30 |
| California | 47% | 42% | 37% |
| Difference | +11 | +29 | +16 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →
English results were higher than in 2025; math results were similar. English went from 47% to 52% and math from 57% to 61%.
This school
California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested
This school
California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested
Each year is a different group of students.
In English, about as expected; in math, yes. California sets an expected score for each student from that student’s own score the year before. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored 0 points against that expected score in English, which the state calls Average. In math, they scored +30 points, which it calls Exceptional.
Grades 4 and 5 · 2025 · 53 students in English, 54 in math, with scores in both years
Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.
0 pts
The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.
+30 pts
The state calls it Exceptional, the highest of its five growth levels.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 3–5 · This school | 24% | 28% | 24% | 24% | 87 |
| English, grades 3–5 · California | 24% | 22% | 21% | 33% | 1,208,894 |
| English, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified | 23% | 23% | 22% | 32% | 108,229 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · This school | 36% | 25% | 21% | 18% | 87 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · California | 21% | 21% | 25% | 33% | 1,211,701 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified | 22% | 22% | 25% | 31% | 108,401 |
Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Chart and table: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year.
The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.
2026 was the highest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.
| Year | This school | California |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 25% 185 tested | 45% 1,384,680 tested |
| 2018 | 32% 160 tested | 49% 1,346,907 tested |
| 2019 | 31% 149 tested | 50% 1,332,547 tested |
| 2022 | 32% 97 tested | 45% 1,260,830 tested |
| 2023 | 40% 96 tested | 44% 1,247,801 tested |
| 2024 | 38% 90 tested | 45% 1,235,509 tested |
| 2025 | 47% 92 tested | 46% 1,232,086 tested |
| 2026 | 52% 87 tested | 46% 1,208,894 tested |
| Year | This school | California |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20% 182 tested | 40% 1,392,040 tested |
| 2018 | 24% 159 tested | 42% 1,352,321 tested |
| 2019 | 23% 149 tested | 44% 1,338,625 tested |
| 2022 | 23% 97 tested | 38% 1,265,943 tested |
| 2023 | 39% 96 tested | 40% 1,256,519 tested |
| 2024 | 48% 92 tested | 41% 1,249,262 tested |
| 2025 | 57% 93 tested | 41% 1,241,652 tested |
| 2026 | 61% 87 tested | 42% 1,211,701 tested |
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored right at that expected score, and in math 30 points above it.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Life at school
25 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26.
State attendance and suspension records, 2025–26
That means they missed 10% or more of school days. At the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school, 20 in 100 were. 0 of 220 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school.
53 of 213 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.
0 of 220
students were suspended at least once. Average California elementary school 1.6%.
Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
What people say
LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26
60 of 60 students answered (100%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise
| Question | Here | LAUSD elementary schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 77% | 77% | 60 |
| Belonging | |||
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 80% | 78% | 59 |
| I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 69% | 74% | 58 |
| I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 78% | 72% | 59 |
| I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 67% | 72% | 58 |
| Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 28% | 42% | 58 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 85% | 78% | 59 |
| The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 72% | 69% | 57 |
| Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 70% | 70% | 56 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 76% | 73% | 59 |
| There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 73% | 71% | 59 |
| There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 76% | 80% | 59 |
| Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 83% | 78% | 59 |
| If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 85% | 79% | 60 |
| Engagement | |||
| Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 85% | 81% | 59 |
| My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 71% | 67% | 58 |
| Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 58% | 55% | 59 |
| Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 74% | 72% | 58 |
| There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 83% | 74% | 59 |
| I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 66% | 59% | 59 |
| High expectations | |||
| In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 95% | 88% | 59 |
| Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 88% | 81% | 59 |
| Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days | |||
| Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it | 42% | 31% | 60 |
| Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it | 30% | 30% | 60 |
| Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it | 30% | 25% | 59 |
| Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it | 10% | 12% | 60 |
| Other questions | |||
| The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 83% | 82% | 59 |
| Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 53% | 54% | 60 |
| Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 84% | 80% | 58 |
| What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree” | — | — | 0 |
| I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true” | 83% | 78% | 59 |
| I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true” | 80% | 75% | 59 |
| I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true” | 83% | 74% | 59 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 72% | 64% | 60 |
| I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident” | 64% | 61% | 59 |
| I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident” | 56% | 49% | 59 |
| I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident” | 76% | 65% | 59 |
| I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time” | 77% | 72% | 60 |
| I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time” | 80% | 75% | 60 |
| I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time” | 62% | 56% | 60 |
| How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well” | 63% | 72% | 60 |
| When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful” | 77% | 70% | 60 |
| How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully” | 83% | 78% | 60 |
“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.
Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)
100 of 165 family surveys came back (61%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise
| Question | Here | LAUSD elementary schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 91% | 91% | 86 |
| Belonging | |||
| Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 92% | 98 |
| Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 99% | 96% | 98 |
| I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 98% | 94% | 87 |
| I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 97% | 94% | 100 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 98% | 94% | 98 |
| Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 99% | 95% | 98 |
| Engagement | |||
| This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 94% | 99 |
| This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 98% | 89% | 100 |
| This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 91% | 91% | 98 |
| Bullying reports taken seriously | |||
| Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 89% | 80% | 93 |
| Other questions | |||
| Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 86% | 89% | 98 |
| Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 91% | 90% | 98 |
| Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 94% | 98 |
| Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 89% | 85% | 97 |
| I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 99% | 91% | 97 |
| This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 85% | 79% | 100 |
| This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 89% | 100 |
| This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 87% | 100 |
| This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 93% | 92% | 100 |
| I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 95% | 91% | 100 |
| I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 95% | 97 |
| I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 87% | 98 |
| I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 88% | 96 |
| This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 95% | 95% | 99 |
| School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 96% | 87% | 74 |
| This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 99% | 91% | 88 |
| This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 97% | 91% | 87 |
| I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 91% | 91% | 97 |
| This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 86% | 100 |
| I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 92% | 83% | 82 |
| I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 92% | 88% | 78 |
| My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 98% | 92% | 97 |
| Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 87% | 82% | 97 |
Each share counts the answer its row names.
Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)
35 of 35 staff answered (100%), 14 of them teachers · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise
| Question | Here | LAUSD elementary schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe on school grounds during the dayShare giving one of the two most positive answers | 97% | 97% | 35 |
| Caring adults | |||
| At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 77% | 84% | 35 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 94% | 34 |
| High expectations | |||
| This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 95% | 35 |
| This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 95% | 35 |
| Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem | |||
| Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem | 91% | 86% | 35 |
| Other questions | |||
| I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 86% | 84% | 35 |
| Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 71% | 84% | 35 |
| I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 74% | 81% | 35 |
| The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 94% | 95% | 35 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolShare giving one of the two most positive answers | 94% | 88% | 35 |
| At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed | 89% | 85% | 35 |
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 85% | 82% | 34 |
| This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 74% | 75% | 35 |
| How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults” | 91% | 86% | 35 |
| How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults” | 79% | 80% | 33 |
| Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 86% | 81% | 35 |
| This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 77% | 80% | 35 |
| This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed | 74% | 75% | 35 |
| Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem | 97% | 93% | 34 |
| The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 75% | 14 |
| During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year” | — | — | 9 |
| I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 75% | 8 |
| I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 84% | 8 |
| I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 86% | 8 |
| I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 88% | 3 |
| Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly” | — | 16% | 14 |
| With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly” | — | 50% | 14 |
| Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly” | — | 59% | 14 |
| Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more” | — | 51% | 14 |
| Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more” | — | 66% | 14 |
| I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 79% | 14 |
| I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 79% | 14 |
| I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 94% | 14 |
| I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 91% | 14 |
| What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 74% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 74% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 71% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 75% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 77% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 81% | 14 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 76% | 14 |
| I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed | — | 88% | 14 |
“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.
Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Virginia Road works for your family.
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolWork here? Answer 8 questions about Virginia Road as a workplace, with your Los Angeles Unified work email.
Answer the staff questionsAsk: Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?
Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades.
LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group only when at least 10% of it responded, so the answers speak for more than the few who chose to reply.
Each row shows the percentage its label describes. For a theme, such as one marked “average of 5 questions”, we average the percentages for its questions, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. Each lane lists every question with its own percentage.
Every learner
Hispanic or Latino and low-income students here scored well above the same groups across California.
Student groups, grades 3–5, spring 2026
Both groups score below California’s rate for all students statewide. 58% of Hispanic or Latino students scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 72% in math (grades 3–5, spring 2026), against 36% and 31% for the same group across California. Low-income students: 52% in English and 60% in math, against 36% and 31% for the same group across California.
Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–5, spring 2026.
63% of English learners here moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026.
Spring 2025 to spring 2026 · English learners with state English test (ELPAC) scores in both years
It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
95%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 207 of 217. California: 63%.
13teachers, 2024–25
11 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25
15%in their first year, 2024–25
95%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22
Ask: How does the school keep Hispanic or Latino and low-income students on track as they move up through the grades?
| Group and subject | Here | vs Los Angeles Unified | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 85 tested | |||
| English | 52% | +1240% | +1636% |
| Math | 60% | +2139% | +2931% |
| Hispanic or Latino · 60 tested | |||
| English | 58% | +1741% | +2236% |
| Math | 72% | +3339% | +4131% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind across California does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Black or African American students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
| Students, 2025–26 | Here |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 67% |
| Black or African American | 30% |
| White | — |
| Asian | — |
| Filipino | — |
| Two or more races | — |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 95% of teaching positions, 10.5 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 11 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Next steps
Johnnie Cochran, Jr., Middle, then Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High.
Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.
From the district’s 2026 attendance boundaries. A boundary doesn’t guarantee placement: transfers, permits, magnets and Choices can change the path. Check your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Explore schools on the map
Assigned
14th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026
Assigned
6th percentile · Needs Support · high · 2025
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High. UC records 6 enrollees from Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 11 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High around 2036, and a school can change a lot in 10 years. By the state’s 2023 count, 46% of the students who finished high school at Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High enrolled in college within 12 months, UC or not.
Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.
If Virginia Road is the school for your address, you don’t apply: you register with LAUSD. Check which school serves your address first.
On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026 and join the end of the waitlist.
Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm which school serves your address with Los Angeles Unified.
Office (323) 735-05702925 Virginia Road, directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
The closest elementary schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 30% | 58 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 56% | 60 | 23% |
| Chronically absent | 25 in 100 | 39 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0 of 220 | 62 | 5% |
| English learners: top level | 40% | 81 | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -2.2pp | — | not scored |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 80%: the remaining 20%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 51 | 77 | #1283 | California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 23 in 100 | 0.3% (1 of 334) | +5 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | −13 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | −12 |
| 2023–24 | 28 in 100 | 0 of 239 | −5 |
| 2024–25 | 28 in 100 | 0.8% (2 of 239) | −7 |
| 2025–26 | 25 in 100 | 0 of 220 | −2 |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 87 | 24% | 52% |
| 2026 · Math | 87 | 36% | 61% |
| 2025 · English | 92 | 15% | 47% |
| 2025 · Math | 93 | 24% | 57% |
| 2024 · English | 90 | 13% | 38% |
| 2024 · Math | 92 | 17% | 48% |
| 2023 · English | 96 | 20% | 40% |
| 2023 · Math | 96 | 14% | 39% |
| 2022 · English | 97 | 9% | 32% |
| 2022 · Math | 97 | 5% | 23% |
| 2019 · English | 149 | 13% | 31% |
| 2019 · Math | 149 | 5% | 23% |
| 2018 · English | 160 | 13% | 32% |
| 2018 · Math | 159 | 7% | 24% |
| 2017 · English | 185 | 10% | 25% |
| 2017 · Math | 182 | 5% | 20% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 3 · English | 32 | 53% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · English | 32 | 38% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · English | 28 | 50% |
| 2025 · Grade 3 · Math | 32 | 66% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · Math | 32 | 50% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · Math | 29 | 55% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · English | 34 | 29% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · English | 26 | 38% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · English | 30 | 47% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · Math | 34 | 65% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · Math | 28 | 39% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · Math | 30 | 37% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · English | 25 | 36% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · English | 38 | 58% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · English | 33 | 21% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · Math | 25 | 36% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · Math | 38 | 50% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · Math | 33 | 27% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · English | 38 | 37% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · English | 33 | 27% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · English | 26 | 31% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · Math | 38 | 32% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · Math | 33 | 21% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · Math | 26 | 12% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · English | 58 | 28% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · English | 43 | 23% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · English | 48 | 42% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · Math | 58 | 31% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · Math | 43 | 7% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · Math | 48 | 27% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · English | 47 | 30% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · English | 52 | 29% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · English | 61 | 38% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · Math | 47 | 38% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · Math | 52 | 19% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · Math | 60 | 17% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · English | 53 | 21% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · English | 68 | 31% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · English | 64 | 23% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · Math | 53 | 26% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · Math | 66 | 23% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · Math | 63 | 11% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 30 | 10% | 10% | 70% | 10% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 85 | 52% | +12 | +16 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 60 | 58% | +17 | +22 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 0 | 53 | Average | +30 | 54 | Exceptional |
| Low-income | −1 | 51 | Average | +27 | 52 | Exceptional |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 39 | Average | +33 | 39 | Exceptional |
| English-only students | −6 | 32 | not categorized | +19 | 33 | not categorized |
| English learners | −3 | 15 | Average | +39 | 15 | Exceptional |
| Black or African American | −5 | 13 | Average | +11 | 14 | Accelerated |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
State model · English0 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4 and 5California growth model, English: 0 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Average, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.State model · math+30 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4 and 5California growth model, math: +30 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Exceptional, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 28 in 100 → 2025–26 · 25 in 100 · −3 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 0.8% (2 of 239) → 2025–26 · 0 of 220 · −0.8 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 19 in 100 | 20 in 100 | +1 in 100 |
| Male | 27 in 100 | 29 in 100 | +2 in 100 |
| Black or African American | 33 in 100 | 43 in 100 | +10 in 100 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 18 in 100 | 18 in 100 | 0 in 100 |
| Students with disabilities | 31 in 100 | 36 in 100 | +5 in 100 |
| English learners | 18 in 100 | 17 in 100 | −1 in 100 |
| Foster youth | 9 in 100 | — | — |
| Homeless | 23 in 100 | — | — |
| Low-income | 23 in 100 | 26 in 100 | +3 in 100 |
| All students | 23 in 100 | 25 in 100 | +2 in 100 |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 217
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 217
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $5,655,379,384 | 51.81% | 52% |
| Instruction support | $1,791,152,348 | 16.41% | 17% |
| Student services | $1,344,873,232 | 12.32% | 12% |
| Administration | $763,652,780 | 7.00% | 7% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $1,099,649,062 | 10.07% | 10% |
| Other | $260,356,595 | 2.39% | 2% |
| Total | $10,915,063,400 | 100.00% | 100% |
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $73,516 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 33% |
| ZIP-area population | 46,457 |
| Median age | 36.3 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 90016 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated October 15, 2026
How we analyze · Request a correction
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.