ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Public elementary school

Thurgood Marshall Elementary

Oxnard, CA · Grades TK-8 · 702 students · Oxnard

Scores climb 23.0 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But suspensions run 2× the state rate.

45% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 47% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

Growth Engine

What this means for your family

Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

How archetypes are assigned →

Contact

DistrictOxnard
PrincipalChantal Anderson-Witherspoon
GradesTK-8
Enrollment702 students

Math

47%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

English

45%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

702

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

22%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 29%2022: 18%2023: 47%2024: 47%2025: 47%2019: 41%2022: 34%2023: 43%2024: 52%2025: 45%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 29%2022: 18%2023: 47%2024: 47%2025: 47%2019: 41%2022: 34%2023: 43%2024: 52%2025: 45%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201929%41%
202218%34%
202347%43%
202447%52%
202547%45%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Climbed from the 38th to the 71st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.

Most rating sites would stop at “46% proficient” and call it done. Thurgood Marshall deserves a closer read. Two-thirds of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +23.0pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. Following the school's returning cohort from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

486 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 73 tracked

Thurgood Marshall Elementary scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 71st percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 46% of students meet the standard today, above the 37% who did in 2019.

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 38th percentile · Scope Score 31 of 1002022 · 28th percentile · Scope Score 24 of 1002023 · 53rd percentile · Scope Score 34 of 1002024 · 75th percentile · Scope Score 50 of 1002025 · 71st percentile · Scope Score 46 of 100
ELAYellow(Increased)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 332%31%40%48%28%
Grade 448%49%37%51%46%
Grade 551%38%46%55%61%
Grade 635%32%23%38%35%
Grade 7—40%36%21%52%
Grade 8—37%36%27%18%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%24%48%55%41%
Grade 435%33%31%48%49%
Grade 520%12%45%38%53%
Grade 615%25%9%21%30%
Grade 7—10%12%11%30%
Grade 8—16%3%12%11%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

Two in five of students here meet the standard. One in five clear it by a lot.

ELA40% met or exceeded
Exceeded 14%Met 26%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 34%
Math35% met or exceeded
Exceeded 16%Met 19%Nearly Met 25%Not Met 40%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)AbsenceSuspension
This school4622%46%Strong · p9421.6%3.8%
CA average · Elementary School3921%43%Average · p5017.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope4639
% Exceeded22%21%
% Met+46%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strong · p94Average · p50
Absence21.6%17.9%
Suspension3.8%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

California's own growth model splits here — the 23rd percentile in reading against the 48th in math, among elementary schools.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 23rd percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 48th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 94th. A gap that size between math and reading in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
14%
exceeded standard · 40% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
29%
exceeded standard · 61% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 94th percentile among California elementary schools.94th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −7 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 23rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.23rd pctile · −7 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: 0 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 48th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.48th pctile · 0 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.

At Thurgood Marshall Elementary in Oxnard, 35.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Thurgood Marshall Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 381 students tested.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 43%38%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 26%, state 32%34% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 32%, district 25%, state 32%32% · −6 vs school
MaleMale: this school 35%, district 28%, state 42%35% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 28%, state 44%41% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 6%, state 15%7% · −30 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 18%, district 11%, state 11%18% · −20 vs school

7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 32.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.1pp.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Hispanic or Latino students327 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 327 students.−8 pts · −9 vs typical
Low-income students303 studentsLow-income students, reading: −11 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 303 students.−11 pts · −11 vs typical
English Only237 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 237 students.−4 pts · −7 vs typical
English Learner130 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 130 students.−13 pts · −11 vs typical
Recently reclassified84 studentsRecently reclassified, reading: −16 scale-score points versus expectation, against +8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 84 students.−16 pts · −24 vs typical
Math
Hispanic or Latino students325 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 325 students.0 pts · +1 vs typical
Low-income students301 studentsLow-income students, math: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 301 students.−2 pts · −1 vs typical
English Only235 studentsEnglish Only, math: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 235 students.−3 pts · −4 vs typical
English Learner130 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +4 scale-score points versus expectation, against +2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 130 students.+4 pts · +2 vs typical
Recently reclassified84 studentsRecently reclassified, math: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against +6 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 84 students.−1 pts · −7 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 20 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher20 · district 20
Teaching staff43 teachers
Avg. experience15.7 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers2%
Intern / emergency permit2.4%
PrincipalChantal Anderson-Witherspoon
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$61,849 – $134,456
Principal salaryFrom $149,210
Superintendent salary$270,504

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended more, than the state average.

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 7–8 students (36.6% vs 16.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Ask on a visit

Ask about the discipline philosophy and what a typical suspension is for. Numbers can't tell you whether a campus feels strict or chaotic — a visit can.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 21.6%, district 21.4%, state 17.9%21.6% · +3.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.8%, district —, state 1.6%3.8% · +2.1pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.3%
Grades 7–816.7%
TK/K36.6%

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

It spends $25,452 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

$966 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,452, CA average $14,491$25,452 · spent at this school
Federal share$966 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,508 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 60%Instruction support 11%Student services 15%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,611 per pupil
2019$13,926 per pupil
2018$13,885 per pupil
2017$12,861 per pupil
2016$12,567 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino84.2% · district 94.2% · CA 56.1%
White6.1% · district 2.3% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.1% · district 0.7% · CA 10.2%
Black3.6% · district 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Other4.0% · district 2.0% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch74.8% · CA 64%
Median income$101K · CA $85K
Median home value$678K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+24% · CA 35%
ZIP population49,394
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Thurgood Marshall ElementaryPublicSolid22%46%School being viewed
Emilie Ritchen ElementaryPublicSolid20%41%0.6 mi
Marina West ElementaryPublicDeveloping13%33%2.6 mi
Montalvo ElementaryPublicDeveloping17%41%2.4 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in Oxnard →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

15 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Check your address with the district

School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Oxnard.

District information →School website →

Schools across the K–12 journey

Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Thurgood Marshall Elementary a good elementary school?
Thurgood Marshall Elementary has a Scope Score of 46 out of 100, placing it in the 71st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,645 statewide. 22.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Thurgood Marshall Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 46.1% of students at Thurgood Marshall Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 22.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 22.4% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 439 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Thurgood Marshall Elementary rank in California?
Thurgood Marshall Elementary ranks #1,645 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 71st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Thurgood Marshall Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Thurgood Marshall Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California elementary schools — roughly the 94th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Thurgood Marshall Elementary?
21.6% of students at Thurgood Marshall Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Thurgood Marshall Elementary compare to other schools in Oxnard?
Thurgood Marshall Elementary scores 46/100 (71st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 702 students. Use the schools in Oxnard page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Thurgood Marshall Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Thurgood Marshall Elementary in Oxnard, 35.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Thurgood Marshall Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 381 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

Growth carries this score — its returning cohort's growth from grade 3 to grade 5. The test levels sit close to the state's.

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 92 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard22.4%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded46.1%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism21.6%17.9%5%
Suspension rate3.8%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)15.2%18.0%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Thurgood Marshall Elementary: reading the evidence

Thurgood Marshall has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Thurgood Marshall Elementary is ranked #1,645 statewide · #1 of 17 in Oxnard.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard22.4%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded46.1%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism21.6%17.9%5%
Suspension rate3.8%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)15.2%18.0%5%
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 51 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 53 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
↑ vs CA average · 94th pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.9% · index 44 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.6pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 1.6% · index 32 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.7pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 18.0% · index 47 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3699%19%35%38%28%−16
Grade 47629%17%26%28%46%+1
Grade 57529%32%19%20%61%+14
Grade 69911%24%31%33%35%−11
Grade 7939%43%14%34%52%+4
Grade 8741%16%32%50%18%−29
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36913%28%30%29%41%−5
Grade 47626%22%30%21%49%+7
Grade 57428%24%22%26%53%+18
Grade 69913%17%22%47%30%−4
Grade 79317%13%28%42%30%−4
Grade 8741%9%19%70%11%−21

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide14811%16%49%24%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38135.2%+4−3
Hispanic/Latino40837.0%+5−2
Students with Disabilities697.2%+1−10
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Thurgood Marshall Elementary ←—4622.4%46.1%+23.0pp+92 pts3.8%
Emilie Ritchen Elementary0.6 mi3719.7%41.0%+3.1pp—0.3%
Marina West Elementary2.6 mi3413.2%33.4%−4.7pp—0.7%
Montalvo Elementary2.4 mi3417.4%40.7%−6.9pp—0.3%
California average—3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193138#337715.2%37.3%10.0%2.9%+0.0pp
20222428#408210.9%31.3%32.0%7.3%-2.5pp
20233453#268017.0%41.3%29.5%2.6%+1.9pp
20245075#141321.4%49.3%23.2%3.1%-5.2pp
20254671#164522.4%46.1%21.6%3.8%+23.0pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
Group20192025Δ
Female11.6%20.0%+8.4pp
Male8.4%23.5%+15.1pp
Asian16.7%18.8%+2.1pp
Black/African American11.5%26.9%+15.4pp
Filipino0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino10.2%23.5%+13.3pp
Two or More Races30.8%7.7%-23.1pp
White4.3%10.6%+6.3pp
Students with Disabilities12.9%27.0%+14.1pp
English Learners9.1%21.2%+12.1pp
Homeless13.3%23.6%+10.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.2%24.6%+12.4pp
All Students9.9%21.9%+12.0pp
Military-Connected—15.4%—
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−7391Moderate0389Average
Hispanic or Latino−8327Moderate0325Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−11303Moderate−2301Average
English Only−4237not categorised−3235not categorised
English Learner−13130Moderate+4130Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only−1684not categorised−184not categorised
Students with Disabilities−2074Moderate+374Average
English Learners Only−1446not categorised+746not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)−1832Moderate+432Average
Homeless Youth−1126Moderate−1526Moderate
White+326Average−526Average
Black or African American−612Moderate−312Average
Filipino−812Moderate+812Accelerated

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/thurgood-marshall-elementary-0362"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Thurgood Marshall Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Thurgood Marshall Elementary

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.