ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Emilie Ritchen Elementary · Oxnard

Emilie Ritchen Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Emilie Ritchen posts 41% meeting the standard and 19.7% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2200 Cabrillo Way, 93030 (opens in new tab)·Oxnard·Oxnard·Grades TK-5·445 students·85% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(805) 385-1572
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4345
% Exceeded20%21%
% Met+41%43%
Growth+3.1-2.9
Absence31.2%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%
Scope Score
43
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #2,749 statewide · #3 of 17 in Oxnard

Emilie Ritchen Elementary scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 52nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. Emilie Ritchen deserves a closer read. The school sits in Oxnard, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 20th to the 52nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 41% of students meet the standard today, above the 27% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 327%26%44%30%33%
Grade 431%38%28%38%52%
Grade 531%47%41%42%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 335%23%40%37%43%
Grade 420%20%28%33%37%
Grade 518%19%22%24%37%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

10%
22%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
29%
24%
47%
Grade 4 · 53% proficient
18%
27%
55%
Grade 5 · 45% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 8.1pp across grades; the floor rises 12.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
19.7%
State 21.3%
1.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+3.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
41.0%
State 42.7%
1.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
31.2%
State 17.9%
13.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.3%
State 1.6%
1.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.7%
State 18.0%
3.7pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Emilie Ritchen Elementary in Oxnard, 43.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Emilie Ritchen Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 148 students tested.

All students at this school: 41% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 41%, district —, state 43%41%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 39%, district 26%, state 32%39% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 39%, district 25%, state 32%39% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 35%, district 28%, state 42%35% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 50%, district 28%, state 44%50% · +9 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 41%, district 11%, state 11%41% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 15%, district 6%, state 15%15% · −26 vs school

6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 31.2%, district 21.4%, state 17.9%31.2% · +13.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.3pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (42.2% vs 23.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–623.7%
TK/K42.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Emilie Ritchen Elementary
43/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 20:119:1
Teaching staff30 teachers
Avg. experience18.1 years
Fully credentialed82%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,849 – $134,456
Principal salary$149,210 – $0
Superintendent salary$270,504

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,985, CA average $14,815$26,985 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,394 per student

$1,394 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,508 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support11%
Student services15%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,611 per pupil
2019$13,926 per pupil
2018$13,885 per pupil
2017$12,861 per pupil
2016$12,567 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic88.5%
District 94.2% · CA 56.1%
White3.8%
District 2.3% · CA 19.9%
Other3.8%
District 2.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.0%
District 0.7% · CA 10.2%
Black1.8%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 84.7% (21pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$93K · CA $85K
Median home value$688K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+17% · CA 35%
ZIP population58,192
Median age34 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 38% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Emilie Ritchen Elementary a good elementary school?

Emilie Ritchen Elementary has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 52nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,749 statewide. 19.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Emilie Ritchen Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 41.0% of students at Emilie Ritchen Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 19.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 19.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 344 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Emilie Ritchen Elementary rank in California?

Emilie Ritchen Elementary ranks #2,749 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 52nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Emilie Ritchen Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Emilie Ritchen Elementary increases by 3.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Emilie Ritchen Elementary?

31.2% of students at Emilie Ritchen Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Emilie Ritchen Elementary compare to other schools in Oxnard?

Emilie Ritchen Elementary scores 43/100 (52nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 445 students. Use the schools in Oxnard page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Emilie Ritchen Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Emilie Ritchen Elementary in Oxnard, 43.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Emilie Ritchen Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 148 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
19.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 48th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+3.1pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
41.0%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
31.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 28th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 61th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.7%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 56th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34910%22%35%33%33%−11
Grade 46329%24%11%37%52%+8
Grade 56018%27%22%33%45%−3
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34912%31%20%37%43%−3
Grade 46322%14%32%32%37%−5
Grade 56027%10%30%33%37%+1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116013%25%45%17%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14843.2%+12+5
Hispanic/Latino15441.6%+9+3
Students with Disabilities3016.7%+10−0
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Emilie Ritchen Elementary ←4319.7%41.0%+3.10.3%
Thurgood Marshall Elementary0.6 mi5422.4%46.1%+23.03.8%
Kamala Elementary3.1 mi438.3%25.9%+9.61.9%
Marina West Elementary2.2 mi4113.2%33.4%−4.70.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193120#44038.4%27.3%10.2%0.9%-6.6pp
20223855#25979.6%28.7%35.8%0.2%+8.4pp
20232923#441511.5%33.8%36.1%0.6%-10.3pp
20244457#247814.5%33.8%29.5%0.3%-0.5pp
20254352#274919.7%41.0%31.2%0.3%+3.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.5%29.6%+19.1pp
Male10.0%34.6%+24.6pp
Black/African American9.1%
Hispanic/Latino10.2%33.1%+22.9pp
Students with Disabilities12.7%42.4%+29.7pp
English Learners9.3%30.3%+21.0pp
Homeless42.9%33.3%-9.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.5%33.9%+22.4pp
All Students10.2%32.4%+22.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction