School district · Ventura County

Oxnard schools

Oxnard runs schools through 8th grade. Its 17 public elementary schools run from the 6th to the 71st percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 17 schools

from 6th to 71st · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Thurgood Marshall Elementary: 71st percentile, Solid
  • Emilie Ritchen Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Norman R. Brekke Elementary: 47th percentile, Developing
  • Harrington Elementary: 38th percentile, Developing
  • Marina West Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
  • Christa McAuliffe Elementary: 31st percentile, Developing
  • Sierra Linda Elementary: 31st percentile, Developing
  • Lemonwood Elementary: 27th percentile, Developing
  • Kamala Elementary: 25th percentile, Developing
  • McKinna Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • Rose Avenue Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • Ramona Elementary: 13th percentile, Needs Support
  • Cesar E. Chavez Elementary: 11th percentile, Needs Support
  • Elm Street Elementary: 9th percentile, Needs Support
  • Curren Elementary: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • Driffill Elementary: 6th percentile, Needs Support
8Needs Support
7Developing
2Solid
0Strong

Middle · 9 schools

from 14th to 53rd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Academy of Arts & Sciences: 53rd percentile, Solid
  • Curren Elementary: 42nd percentile, Developing
  • Kamala Elementary: 38th percentile, Developing
  • Driffill Elementary: 32nd percentile, Developing
  • Lemonwood Elementary: 27th percentile, Developing
  • Fremont Academy of Environmental Science & Innovative Design: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • R.J. Frank Academy of Marine Science & Engineering: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Juan Lagunas Soria Elementary: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Cesar E. Chavez Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
4Needs Support
4Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 6 of the 20 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 20 ranked schools

Schools around Oxnard

20 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Oxnard score highest?

Thurgood Marshall Elementary is highest, at the 71st percentile.

That’s higher than 71 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Oxnard

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 14 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Oxnard had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Oxnard score highest?

Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Academy of Arts & Sciences is highest, at the 53rd percentile.

That’s higher than 53 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Oxnard

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 6 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Oxnard had 17 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

The district

Where does Oxnard’s money go, and what does it plan?

Oxnard spent $25,508 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Oxnard dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction59%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services15%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$159.5 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 155 funded actions in 5 goals. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 327 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 46% of the money. The plan itself puts 65% of it toward staff.

  • Interventions: Tier III and Special Education $41.6 million
  • Child Nutrition $19.3 million
  • Expansion of Learning Opportunities $13.2 million
  • 152 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

12 of the plan’s 155 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $2.9 million
  • Math $0.4 million
  • Catch-up help $44.9 million
  • English learners $0.3 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Interventions: Tier III and Special Education$41.6 million
  • Literacy Intervention Teachers$2.9 million
  • Professional Learning: Mathematics$228,185
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth) and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $69.5 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $59.8 million and estimates it spent $59.8 million, the same as planned.

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Student Academic Engagement and Achievement34%34%no change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 322%23%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2 · Learning Environment and School Climate21 in 10019 in 1002 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2 · Learning Environment and School Climate2.3%2.5%up 0.2 pts

Goals 4 and 5 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Interventions: Tier III and Special Education · $41,564,562
  • Child Nutrition · $19,309,249
  • Expansion of Learning Opportunities · $13,167,484
The full plan5 goals, 29 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($159.5 million).

Where does the money go?

60% to Goal 2, Learning Environment and School Climate. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2
G3
G5

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Student Academic Engagement and Achievement$3.8 million2% of action budgets

“Dramatically accelerate student academic engagement and achievement across all Oxnard populations through coherent additive approaches, essential pedagogical principles, and high-leverage practices. (SP 1.1) HIGH INTELLECTUAL PERFORMANCE (SP 1.2) STRENGTHENING INSTRUCTION & STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (SP 1.3) STUDENT PROFILE-DRIVEN LESSON DESIGN (SP 1.4) MULTILINGUALISM (SP 1.5) TECHNOLOGY” p. 23 ↗

20 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Teachers for the Arts$2.5 millionaction 1.4 · p. 249 ↗
  2. Expansion of the Arts$0.4 millionaction 1.3 · p. 249 ↗
  3. Academic Incentives and Recognitions$0.2 millionaction 1.1 · p. 249 ↗
  4. Learning Management System$0.2 millionaction 1.8 · p. 249 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Professional Learning Communities$0.1 millionaction 1.19 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

15 more funded actions in this goal

  • Data Management Systems · action 1.9 · p. 249 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Implementation of Grade-Level Standards · action 1.11 · p. 250 ↗$0.1 million
  • Implementation and Expansion of Biliteracy · action 1.5 · p. 249 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $20,000 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Project Based Learning · action 1.14 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Interdisciplinary Units · action 1.15 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Portfolio Management System: Transitional Kindergarten · action 1.10 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Implementation of the CA Frameworks · action 1.18 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Implementation of Essential Pedogogical Principles · action 1.17 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Alignment of State Standards and Local Assessments · action 1.12 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Universal Design for Learning · action 1.16 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Developing Multilingualism · action 1.20 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Expand Primary Language Classroom and Site Libraries · action 1.6 · p. 249 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Vertical and Horizonal Planning and Communiction · action 1.13 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Implementation of Oxnard "MAS"/​Emergent Multilingual Master Plan · action 1.21 · p. 250 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Implementation of Oxnard EMPOWERS/ OSDs Master Plan · action 1.22 · p. 250 ↗under $0.1 million

How the plan measures it · 10 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 23 ↗.

Goal 2Learning Environment and School Climate$96.3 million60% of action budgets

“Create and maintain safe, inclusive, affirming, equitable, and enriched culturally and linguistically sustaining multilingual learning environments of high intellectual performance across all content areas and in all areas needed for 21st-century success. (SP 2.1) MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT (MTSS) (SP 2.2) ACCESS, EQUITY, & INCLUSION (SP 2.3) RESTORATIVE PRACTICES (SP 2.4) AFFIRMING LEARNING ENVIRONMENT & RELATIONSHIPS (SP 2.5) FACILITIES & GROUNDS” p. 49 ↗

36 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Interventions: Tier III and Special Education$41.6 millionaction 2.5 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $15.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Child Nutrition$19.3 millionaction 2.32 · p. 253 ↗
  3. Expansion of Learning Opportunities$13.2 millionaction 2.19 · p. 252 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Transportation for General Education, Homeless and Foster Youth$7.3 millionaction 2.30 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Literacy Intervention Teachers$2.9 millionaction 2.10 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

31 more funded actions in this goal

  • Expanded Summer Learning · action 2.18 · p. 252 ↗$2.9 million
  • Tier III and Specialized Support · action 2.6 · p. 251 ↗$2.7 million
  • Facilities/​Deferred Maintenance · action 2.34 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.5 million
  • Attendance Technicians · action 2.16 · p. 252 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.5 million
  • Library/​Media Technicians · action 2.20 · p. 252 ↗$1.0 million
  • Safe Learning Environments · action 2.26 · p. 252 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $50,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
  • Social Emotional Development Supports: Panorama · action 2.8 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $59,600 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Positive Behavior Supports (PBIS) · action 2.25 · p. 252 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $285,322 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • School Resource Officers · action 2.27 · p. 252 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Restorative Practices · action 2.24 · p. 252 ↗$0.2 million
  • Interventions: English Language Development · action 2.12 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $76,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • AVID Implementation · action 2.22 · p. 252 ↗$0.2 million
  • Mathematics Intervention: IXL · action 2.3 · p. 251 ↗$0.1 million
  • Tutoring · action 2.9 · p. 251 ↗$0.1 million
  • School Attendance Review Board (SARB) · action 2.17 · p. 252 ↗$0.1 million
  • School Safety Plans · action 2.28 · p. 253 ↗$0.1 million
  • Newcomer Academy · action 2.15 · p. 251 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Migrant Education Program (MEP) · action 2.14 · p. 251 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Special Programs · action 2.37 · p. 253 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Universal Screening: Gifted and Talented · action 2.13 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $20,000 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Materials and Supplies for Youth Experiencing Homelessness/ McKinney-Vento · action 2.31 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Alternative Disciplinary Approaches · action 2.7 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $10,000 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Mathematics Intervention: Math Labs · action 2.4 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Intervention: Middle School · action 2.11 · p. 251 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Maintain Diverse School Libraries · action 2.21 · p. 252 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Student Assemblies: Social Media and Positive Interactions · action 2.29 · p. 253 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Student Mentoring Opportunities · action 2.35 · p. 253 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Substance Abuse Prevention · action 2.33 · p. 253 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Superintendent Fellows · action 2.36 · p. 253 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) · action 2.38 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Annual Parent Rights Notification · action 2.23 · p. 252 ↗under $0.1 million

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 49 ↗.

Goal 3Guidance and Support to Sites and District Departments: Provide strategic direction, guidance, and support to…$22.0 million14% of action budgets

“Guidance and Support to Sites and District Departments: Provide strategic direction, guidance, and support to sites and district departments focused on improving the quality of instruction, interaction, and engagement in every classroom, in every school so that all students reach high levels of academic excellence, multilingual achievement, global competency, and healthy identity development, agency, and voice. (SP 3.1) CULTURE OF EMPOWERMENT (SP 3.2) PROFESSIONAL LEARNING & SUPPORT (SP 3.3) RECOGNITIONS (SP 3.4) STUDENT ASSESSMENT (SP 3.5) SUPPORT TO SITES” p. 88 ↗

41 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Teachers Above Base Staffing$6.3 millionaction 3.36 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. School Site Allocations to be Prioritized by School Site Council$4.5 millionaction 3.38 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.7 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Above Base/ Assistant Principals$4.2 millionaction 3.39 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.9 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Teachers on Special Assignment/​Content Specialists$1.7 millionaction 3.2 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $370,717 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Maintain 24:1 TK- 3rd Grade Average$1.7 millionaction 3.37 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

36 more funded actions in this goal

  • Textbook Adoptions · action 3.35 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $60,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.7 million
  • Professional Learning: Planning for Access and Equity/​Orenda · action 3.17 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $137,889 is state funding counted toward those services$0.5 million
  • Implementation of Required State Assessments · action 3.33 · p. 256 ↗$0.4 million
  • Developing Human Capital: PD for Strategic Plan Recommendations · action 3.1 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Professional Learning: Mathematics · action 3.9 · p. 254 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Consulting Teacher · action 3.30 · p. 256 ↗$0.2 million
  • Professional Learning: Central Management · action 3.4 · p. 253 ↗$0.2 million
  • Professional Learning for Educational Leaders · action 3.5 · p. 253 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $8,769 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Professional Learning for Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs) and Content Specialists · action 3.6 · p. 254 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $92,228 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Supplemental Instructional Materials · action 3.41 · p. 257 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Implementation of State Standards · action 3.3 · p. 253 ↗$0.1 million
  • Future Administrators Academy · action 3.29 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: De-escalation Strategies & Behavior Supports · action 3.43 · p. 257 ↗$0.1 million
  • Professional Learning for Teachers: Newcomers Academy · action 3.11 · p. 254 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Health Education · action 3.12 · p. 254 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Training: Medical Response · action 3.25 · p. 256 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning and Wellness for Staff · action 3.21 · p. 255 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Gifted and Talented Education · action 3.14 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Restorative Practices · action 3.19 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning for Teachers: Middle School Content Specific · action 3.10 · p. 254 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Spanish Language, Common Core en Espanol and World Language Standards · action 3.7 · p. 254 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning for Teachers: Biliteracy · action 3.8 · p. 254 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Counselors · action 3.20 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Training and Professional Learning for Classified Staff · action 3.24 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $10,350 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning for Outreach Consultants (ORCs) · action 3.22 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Review/​Redesign Report Cards · action 3.32 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Transitional Kindergarten · action 3.13 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Peer Assitance Review (PAR) · action 3.31 · p. 256 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: English Language Development · action 3.42 · p. 257 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Training and Professional Learning: Renaissance · action 3.15 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Training and Professional Learning: Data Management Systems · action 3.27 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Training and Professional Learning: Communication Platforms · action 3.28 · p. 256 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • TK Teacher Release Day for Collaboration and Data Review · action 3.45 · p. 257 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Training: Action Preparedness · action 3.26 · p. 256 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Training and Professional Learning for Substitute Teachers · action 3.23 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Learning: Cultural Proficiency and Focus on Equitable Practices · action 3.16 · p. 255 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 88 ↗.

Goal 4Family/Community Alliances for Student Success$2.8 million2% of action budgets

“Create and grow family and community alliances focused strategically on their collaborative leadership role in supporting and promoting student success for all students, as defined by the Oxnard Student Profile. (SP 4.1) STUDENT PROFILE ALLIANCES (SP 4.2) FAMILY ENGAGEMENT & SUPPORT (SP 4.3) PARENT/​FAMILY RESOURCES (SP 4.4) COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS & RELATIONSHIP BUILDING (SP 4.5) HIGHER EDUCATION (SP 4.6) FAMILY/​COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS” p. 132 ↗

18 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Enrollment Center$963,387action 4.4 · p. 257 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $706,580 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Translators/ Interpreters: Spanish$771,141action 4.13 · p. 258 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $19,366 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Implement Coordination of Family Engagement and Parent Support Services based on a Family Engagement Framework, Family and Community Engagement committees, DELAC, Parent Education and Support$309,566action 4.1 · p. 257 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $70,791 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Translators/ Interpreters: Mixteco$189,918action 4.12 · p. 258 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $36,246 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Revamp and Maximize Accessibility to the District’s Website (Web Content Analyst)$149,758action 4.16 · p. 258 ↗

13 more funded actions in this goal

  • Parent Support Liaison · action 4.11 · p. 258 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $27,161 is state funding counted toward those services$110,681
  • Family Resource Center · action 4.3 · p. 257 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$58,894
  • Special Education: Parent/​Family Supports · action 4.10 · p. 258 ↗$50,000
  • Higher Education/​College and Career Opportunities · action 4.20 · p. 258 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $24,000 is state funding counted toward those services$36,388
  • Equitable Access for Participation (Zoom) · action 4.2 · p. 257 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$33,660
  • Home Learning Resources for Student Success · action 4.18 · p. 258 ↗$32,516
  • Board Room · action 4.17 · p. 258 ↗$24,000
  • Systems of Communication to Include the Voices of our Different Parent Groups in the Design of Learning Experiences for Unduplicated Student Groups and Families · action 4.7 · p. 257 ↗$15,000
  • Contract for Interpreting Services · action 4.14 · p. 258 ↗$10,000
  • Indian Education Service Plan · action 4.19 · p. 258 ↗$7,046
  • Supporting Cultural Proficiency and Focus on Equitable Practices · action 4.8 · p. 257 ↗$5,900
  • Transition to High School-Parent Workshops · action 4.9 · p. 258 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2,500
  • Panorama Surveys · action 4.15 · p. 258 ↗$500

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 132 ↗.

Goal 5Transformational Leadership and Infrastructure$34.6 million22% of action budgets

“Create a coherent and sustainable districtwide infrastructure and culture to support and communicate the district’s identity and strategic work on behalf of all students; facilitate strategic plan implementation; monitor progress and assess effectiveness and sustainability; and position the district as a leader in equitable and excellent education. (SP 5.1) STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION (SP 5.2) DISTRICTWIDE COHERENCE (SP 5.3) ACCOUNTABILITY & PROGRESS MONITORING (SP 5.4) HUMAN CAPITAL (SP 5.5) COMMUNICATIONS (SP 5.6) FINANCE & TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE” p. 154 ↗

40 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Student Technology Access and Annual Refresh$7.1 millionaction 5.39 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.3 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Counselors$5.2 millionaction 5.18 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4.6 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Campus Assistants/​Supervisors$3.9 millionaction 5.24 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Educational Services: Management and Support Staff$2.6 millionaction 5.15 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $955,500 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Outreach Specialists$2.1 millionaction 5.20 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

35 more funded actions in this goal

  • Kindergarten Paraeducators · action 5.28 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.7 million is state funding counted toward those services$1.9 million
  • Professional Learning: Three District Days · action 5.4 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.8 million
  • District Wide Banking of Minutes · action 5.5 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.5 million
  • Transitional Kindergarten Paraeducators · action 5.27 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.4 million
  • Mental Health Clinician · action 5.21 · p. 260 ↗$1.2 million
  • District Nurses · action 5.31 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $364,777 is state funding counted toward those services$1.1 million
  • Health Assistants and/​or Health Care Technicians (LVNs) · action 5.23 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Healthy Start Social Workers · action 5.22 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $539,958 is state funding counted toward those services$0.7 million
  • Resources: Superintendent · action 5.3 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6,500 is state funding counted toward those services$0.5 million
  • General Education Paraeducators · action 5.29 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $321,455 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
  • Practi-Cal Medical Billing · action 5.38 · p. 261 ↗$0.3 million
  • Communication Platforms · action 5.32 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $223,810 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Director of Pupil Services · action 5.17 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Recruitment, Selection and Retention of Human Capital · action 5.25 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $63,998 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Manager of Equity, Family and Community · action 5.16 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $44,012 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Communications from Central Office · action 5.34 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Board of Education · action 5.2 · p. 258 ↗$0.2 million
  • District Family and Community Liaison · action 5.19 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $117,362 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Recruitment: Classified Positions · action 5.26 · p. 260 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $9,023 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Required Accountability Templates · action 5.37 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Opportunity Program Paraeducators · action 5.30 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Refine Middle School Systems · action 5.36 · p. 261 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Collaboration Opportunities: Transitional Kindergarten & Kindergarten Teachers · action 5.10 · p. 259 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Staff to Provide General Education Behavior Support · action 5.40 · p. 262 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Collaboration Opportunities: Biliteracy · action 5.11 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Professional Collaboratives · action 5.8 · p. 259 ↗under $0.1 million
  • New Teacher Institute · action 5.6 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $500 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Collaboration Opportunities: Mathematics · action 5.9 · p. 259 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Collaboration Opportunites: Supporing the Implementation of State Standards and Frameworks · action 5.13 · p. 259 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Collaboration Opportunities: Middle School · action 5.12 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Oxnard Empowers - Implementation of Strategic Plan · action 5.1 · p. 258 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Institute for New Administrators · action 5.7 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Employee Onboarding · action 5.14 · p. 259 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Internal Communication Systems · action 5.33 · p. 261 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Curriculum Council · action 5.35 · p. 261 ↗under $0.1 million

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 154 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 13,003 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 94%2. White: 2%3. Filipino: 1%4. Two or more races: <1%5. Black or African American: <1%6. Asian: <1%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino94%
  2. White2%
  3. Filipino1%
  4. Two or more races<1%
  5. Black or African American<1%
  6. Asian<1%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

88%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 11,488 of 13,003 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Oxnard extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 49% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (2,224 of 4,543 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Marina West Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (4)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Oxnard rank highest?

Elementary: Thurgood Marshall Elementary, 71st percentile (Solid). Middle: Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Academy of Arts & Sciences, 53rd percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Oxnard district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Oxnard good?

Oxnard’s 17 public elementary schools run from the 6th to the 71st percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Solid, 7 Developing and 8 Needs Support. Oxnard’s 9 public middle schools run from the 14th to the 53rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 4 Developing and 4 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Oxnard compare with California?

The average elementary school in Oxnard had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Oxnard had 17 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Oxnard spend per student?

Oxnard spent $25,508 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Oxnard dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Oxnard’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $159.5 million into 155 funded actions in 5 goals. Its largest goal holds $96.3 million, 60% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Oxnard, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.