Summit Intermediate: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Summit Intermediate posts 62% meeting the standard, and 32.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 64 | 32% | 62% | +0.4 | 8.6% | 2.7% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Summit Intermediate scores 64 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “62% proficient” and call it done. Summit Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Etiwanda, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Summit Intermediate's low-income kids hit 52.1% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 79th to the 89th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 62% of students meet the standard today, above the 57% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 60% | 56% | 53% | 66% | 64% |
| Grade 7 | 68% | 72% | 64% | 68% | 76% |
| Grade 8 | 64% | 62% | 64% | 64% | 66% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 47% | 43% | 42% | 55% | 52% |
| Grade 7 | 50% | 45% | 43% | 52% | 61% |
| Grade 8 | 52% | 45% | 48% | 47% | 51% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.7pp across grades; the floor rises 1.9pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Summit Intermediate's most underrated number
52.1% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Summit Intermediate in Etiwanda, 52.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 57.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Summit Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 5.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (66.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 285 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +8.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 36% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Summit Intermediate a good middle school?
What are Summit Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?
How does Summit Intermediate rank in California?
Is Summit Intermediate getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Summit Intermediate?
How does Summit Intermediate compare to other schools in Etiwanda?
How does Summit Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 64
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 73
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 59
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 327 | 29% | 35% | 22% | 14% | 64% | +17 |
| Grade 7 | 337 | 36% | 39% | 15% | 9% | 76% | +28 |
| Grade 8 | 351 | 26% | 40% | 21% | 13% | 66% | +20 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 328 | 33% | 20% | 27% | 21% | 52% | +17 |
| Grade 7 | 338 | 37% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 61% | +27 |
| Grade 8 | 351 | 34% | 17% | 21% | 28% | 51% | +19 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 353 | 10% | 26% | 58% | 6% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 285 | 52.1% | −6 | +14 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 499 | 66.3% | +4 | +27 |
| White | 212 | 72.2% | −3 | +10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Intermediate ← | — | 64 | 32.4% | 61.6% | +0.4 | 2.7% |
| Day Creek Intermediate | 1.4 mi | 78 | 53.4% | 77.5% | −0.7 | 2.3% |
| Heritage Intermediate | 2 mi | 58 | 27.0% | 55.7% | +8.1 | 2.4% |
| Etiwanda Intermediate | 1.3 mi | 56 | 29.9% | 57.1% | +11.4 | 2.1% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 54 | 79 | #413 | 25.2% | 56.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | +5.0pp |
| 2022 | 53 | 81 | #419 | 23.9% | 53.7% | 25.2% | 2.3% | +3.9pp |
| 2023 | 61 | 86 | #312 | 23.5% | 52.4% | 18.4% | 2.9% | +8.6pp |
| 2024 | 58 | 86 | #316 | 27.7% | 58.5% | 9.9% | 2.7% | -4.3pp |
| 2025 | 64 | 89 | #239 | 32.4% | 61.6% | 8.6% | 2.7% | +0.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.6% | 8.2% | +4.6pp |
| Male | 4.2% | 8.5% | +4.3pp |
| Asian | 1.1% | 2.2% | +1.1pp |
| Black/African American | 3.2% | 12.6% | +9.4pp |
| White | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 5.5% | 10.1% | +4.6pp |
| Two or More Races | 6.1% | 9.4% | +3.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 6.9% | 14.0% | +7.1pp |
| English Learners | 2.6% | 10.4% | +7.8pp |
| Homeless | 8.4% | 18.8% | +10.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 7.4% | 17.0% | +9.6pp |
| All Students | 3.9% | 8.4% | +4.5pp |
| Filipino | — | 8.7% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction