Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies posts 46% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 51 | 21% | 46% | +13.2 | 20.5% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies scores 51 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 69th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “46% proficient” and call it done. Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies deserves a closer read. The school sits in Woodland Hills, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
As a charter, Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 69th percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 46% meet the standard today, versus 61% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 59% | 57% | 46% | 41% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 67% | 64% | 59% | 48% | 42% |
| Grade 5 | 64% | 63% | 64% | 61% | 61% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 61% | 59% | 45% | 43% | 47% |
| Grade 4 | 53% | 61% | 53% | 44% | 33% |
| Grade 5 | 59% | 54% | 47% | 49% | 53% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 9.8pp across grades; the floor rises 20.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies in Woodland Hills, 40.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies trails its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.9% Math proficient); White students (55.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 145 students tested.
5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 30.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to Woodland Hills Academy, which scores 19 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,310 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 44% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies a good elementary school?
What are Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies's CAASPP test scores?
How does Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies rank in California?
Is Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies?
How does Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies compare to other schools in Woodland Hills?
How does Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 59
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 46
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 88 | 18% | 23% | 22% | 38% | 41% | −2 |
| Grade 4 | 89 | 21% | 20% | 25% | 34% | 42% | −3 |
| Grade 5 | 75 | 28% | 33% | 12% | 27% | 61% | +13 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 89 | 21% | 26% | 22% | 30% | 47% | +1 |
| Grade 4 | 92 | 13% | 20% | 29% | 38% | 33% | −9 |
| Grade 5 | 77 | 23% | 30% | 17% | 30% | 53% | +18 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 77 | 25% | 19% | 39% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 145 | 40.0% | −1 | +2 |
| White | 105 | 55.2% | −14 | −7 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 62 | 32.3% | −9 | −7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serrania Avenue Charter for Enriched Studies ← | — | 51 | 20.9% | 46.1% | +13.2 | 0.3% |
| Chaparral Elementary | 2.2 mi | 62 | 37.4% | 69.2% | −9.8 | 0.3% |
| Woodland Hills Elementary Charter for Enriched Stu | 1.2 mi | 61 | 44.4% | 72.8% | −10.8 | 0.3% |
| Shirley Avenue Elementary | 3.1 mi | 54 | 20.1% | 44.8% | −0.6 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 57 | 76 | #1305 | 31.8% | 60.6% | 20.1% | 0.0% | +1.5pp |
| 2022 | 52 | 79 | #1202 | 30.1% | 59.6% | 25.4% | 0.3% | +0.9pp |
| 2023 | 56 | 80 | #1153 | 26.7% | 52.5% | 28.6% | 0.7% | +9.9pp |
| 2024 | 45 | 58 | #2400 | 22.5% | 47.8% | 20.5% | 0.6% | +12.7pp |
| 2025 | 51 | 69 | #1777 | 20.9% | 46.1% | 20.5% | 0.3% | +13.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 18.2% | 18.2% | +0.0pp |
| Male | 22.3% | 22.8% | +0.5pp |
| Asian | 12.9% | 18.2% | +5.3pp |
| Black/African American | 30.0% | 22.0% | -8.0pp |
| White | 14.3% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 26.1% | 29.1% | +3.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 20.4% | 25.6% | +5.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 32.0% | 29.3% | -2.7pp |
| English Learners | 19.4% | 26.7% | +7.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 25.3% | 27.4% | +2.1pp |
| All Students | 20.3% | 20.6% | +0.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 14.3% | — |
| Homeless | — | 77.8% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction