ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Woodland Hills

CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community posts 52% meeting the standard; 22.1% push past it. Steady is worth something — and the gap between those two numbers is the thing to ask about.

19722 Collier Street, 91364 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Woodland Hills·Grades K-8·724 students·18% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(818) 346-5100·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Scope Score
45
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #2,242 statewide · #218 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “52% proficient” and call it done. CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community deserves a closer read. It sits at the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

As a charter, CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

23%
23%
54%
Grade 3 · 46% proficient
23%
34%
43%
Grade 4 · 57% proficient
24%
20%
56%
Grade 5 · 44% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
22.1%
State 21.3%
0.7pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
51.5%
State 42.7%
8.9pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.9pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Chronic absenteeism
13.4%
State 17.9%
4.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.9%
State 1.6%
0.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic20.9%
White65.1%
Asian2.4%
Black3.3%
Other8.4%
GenderFemale 51.4%Male 48.6%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 18.4% (45pp below CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
724
104 above CA avg (~620)
Transitional Kindergarten
TK status unconfirmed
No TK enrollment is on file with the state for this school — that isn't the same as “no TK.” Confirm directly with the district.
Student-Teacher Ratio
23:1
2 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$18,180
CA avg: $14,815 · District avg · NCES F-33
Teacher Salary Range
$60,420 – $122,706
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community in Woodland Hills, 39.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community trails its district average for low-income students by 1.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.4% Math proficient); White students (56.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 92 students tested.
Equity Gaps
ELA · Disabilities−27.8pp
26.1% vs 54.0% overall · n=47
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−16.1pp
6.7% vs 22.8% overall · n=47
Math · Disabilities−24.5pp
22.1% vs 46.6% overall · n=46
Math Exceeded · Low-Income−14.7pp
6.1% vs 20.9% overall · n=50

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income92 tested
ELA 39.8%·Math 26.4%· -1.1pp vs district
White279 tested
ELA 56.5%·Math 49.3%· -12.4pp vs district
Hispanic87 tested
ELA 46.0%·Math 38.4%· +5.0pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 14.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 55%Support 40%Other 4%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$133K
$48K above CA median
Median Home Value
$1.21M
$549K above CA median
Bachelor's+
56%
21pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
10.5 years avg experience
46 teachers · 7% second-year
Teacher Credentials
92% fully credentialed
4.0% on intern/emergency permit

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →
For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
22.1%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
51.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 57th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 15%
-9.9pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 40th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
13.4%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.9%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 56th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37123%23%34%21%45%+2
Grade 48323%34%25%18%57%+12
Grade 57124%20%27%30%44%−4
Grade 67520%39%16%25%59%+12
Grade 76632%36%18%14%68%+21
Grade 85816%36%28%21%52%+6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37120%39%27%14%59%+13
Grade 48328%36%23%13%64%+22
Grade 57115%25%27%32%41%+6
Grade 67412%20%34%34%32%−3
Grade 76531%20%37%12%51%+17
Grade 85719%12%26%42%32%−1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1113012%27%52%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9239.8%−1+2
White27956.5%−12−5
Hispanic/Latino8746.0%+5+7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community ←4522.1%51.5%−9.90.9%
Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies1.9 mi6131.8%64.0%−12.80.7%
Wilbur Charter for Enriched Academics1.1 mi5934.5%62.5%+10.30.1%
Nestle Avenue Charter1.8 mi5229.6%52.6%−1.60.5%
California average4321.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
37%45%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #3201 → #1744 → #1445 → #1908 → #2242
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

Frequently asked questions

Is CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community a good elementary school?
CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,242 statewide. 22.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 51.5% of students at CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 22.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 29.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 22.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 450 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community rank in California?
CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community ranks #2,242 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community decreases by 9.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community?
13.4% of students at CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community compare to other schools in Woodland Hills?
CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community scores 45/100 (61st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 724 students. Use the schools in Woodland Hills page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community in Woodland Hills, 39.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community trails its district average for low-income students by 1.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.4% Math proficient); White students (56.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 92 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.