Sequoia Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Sequoia posts 65% meeting the standard, and 39.7% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 55 | 40% | 65% | -7.2 | 12.5% | 0.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Sequoia Elementary scores 55 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 76th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “65% proficient” and call it done. Sequoia deserves a closer read. The school sits in Oakland, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 76th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 65% of students meet the standard today, above the 53% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 58% | 66% | 74% | 71% | 68% |
| Grade 4 | 59% | 81% | 74% | 62% | 66% |
| Grade 5 | 56% | 61% | 72% | 61% | 65% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52% | 69% | 66% | 75% | 65% |
| Grade 4 | 48% | 68% | 62% | 64% | 71% |
| Grade 5 | 43% | 44% | 52% | 58% | 53% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 12.3pp across grades; the floor slips 2.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Sequoia Elementary in Oakland, 44.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 24.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sequoia Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.0% Math proficient); White students (87.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.0 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 88 students tested.
5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.6pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to Bret Harte Middle, which scores 27 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$168 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 50% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Sequoia Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Sequoia Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Sequoia Elementary rank in California?
Is Sequoia Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Sequoia Elementary?
How does Sequoia Elementary compare to other schools in Oakland?
How does Sequoia Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 74
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 50% | 18% | 16% | 16% | 68% | +24 |
| Grade 4 | 65 | 38% | 28% | 14% | 20% | 66% | +21 |
| Grade 5 | 69 | 38% | 28% | 17% | 17% | 65% | +17 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 43% | 22% | 19% | 16% | 65% | +19 |
| Grade 4 | 65 | 43% | 28% | 22% | 8% | 71% | +29 |
| Grade 5 | 70 | 26% | 27% | 20% | 27% | 53% | +18 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 70 | 26% | 24% | 40% | 10% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 88 | 44.3% | +20 | +6 |
| White | 62 | 87.1% | +19 | +25 |
| Two or More Races | 50 | 74.0% | +20 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Elementary ← | — | 55 | 39.7% | 64.6% | −7.2 | 0.5% |
| Beach Elementary | 2.4 mi | 76 | 63.1% | 89.7% | +2.2 | 2.1% |
| Wildwood Elementary | 1.8 mi | 73 | 56.4% | 85.0% | −7.5 | 0.4% |
| Havens Elementary | 2 mi | 73 | 49.7% | 78.5% | −2.8 | 0.5% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 53 | 71 | #1574 | 28.5% | 52.5% | 20.0% | 0.0% | -5.0pp |
| 2022 | 49 | 75 | #1434 | 39.6% | 64.8% | 24.8% | 2.0% | -15.0pp |
| 2023 | 53 | 77 | #1289 | 39.9% | 66.6% | 50.7% | 3.2% | -8.0pp |
| 2024 | 53 | 73 | #1537 | 40.2% | 65.1% | 18.6% | 2.5% | -13.5pp |
| 2025 | 55 | 76 | #1407 | 39.7% | 64.6% | 12.5% | 0.5% | -7.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 20.7% | 10.2% | -10.5pp |
| Male | 19.8% | 14.6% | -5.2pp |
| Asian | 17.0% | 9.8% | -7.2pp |
| Black/African American | 27.3% | 17.6% | -9.7pp |
| Filipino | 25.0% | 22.2% | -2.8pp |
| White | 18.2% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 25.5% | 16.0% | -9.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 12.1% | 8.1% | -4.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 27.7% | 14.9% | -12.8pp |
| English Learners | 28.2% | 2.2% | -26.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 33.6% | 20.2% | -13.4pp |
| All Students | 20.2% | 12.1% | -8.1pp |
| Homeless | — | 42.9% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction