ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
San Jose Intermediate · Novato

San Jose Intermediate: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

San Jose Intermediate posts 42% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3943
% Exceeded21%17%
% Met+42%39%
Growth-9.9+1.5
Absence17.9%18.5%
Suspension2.7%3.7%
Scope Score
39
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,209 statewide · #3 of 4 in Novato Unified

San Jose Intermediate scores 39 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 46th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “42% proficient” and call it done. San Jose Intermediate deserves a closer read. It sits at the 46th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 80th to the 46th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 42% meet the standard today, versus 53% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 651%53%46%37%46%
Grade 758%59%52%52%41%
Grade 856%51%43%52%50%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 644%37%43%38%49%
Grade 756%38%45%35%42%
Grade 854%40%31%28%26%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
27%
54%
Grade 6 · 46% proficient
19%
22%
59%
Grade 7 · 41% proficient
19%
31%
50%
Grade 8 · 50% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 3.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.5%
State 16.8%
3.7pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-9.9pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
42.3%
State 39.3%
3.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.9%
State 18.5%
0.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.7%
State 3.7%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
18.2%
State 18.0%
0.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At San Jose Intermediate in Novato, 26.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. San Jose Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 313 students tested.

All students at this school: 42% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 42%, district —, state 39%42%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 24%, district 29%, state 32%24% · −18 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 29%, state 32%23% · −19 vs school
MaleMale: this school 41%, district 47%, state 42%41% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 43%, district 47%, state 44%43% · +1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 70%, district 65%, state 56%70% · +28 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 8%, state 11%5% · −37 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 16%, state 15%10% · −32 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 74%, district 63%, state 56%74% · +31 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 68%, district 74%, state 72%68% · +26 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 10%, district 13%, state 22%10% · −32 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 50%, district 39%, state 46%50% · +8 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.1pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +3.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.9%, district 14.0%, state 18.5%17.9% · −0.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.7%, district —, state 3.7%2.7% · −0.9pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (20.3% vs 12.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.6%
Grades 7–820.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Middle
San Jose Intermediate
39/100
This school
High School

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience14.1 years
Fully credentialed76%
First-year teachers17%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,953 – $133,072
Principal salary$158,792 – $183,904
Superintendent salary$289,800

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,318, CA average $14,815$18,318 · spent at this school
Federal share$430 per student

$430 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,474 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,709 per pupil
2019$12,337 per pupil
2018$13,101 per pupil
2017$11,526 per pupil
2016$11,161 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic57.8%
District 40.5% · CA 56.1%
White27.3%
District 43.1% · CA 19.9%
Asian6.4%
District 4.5% · CA 10.2%
Other6.4%
District 10.1% · CA 9.0%
Black2.1%
District 1.7% · CA 4.8%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$121K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.15M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+51% · CA 35%
ZIP population17,787
Median age48 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is San Jose Intermediate a good middle school?

San Jose Intermediate has a Scope Score of 39 out of 100, placing it in the 46th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,209 statewide. 20.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.7 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are San Jose Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 42.3% of students at San Jose Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,099 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does San Jose Intermediate rank in California?

San Jose Intermediate ranks #1,209 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 46th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is San Jose Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at San Jose Intermediate decreases by 9.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at San Jose Intermediate?

17.9% of students at San Jose Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does San Jose Intermediate compare to other schools in Novato?

San Jose Intermediate scores 39/100 (46th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Novato page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does San Jose Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At San Jose Intermediate in Novato, 26.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. San Jose Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 313 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.5%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 54th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-9.9pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 33th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
42.3%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 52th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.9%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.7%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 54th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
18.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 617019%27%19%35%46%−0
Grade 718719%22%19%40%41%−6
Grade 819019%31%23%27%50%+4
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 617029%19%19%32%49%+14
Grade 719022%19%17%42%42%+8
Grade 819214%11%23%51%26%−7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111939%23%55%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged31326.5%−8−12
Hispanic/Latino30726.1%−8−13
White15474.0%+3+12
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
San Jose Intermediate ←3920.5%42.3%−9.92.7%
Sinaloa Middle2.5 mi5225.6%53.7%−2.51.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195480#40323.5%53.3%9.3%5.9%+7.7pp
20224569#66618.8%46.2%16.9%6.4%+0.4pp
20234458#91619.4%43.1%19.2%8.4%-7.7pp
20244261#85718.8%40.3%11.3%1.5%+2.4pp
20253946#120920.5%42.3%17.9%2.7%-9.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.2%19.8%+9.6pp
Male8.6%16.1%+7.5pp
Asian4.2%12.5%+8.3pp
Black/African American13.6%46.7%+33.1pp
Hispanic/Latino9.8%16.8%+7.0pp
Two or More Races18.9%32.4%+13.5pp
Students with Disabilities21.8%23.1%+1.3pp
English Learners9.4%22.9%+13.5pp
Homeless35.7%34.2%-1.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.6%22.1%+9.5pp
All Students9.3%17.9%+8.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction