ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Anaheim

Running Springs Academy: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Running Springs Academy posts 69% meeting the standard, and 43.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

8670 East Running Springs Drive, 92808 (opens in new tab)·Orange Unified·Anaheim·Grades TK-8·643 students·30% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 281-4512·Website
Scope Score
69
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #560 statewide · #6 of 27 in Orange Unified

Running Springs Academy scores 69 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 90th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “69% proficient” and call it done. Running Springs Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Anaheim, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Running Springs Academy's low-income kids hit 54.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

37%
29%
34%
Grade 3 · 66% proficient
51%
17%
32%
Grade 4 · 68% proficient
51%
23%
26%
Grade 5 · 74% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 13.6pp across grades; the floor rises 7.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

54.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Running Springs Academy's most underrated number

54.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Running Springs Academy low-income: 54.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
43.8%
State 21.3%
22.5pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
68.5%
State 42.7%
25.9pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-1.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Chronic absenteeism
10.6%
State 17.9%
7.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
39.5%
State 18.0%
21.5pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Running Springs Academy
69/100
This school
High School

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic29.9%
White31.9%
Asian21.5%
Black1.4%
Other15.4%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 30.0% (34pp below CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
643
Near CA avg (~620)
Transitional Kindergarten
62 TK students
10% of a 644-student campus · CDE Census Day 2025-26
Student-Teacher Ratio
27:1
6 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$17,377
District avg: $13,360 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
39.5% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$65,014 – $136,010
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Running Springs Academy in Anaheim, 54.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 46.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Running Springs Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (50.4% Math proficient); White students (69.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 113 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Disabilities+12.3pp
22.9% vs 10.6% overall · n=105
Math · Hispanic−19.9pp
49.9% vs 69.9% overall · n=97
3 more gaps by subject
ELA · Low-Income−19.1pp
52.5% vs 71.6% overall · n=113
ELA Exceeded · Low-Income−15.1pp
29.9% vs 45.1% overall · n=113
Math Exceeded · Hispanic−14.8pp
28.4% vs 43.2% overall · n=97

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income113 tested
ELA 54.0%·Math 50.4%· +7.7pp vs district
White115 tested
ELA 69.6%·Math 69.6%· -3.1pp vs district
Hispanic97 tested
ELA 54.6%·Math 51.5%· +8.5pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +12.8pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 58%Support 39%Other 2%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$158K
$73K above CA median
Median Home Value
$1.07M
$410K above CA median
Bachelor's+
59%
24pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
19.9 years avg experience
28 teachers · 7% first-year
Teacher Credentials
100% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

Frequently asked questions

Is Running Springs Academy a good elementary school?
Running Springs Academy has a Scope Score of 69 out of 100, placing it in the 90th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #560 statewide. 43.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 22.5 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Running Springs Academy's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 68.5% of students at Running Springs Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 43.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 43.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 508 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Running Springs Academy rank in California?
Running Springs Academy ranks #560 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 90th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Running Springs Academy getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Running Springs Academy decreases by 1.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Running Springs Academy?
10.6% of students at Running Springs Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Running Springs Academy compare to other schools in Anaheim?
Running Springs Academy scores 69/100 (90th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 643 students. Use the schools in Anaheim page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Running Springs Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Running Springs Academy in Anaheim, 54.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 46.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Running Springs Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (50.4% Math proficient); White students (69.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 113 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
43.8%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 72th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
68.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 70th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 15%
-1.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 59th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
10.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
39.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 80th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38437%29%15%19%65%+22
Grade 47751%17%22%10%68%+23
Grade 59351%23%17%10%73%+25
Grade 69042%38%18%2%80%+33
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38437%36%20%7%73%+27
Grade 47742%29%27%3%70%+29
Grade 59346%16%20%17%62%+27
Grade 69048%27%13%12%74%+39
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/119335%29%34%1%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11354.0%+8+16
White11569.6%−3+8
Hispanic/Latino9754.6%+9+16
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Running Springs Academy ←6943.8%68.5%−1.30.1%
Bryant Ranch Elementary1.6 mi8154.7%79.9%−2.60.1%
Anaheim Hills Elementary3 mi8050.0%80.3%+6.00.1%
Travis Ranch2.7 mi6546.4%68.9%−10.00.4%
California average4321.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
65%69%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #780 → #774 → #808 → #331 → #560
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue