Running Springs Academy: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Running Springs Academy posts 69% meeting the standard, and 43.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
Running Springs Academy scores 69 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 90th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “69% proficient” and call it done. Running Springs Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Anaheim, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Running Springs Academy's low-income kids hit 54.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 13.6pp across grades; the floor rises 7.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Running Springs Academy's most underrated number
54.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +12.8pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
Frequently asked questions
Is Running Springs Academy a good elementary school?
What are Running Springs Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does Running Springs Academy rank in California?
Is Running Springs Academy getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Running Springs Academy?
How does Running Springs Academy compare to other schools in Anaheim?
How does Running Springs Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 84 | 37% | 29% | 15% | 19% | 65% | +22 |
| Grade 4 | 77 | 51% | 17% | 22% | 10% | 68% | +23 |
| Grade 5 | 93 | 51% | 23% | 17% | 10% | 73% | +25 |
| Grade 6 | 90 | 42% | 38% | 18% | 2% | 80% | +33 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 84 | 37% | 36% | 20% | 7% | 73% | +27 |
| Grade 4 | 77 | 42% | 29% | 27% | 3% | 70% | +29 |
| Grade 5 | 93 | 46% | 16% | 20% | 17% | 62% | +27 |
| Grade 6 | 90 | 48% | 27% | 13% | 12% | 74% | +39 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 93 | 35% | 29% | 34% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 113 | 54.0% | +8 | +16 |
| White | 115 | 69.6% | −3 | +8 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 97 | 54.6% | +9 | +16 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Running Springs Academy ← | — | 69 | 43.8% | 68.5% | −1.3 | 0.1% |
| Bryant Ranch Elementary | 1.6 mi | 81 | 54.7% | 79.9% | −2.6 | 0.1% |
| Anaheim Hills Elementary | 3 mi | 80 | 50.0% | 80.3% | +6.0 | 0.1% |
| Travis Ranch | 2.7 mi | 65 | 46.4% | 68.9% | −10.0 | 0.4% |
| California average | — | 43 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.