School district · Orange County

Orange Unified schools

Orange Unified’s 27 public elementary schools run from the 21st to the 98th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). They sit in all four bands, from Strong to Needs Support.

Elementary · 27 schools

from 21st to 98th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Anaheim Hills Elementary: 98th percentile, Strong
  • Crescent Elementary: 97th percentile, Strong
  • Panorama Elementary: 92nd percentile, Strong
  • Nohl Canyon Elementary: 92nd percentile, Strong
  • Chapman Hills Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Villa Park Elementary: 89th percentile, Strong
  • Running Springs Academy: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Fletcher Mandarin Language & GATE Academy: 84th percentile, Strong
  • McPherson Magnet: 84th percentile, Strong
  • Serrano Elementary: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Linda Vista Elementary: 79th percentile, Strong
  • La Veta Elementary: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Imperial Elementary: 76th percentile, Strong
  • Palmyra GATE Magnet: 71st percentile, Solid
  • Canyon Rim Elementary: 69th percentile, Solid
  • Taft Elementary: 62nd percentile, Solid
  • California iInspire Academy: 48th percentile, Developing
  • Sycamore Elementary: 47th percentile, Developing
  • West Orange Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Olive Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Jordan Academy of Language and Computer Science: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Cambridge Elementary: 40th percentile, Developing
  • Esplanade Elementary: 39th percentile, Developing
  • Handy Elementary: 38th percentile, Developing
  • Fairhaven Elementary: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • Prospect Elementary: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Lampson Elementary: 21st percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
8Developing
3Solid
13Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 7 schools

from 44th to 95th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • El Rancho Charter: 95th percentile, Strong
  • McPherson Magnet: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Cerro Villa Middle: 77th percentile, Strong
  • OUSD EDGE Virtual Academy: 75th percentile, Strong
  • Santiago Charter Middle: 62nd percentile, Solid
  • Portola Middle: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Yorba Middle: 44th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
2Developing
1Solid
4Strong

High · 5 schools

from 28th to 88th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Canyon High: 88th percentile, Strong
  • OUSD EDGE Virtual Academy: 67th percentile, Solid
  • El Modena High: 65th percentile, Solid
  • Villa Park High: 64th percentile, Solid
  • Orange High: 28th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
3Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 2 of the 37 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 37 ranked schools
  • 3 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Orange Unified

40 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Orange Unified score highest?

Anaheim Hills Elementary is highest, at the 98th percentile.

That’s higher than 98 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Orange Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 24 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Orange Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Orange Unified score highest?

El Rancho Charter is highest, at the 95th percentile.

That’s higher than 95 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Orange Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

  • El Rancho CharterAnaheim · Broad base · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    95thStrongScope Score 74
  • McPherson MagnetOrange · Magnet school. Check how it admits students.
    88thStrongScope Score 63
  • Cerro Villa MiddleVilla Park
    77thStrongScope Score 52
Show the other 4 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Orange Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Orange Unified score highest?

Canyon High is highest, at the 88th percentile.

That’s higher than 88 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Orange Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 2 high schools
Context

The average high school in Orange Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

3 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools, special education centers and court and community schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with its own kind or not ranked.

  • Richland Continuation HighContinuation high school: compared only with other continuation schools
  • Canyon HillsSpecial education center: students are placed here by an IEP team, not by address and not by lottery, so we don’t rank it
  • OUSD Community DayCommunity day school: students are placed here by probation, district or voluntary referral, including after an expulsion, so we don’t rank it

The district

Where does Orange Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Orange Unified spent $18,412 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Orange Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction60%
  • Instruction support14%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$438.1 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 50 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s all of its general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 196 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 80% of the money; their titles are below. The plan itself puts 82% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

8 of the plan’s 50 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Math $0.3 million
  • Catch-up help $5.2 million
  • English learners $4.7 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • EL Academic Support Services$3.2 million
  • Secondary Academic Support$1.5 million
  • EL and Academic Language Professional Development$1.1 million
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $42.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $55.6 million and estimates it spent $41.6 million, $14.0 million (25%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $14.0 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $34.8 million (9%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. We couldn’t match $273.4 million of this $438.1 million plan to individual actions in last year’s plan. These lists cover the rest.

Largest cuts

  • Special Education Programs, Supports, Staff and Supplies−⁠$83.8 million
  • Textbooks−⁠$8.0 million
  • Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)−⁠$3.4 million

Largest increases

  • Expanded Learning and Summer Enrichment+⁠$10.1 million
  • Elementary Support+⁠$4.6 million
  • Maintain Infrastructure: Business, Human Resources, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation+⁠$4.0 million

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • High Quality Educators and Staff: Targeted Professional Learning for Academic Recovery$271.3 million
  • Assessment and Ed. Tech Support$1.3 million

Ask: What did Special Education Programs, Supports, Staff and Supplies pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $83.8 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Academic Performance57%57%no change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 244%46%up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2 · Academic Engagement16 in 10016 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoals 2 and 31.0%0.8%down 0.2 pts

Goal 4 isn’t shown because it tracks named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • High Quality Educators and Staff: Targeted Professional Learning for Academic Recovery · $271,296,074
  • Maintain Infrastructure: Business, Human Resources, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation · $60,245,015
  • Expanded Learning and Summer Enrichment · $20,089,998
The full plan4 goals, 71 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($438.1 million).

Where does the money go?

86% to Goal 3, Conditions & Climate. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Academic Performance$36.8 million8% of action budgets

“Orange Unified is focused on continuous improvement of student academic outcomes to prepare them for success for college and/​or career” p. 25 ↗

22 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $38.7 million (−⁠$1.8 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Elementary Support$8.3 millionaction 1.6 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)$8.1 millionaction 1.17 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.6 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Career Technical Education$5.1 millionaction 1.8 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.5 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Elementary Resource Teachers$4.6 millionaction 1.16 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. EL Academic Support Services$3.2 millionaction 1.2 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $824,090 is state funding counted toward those services

16 more funded actions in this goal

  • Secondary Academic Support · action 1.18 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.5 million
  • Assessment and Ed. Tech Support · action 1.25 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • EL and Academic Language Professional Development · action 1.1 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $550,370 is state funding counted toward those services$1.1 million
  • Early Learning and Elementary Support · action 1.5 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $538,424 is state funding counted toward those services$0.7 million
  • Professional Development and Support for Core Subjects · action 1.4 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $23,381 is state funding counted toward those services$0.6 million
  • P21 Specialists · action 1.19 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Mathmatics Support Services · action 1.7 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) · action 1.11 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • College and Career Readiness · action 1.9 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $112,170 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Special Education Instruction Specialists · action 1.20 · p. 149 ↗$0.3 million
  • Science Center · action 1.12 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Student Achievement Data Analysis, Progress Monitoring Software, Student Achievement Committee, and Student Achievement Professional Learning · action 1.22 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $162,500 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • STEAM Education · action 1.23 · p. 150 ↗$0.2 million
  • EL and Academic Language Supplemental Resources · action 1.3 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Innovative Learning-Educational Technology · action 1.21 · p. 149 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Foster Youth Support · action 1.14 · p. 149 ↗under $0.1 million

1 more action is in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 149 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Elementary Support+⁠$4.6 million$3.7 million → $8.3 million · p. 148 ↗
  2. Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)−⁠$3.4 million$11.5 million → $8.1 million · p. 149 ↗
  3. Secondary Academic Support−⁠$1.8 million$3.3 million → $1.5 million · p. 149 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Career Technical Education · $5.4 million → $5.1 million · p. 149 ↗−⁠$0.3 million
  • Elementary Resource Teachers · $3.9 million → $4.6 million · p. 149 ↗+⁠$0.7 million
  • EL Academic Support Services · $3.3 million → $3.2 million · p. 148 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Assessment and Ed. Tech Support · $1.3 million · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • EL and Academic Language Professional Development · $1.3 million → $1.1 million · p. 148 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Early Learning and Elementary Support · $1.6 million → $0.7 million · p. 148 ↗−⁠$0.9 million
  • Professional Development and Support for Core Subjects · $71,118 → $573,381 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$502,263
  • P21 Specialists · $338,272 → $428,004 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$89,732
  • Mathmatics Support Services · $349,319 · p. 148 ↗new or renamed
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) · $255,339 → $326,000 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$70,661
  • College and Career Readiness · $1.1 million → $0.3 million · p. 149 ↗−⁠$0.8 million
  • Special Education Instruction Specialists · $266,999 → $295,237 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$28,238
  • Science Center · $176,207 → $190,980 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$14,773
  • Student Achievement Data Analysis, Progress Monitoring Software, Student Achievement Committee, and Student Achievement Professional Learning · $296,838 → $177,500 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$119,338
  • STEAM Education · $137,495 → $170,860 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$33,365
  • EL and Academic Language Supplemental Resources · $142,000 → $80,000 · p. 148 ↗−⁠$62,000
  • Title not confirmed · $53,125 · p. 149 ↗not compared
  • Innovative Learning-Educational Technology · $60,800 → $45,724 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$15,076
  • Foster Youth Support · $25,699 → $18,507 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$7,192

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 23 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 25 ↗.

Goal 2Academic Engagement$23.6 million5% of action budgets

“Orange Unified is committed to the wellbeing and engagement of all our students” p. 61 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $13.1 million (+⁠$10.5 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Expanded Learning and Summer Enrichment$20.1 millionaction 2.2 · p. 150 ↗
  2. Additional Health Supports$2.0 millionaction 2.6 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Increase Attendance and Enrollment Rates$0.6 millionaction 2.3 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Student and Community Services Administrator$0.4 millionaction 2.4 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Engaging,Rigorous and Student Centered Learning Environments$0.3 millionaction 2.1 · p. 150 ↗

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Student Intervention Resources and Support · action 2.7 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Expanded Learning and Summer Enrichment+⁠$10.1 million$10.0 million → $20.1 million · p. 150 ↗
  2. Increase Attendance and Enrollment Rates+⁠$245,213$365,156 → $610,369 · p. 150 ↗
  3. Additional Health Supports+⁠$0.2 million$1.9 million → $2.0 million · p. 150 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Student and Community Services Administrator · $281,069 → $404,150 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$123,081
  • Engaging,Rigorous and Student Centered Learning Environments · $236,206 → $257,385 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$21,179
  • Student Intervention Resources and Support · $209,000 → $202,608 · p. 150 ↗−⁠$6,392

How the plan measures it · 13 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 61 ↗.

Goal 3Conditions & Climate$377.2 million86% of action budgets

“Orange Unified maintains strong conditions and climates that directly support efficient and effective teaching and learning environments for our students and staff as well as a welcoming atmosphere for our families and our community” p. 76 ↗

19 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. High Quality Educators and Staff: Targeted Professional Learning for Academic Recovery$271.3 millionaction 3.12 · p. 151 ↗
  2. Maintain Infrastructure: Business, Human Resources, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation$60.2 millionaction 3.16 · p. 152 ↗
  3. Technology: Infrastructure, Devices$13.7 millionaction 3.22 · p. 152 ↗
  4. School site allocations$7.8 millionaction 3.1 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $5.5 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Safe and Welcoming Schools$7.2 millionaction 3.5 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.0 million is state funding counted toward those services

14 more funded actions in this goal

  • Special Education Programs, Supports, Staff and Supplies · action 3.7 · p. 151 ↗$3.9 million
  • Counseling Services · action 3.6 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.7 million
  • Community Schools, including Native American Students and Families · action 3.21 · p. 152 ↗$3.6 million
  • Administrative Support for Categorical Programs · action 3.2 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.0 million is state funding counted toward those services$2.5 million
  • Textbooks · action 3.9 · p. 151 ↗$1.8 million
  • Teacher Preparation and Support · action 3.10 · p. 151 ↗$0.4 million
  • Communication Tools and Resources · action 3.11 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $75,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Parent and Family Engagement · action 3.14 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Foster Youth Coordinator · action 3.3 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $126,048 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Technology, Devices · action 3.8 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Early Learning Partnerships · action 3.19 · p. 152 ↗$0.1 million
  • LCAP Survey · action 3.15 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $58,800 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Interpreter · action 3.18 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Climate Survey · action 3.13 · p. 151 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Special Education Programs, Supports, Staff and Supplies−⁠$83.8 million$87.7 million → $3.9 million · p. 151 ↗
  2. Textbooks−⁠$8.0 million$9.7 million → $1.8 million · p. 151 ↗
  3. Maintain Infrastructure: Business, Human Resources, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation+⁠$4.0 million$56.2 million → $60.2 million · p. 152 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • High Quality Educators and Staff: Targeted Professional Learning for Academic Recovery · $271.3 million · p. 151 ↗new or renamed
  • Technology: Infrastructure, Devices · $12.1 million → $13.7 million · p. 152 ↗+⁠$1.6 million
  • School site allocations · $7.4 million → $7.8 million · p. 150 ↗+⁠$0.5 million
  • Safe and Welcoming Schools · $6.7 million → $7.2 million · p. 151 ↗+⁠$0.6 million
  • Counseling Services · $3.0 million → $3.7 million · p. 151 ↗+⁠$0.7 million
  • Community Schools, including Native American Students and Families · $5.0 million → $3.6 million · p. 152 ↗−⁠$1.4 million
  • Administrative Support for Categorical Programs · $2.9 million → $2.5 million · p. 151 ↗−⁠$0.4 million
  • Teacher Preparation and Support · $331,423 → $386,576 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$55,153
  • Communication Tools and Resources · $325,000 · p. 151 ↗new or renamed
  • Parent and Family Engagement · $18,661 → $214,903 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$196,242
  • Foster Youth Coordinator · $187,144 → $189,071 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$1,927
  • Technology, Devices · $100,000 · p. 151 ↗new or renamed
  • Early Learning Partnerships · $87,365 → $88,763 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$1,398
  • LCAP Survey · $20,000 → $65,600 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$45,600
  • Interpreter · $500 → $20,000 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$19,500
  • Climate Survey · $16,000 → $16,000 · p. 151 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 24 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 76 ↗.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEquity Multiplier Funds$588,911under 1% of action budgets

“Within three years, all students, and particularly low-income, EL, and Hispanic students, at Richland Continuation High School and our OUSD Community Day School, will demonstrate growth towards meeting or exceeding standards in Math as measured by CAASPP test results (Richland only) and local benchmark assessments. In addition, the percentage of EL students making progress toward English language proficiency will exceed 14.5% achieved in 2023. The percentage of all students including low-income, EL and Hispanic students prepared for college and career will exceed the.8% from 2023” p. 103 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $279,492 (+⁠$309,419)

Largest funded actions

  1. Support for English Learners$326,340action 4.1 · p. 153 ↗
  2. Academic and Wellness Support for CDS and Richland$212,197action 4.3 · p. 153 ↗
  3. Support to Increase Student Engagement and Reduce Chronic Absenteeism at Richland$50,374action 4.2 · p. 153 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Support for English Learners+⁠$296,704$29,636 → $326,340 · p. 153 ↗
  2. Support to Increase Student Engagement and Reduce Chronic Absenteeism at Richland+⁠$33,970$16,404 → $50,374 · p. 153 ↗
  3. Academic and Wellness Support for CDS and Richland−⁠$13,651$225,848 → $212,197 · p. 153 ↗

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 3 quoted

  • CAASPP - Math Low Socio Econ (Richland): *Improve 3 points per year p. 104 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 233.7 status points below standard
    Target for year 3
    224.7 status points below standard
  • Suspension Rate (CDS): *Reduce.3% per year p. 106 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 23.8%
    Target for year 3
    22.9% suspension rate in 2025-26 CADashboard
  • Attendance Rate (CDS): *Increase 1.5% per year p. 106 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-24 86.78% Attendance Rate
    Target for year 3
    90% Attendance Rate - April 2027

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 24,960 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 58%2. White: 22%3. Asian: 10%4. Two or more races: 4%5. Filipino: 2%6. Not reported: 2%7. Black or African American: 1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino58%
  2. White22%
  3. Asian10%
  4. Two or more races4%
  5. Filipino2%
  6. Not reported2%
  7. Black or African American1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

58%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 14,360 of 24,927 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Orange Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 50% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,299 of 2,600 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (8)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Orange Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Anaheim Hills Elementary, 98th percentile (Strong). Middle: El Rancho Charter, 95th percentile (Strong). High: Canyon High, 88th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Orange Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Orange Unified good?

Orange Unified’s 27 public elementary schools run from the 21st to the 98th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 13 Strong, 3 Solid, 8 Developing and 3 Needs Support. Orange Unified’s 7 public middle schools run from the 44th to the 95th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 1 Solid and 2 Developing. Orange Unified’s 5 public high schools run from the 28th to the 88th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 3 Solid and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Orange Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Orange Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Orange Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Orange Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Orange Unified spend per student?

Orange Unified spent $18,412 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Orange Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Orange Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $438.1 million into 50 funded actions in 4 goals, all of its general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $377.2 million, 86% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Orange Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.