Anaheim Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Anaheim Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Anaheim Hillshigher than 99 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 80% and 86% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 156 in English, 157 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
59%
Proficient
27%
Below Proficient
14%
86% proficient or advanced · 157 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
59%
21%
28%
Proficient
27%
21%
24%
Developing
10%
25%
24%
Minimal
4%
33%
24%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
58%
Proficient
29%
Below Proficient
13%
87% proficient or advanced · 67 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
58%
20%
29%
Proficient
29%
28%
34%
Developing
6%
24%
22%
Minimal
7%
28%
15%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
70%
Proficient
15%
Below Proficient
15%
85% proficient or advanced · 67 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
70%
21%
32%
Proficient
15%
16%
18%
Developing
9%
25%
25%
Minimal
6%
38%
25%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–6 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Accelerated in English and Exceptional in math.grades 4–6 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–6: 185 in English, 184 in math
Comparison
185 students in English and 184 in math in grades 4–6 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
47% in English and 59% in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
47%English · exceeded the standard59%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 156 in English, 157 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Low-income students here (54 tested, grades 3–6, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (36% and 30%).grades 3–6 · spring 2026
76%English · met or exceeded72%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–6: 54
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 54 students.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school80%
California46%
Tested: 156 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school80%
Orange Unified56%
Tested: 156 here · 4,966 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
47%
24%
32%
Proficient
33%
22%
24%
Developing
17%
21%
21%
Minimal
3%
33%
23%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school86%
California42%
Tested: 157 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school86%
Orange Unified52%
Tested: 157 here · 4,974 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
59%
21%
28%
Proficient
27%
21%
24%
Developing
10%
25%
24%
Minimal
4%
33%
24%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school87%
California48%
Tested: 67 here · 415,439 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school87%
Orange Unified63%
Tested: 67 here · 1,779 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
58%
20%
29%
Proficient
29%
28%
34%
Developing
6%
24%
22%
Minimal
7%
28%
15%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school85%
California37%
Tested: 67 here · 415,904 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school85%
Orange Unified50%
Tested: 67 here · 1,783 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
70%
21%
32%
Proficient
15%
16%
18%
Developing
9%
25%
25%
Minimal
6%
38%
25%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Grades 3–5 are well above California. Grade 6 are also well above it.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Anaheim HillsCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID80%46%
Anaheim HillsCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Anaheim HillsCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID86%42%
Anaheim HillsCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 71% in 2017 to 80% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Math went from 69% in 2017 to 86% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Anaheim Hills
California
2015
68% 222 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
74% 217 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
71% 227 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
79% 205 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
74% 194 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
87% 212 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
85% 212 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
76% 192 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
80% 192 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
80% 156 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Anaheim Hills
California
2015
55% 227 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
74% 218 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
69% 226 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
69% 204 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
74% 194 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
81% 212 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
83% 212 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
79% 192 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
81% 193 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
86% 157 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure185 students in English, 184 in math · grades 4–6 · 2025
English+15ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+27ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 15 points above that prediction, and in math 27 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
4 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
12in 100 at the average Orange Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
20 of 440 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school4 in 100
at the average Orange Unified school12 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0of 443 students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
0.2%at the average Orange Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–6 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
54 tested per subject
English
76% / 36%
Math
72% / 30%
White
72 tested per subject
English
86% / 60%
Math
88% / 54%
Hispanic or Latino
50 tested per subject
English
72% / 37%
Math
70% / 30%
Asian
48 English · 49 math tested · grades 3 and 4 and 6
English
81% / 70%
Math
94% / 72%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–6 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Orange Unified
vs California
Low-income · 54 tested
English
76%
+3244%
■+4036%
Math
72%
+3735%
■+4230%
White · 72 tested
English
86%
+1571%
+2660%
Math
88%
+2266%
+3454%
Hispanic or Latino · 50 tested
English
72%
+2745%
■+3537%
Math
70%
+3436%
■+4030%
Asian · 48 tested in English, 49 in math · grades 3 and 4 and 6 only
English
81%
−485%
+1170%
Math
94%
+886%
+2272%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Orange Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Students of two or more races: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students here did far better than the same groups statewide.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Anaheim Hills Elementary in Anaheim, 75.9% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 44.4% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Anaheim Hills Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 31.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (72.2% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (86.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 14.1 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 54 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1White29%
2Asian28%
3Hispanic or Latino20%
4Two or more races12%
5Filipino6%
6Not reported4%
7Black or African American—
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
White
29%
Asian
28%
Hispanic or Latino
20%
Two or more races
12%
Filipino
6%
Not reported
4%
Black or African American
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (19%, 89 of 476). California: 63%.
100% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 100.00%: 17.6 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 17.6 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Orange Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 10.7–26.7% meal eligibility and 238–952 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Anaheim Hills Elementary a good elementary school?
Anaheim Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 86 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Anaheim Hills Elementary was well above California in English and math: 80% and 86% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Anaheim Hills Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 80% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 86% the math standard; 47% and 59% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 156 students were tested in English and 157 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Anaheim Hills Elementary rank in California?
Anaheim Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Anaheim Hills Elementary ranks #57 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Anaheim Hills Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Anaheim Hills Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 98th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Anaheim Hills Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 4.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 20 chronically absent of 440 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.0%; 0 unduplicated suspended students of 443 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 5.6%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.1%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Anaheim Hills Elementary compare to other schools in Anaheim?
Anaheim Hills Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 476 students. Use the schools in Anaheim page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Anaheim Hills Elementary?
At Anaheim Hills Elementary in Anaheim, 75.9% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 44.4% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Anaheim Hills Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 31.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (72.2% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (86.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 14.1 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 54 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Anaheim Hills Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Anaheim Hills Elementary is zoned to El Rancho Charter. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 79 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 81 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈98th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 68 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 2.8pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 63 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 89 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
51
45%
39%
16%
0%
84%
+41
Grade 4
46
28%
39%
26%
7%
67%
+23
Grade 5
59
64%
22%
10%
3%
86%
+38
Grade 6
67
58%
28%
6%
7%
87%
+41
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
52
54%
37%
6%
4%
90%
+44
Grade 4
46
48%
26%
22%
4%
74%
+33
Grade 5
59
71%
20%
5%
3%
92%
+56
Grade 6
67
70%
15%
9%
6%
85%
+50
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
64
79.7%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
62
72.6%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
66
86.4%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
60
90.0%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
64
82.8%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
62
72.6%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
67
88.1%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
61
78.7%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
64
64.1%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
69
73.9%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
59
91.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
76
85.5%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
64
75.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
69
75.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
59
88.1%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
76
84.2%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
75
82.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
61
77.0%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
76
94.7%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
67
77.6%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
75
80.0%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
61
77.0%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
76
89.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
67
85.1%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
66
80.3%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
79
82.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
67
98.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
55
69.1%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
66
78.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
79
74.7%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
67
89.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
55
69.1%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
50
76.0%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
65
72.3%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
79
74.7%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
68
86.8%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
50
72.0%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
65
76.9%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
79
73.4%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
68
82.3%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
65
78.5%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
75
77.3%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
65
81.5%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
86
87.2%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
64
82.8%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
75
72.0%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
65
50.8%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
81
80.3%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
76
67.1%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
66
69.7%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
85
76.5%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
64
78.1%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
76
69.7%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
66
66.7%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
84
71.4%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
65
63.1%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
74
61%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
80
84%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
63
78%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
96
74%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
74
70%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
81
79%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
63
71%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
96
66%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
69
62%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
63
73%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
90
69%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
71
79%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
73
59%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
63
62%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
91
48%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
71
69%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
59
47%
25%
27%
0%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
54
75.9%
+32
+40
White
72
86.1%
+15
+26
Hispanic/Latino
50
72.0%
+27
+35
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
72/100
92
#405
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
51.7%
74.2%
4.9%
0.1%
+0.1pp
2022
—
—
—
52.0%
84.0%
15.4%
0.5%
+14.5pp
2023
—
—
—
55.3%
83.5%
11.6%
0.1%
+10.8pp
2024
—
—
—
47.9%
78.0%
9.3%
0.5%
+20.3pp
2025
—
—
—
50.0%
80.3%
8.4%
0.1%
+6.0pp
2026
86
99
#57
51.8%
82.3%
5.6%
0.1%
+1.6pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
2.6%
5.8%
+3.2pp
Male
5.8%
3.2%
-2.6pp
Asian
4.9%
3.3%
-1.6pp
Filipino
7.7%
0.0%
-7.7pp
Hispanic/Latino
5.4%
5.6%
+0.2pp
Two or More Races
0.0%
1.9%
+1.9pp
White
4.5%
7.8%
+3.3pp
Students with Disabilities
10.9%
10.8%
-0.1pp
English Learners
4.4%
0.0%
-4.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
10.9%
10.2%
-0.7pp
All Students
4.4%
4.5%
+0.1pp
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+15
185
Accelerated
+27
184
Exceptional
English Only
+13
158
not categorised
+26
157
not categorised
White
+12
68
Accelerated
+20
67
Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+13
46
Accelerated
+24
46
Exceptional
Asian
+23
41
Exceptional
+43
41
Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino
+6
33
Accelerated
+13
33
Accelerated
Students with Disabilities
+1
19
Average
+21
19
Exceptional
English Learner
+16
18
Accelerated
+32
18
Exceptional
Two or More Races
+11
17
Accelerated
+30
17
Exceptional
Filipino
+14
15
Accelerated
+16
15
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+16
15
not categorised
+29
15
not categorised
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
36%
exceeded standard · 64% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 64 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
64%
exceeded standard · 86% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 59 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 59 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
185 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 89th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.89th pctile · +15 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
184 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +27 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 97th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.97th pctile · +27 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$13,360 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 25,420 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,127 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 476
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,412 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 59%Instruction support 14%Student services 12%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 9%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 92807
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 92807
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$138,741
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
49.17%
ZCTA population
37,296
Median age
42.3 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.