ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Richard Henry Dana Elementary · Dana Point

Richard Henry Dana Elementary: 59% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 43%. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.

Richard Henry Dana posts 59% meeting the standard, against 43% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.

24242 La Cresta Drive, 92629 (opens in new tab)·Capistrano Unified·Dana Point·Grades TK-5·461 students·46% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(949) 496-5784·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5445
% Exceeded33%21%
% Met+59%43%
Growth-17.2-2.9
Absence17.2%17.9%
Suspension0.5%1.6%
Scope Score
54
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #1,535 statewide · #29 of 39 in Capistrano Unified

Richard Henry Dana Elementary scores 54 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 73rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “59% proficient” and call it done. Richard Henry Dana deserves a closer read. The school sits in Dana Point, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Richard Henry Dana's low-income kids hit 50.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 33rd to the 73rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2100 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 59% of students meet the standard today, above the 37% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 341%38%54%50%64%
Grade 433%24%48%50%65%
Grade 545%56%23%46%60%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%42%57%52%71%
Grade 432%17%37%50%57%
Grade 521%41%7%26%40%

The story this school is actually telling

The floor · met or exceeded
59.5%

of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 42.7% statewide.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 3→5
17.2pp

proficiency runs 67% in this year's grade 3 against 50% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

36%
27%
37%
Grade 3 · 63% proficient
33%
33%
34%
Grade 4 · 66% proficient
29%
31%
40%
Grade 5 · 60% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.2pp across grades; the floor slips 3.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

50.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Richard Henry Dana's most underrated number

50.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Richard Henry Dana low-income: 50.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
32.6%
State 21.3%
11.3pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-17.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
59.5%
State 42.7%
16.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.2%
State 17.9%
0.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.5%
State 1.6%
1.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.6%
State 18.0%
6.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Richard Henry Dana Elementary in Dana Point, 50.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Richard Henry Dana Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 88 students tested.

All students at this school: 60% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 60%, district —, state 43%60%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 46%, district 49%, state 32%46% · −14 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 41%, district 45%, state 32%41% · −19 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 53%, district 69%, state 44%53% · −7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 68%, district 66%, state 42%68% · +8 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 82%, district 74%, state 56%82% · +23 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 29%, district 32%, state 22%29% · −31 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 15%, district 14%, state 11%15% · −45 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: too few students to report‹11
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.2%, district 13.9%, state 17.9%17.2% · −0.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.5%, district —, state 1.6%0.5% · −1.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (25.0% vs 15.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.5%
TK/K25.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 23:118:1
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience11.3 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,219 – $130,638
Principal salary$185,421 – $206,216
Superintendent salary$348,333

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,697, CA average $14,815$19,697 · spent at this school
Federal share$372 per student

$372 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,166 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support10%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,431 per pupil
2019$11,341 per pupil
2018$10,665 per pupil
2017$9,388 per pupil
2016$8,875 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic44.9%
District 26.7% · CA 56.1%
White39.3%
District 51.0% · CA 19.9%
Other14.1%
District 14.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.3%
District 7.4% · CA 10.2%
Black0.4%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 46.2% (18pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$143K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.35M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+59% · CA 35%
ZIP population25,579
Median age48 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 46% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Richard Henry Dana Elementary a good elementary school?

Richard Henry Dana Elementary has a Scope Score of 54 out of 100, placing it in the 73rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,535 statewide. 32.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Richard Henry Dana Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 59.5% of students at Richard Henry Dana Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 32.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 32.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 307 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Richard Henry Dana Elementary rank in California?

Richard Henry Dana Elementary ranks #1,535 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 73rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Richard Henry Dana Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Richard Henry Dana Elementary decreases by 17.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Richard Henry Dana Elementary?

17.2% of students at Richard Henry Dana Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Richard Henry Dana Elementary compare to other schools in Dana Point?

Richard Henry Dana Elementary scores 54/100 (73rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 461 students. Use the schools in Dana Point page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Richard Henry Dana Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Richard Henry Dana Elementary in Dana Point, 50.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Richard Henry Dana Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 88 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
32.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 61th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-17.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
59.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 63th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.5%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 42th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35536%27%11%25%64%+20
Grade 44933%33%8%27%65%+21
Grade 54829%31%23%17%60%+13
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35838%33%14%16%71%+25
Grade 44935%22%16%27%57%+16
Grade 54825%15%23%38%40%+4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/114829%17%44%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8850.0%−5+12
Hispanic/Latino8243.9%−8+5
White5787.7%+9+26
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Richard Henry Dana Elementary ←5432.6%59.5%−17.20.5%
John Malcom Elementary1.8 mi6641.1%69.4%−4.01.4%
Capistrano Home/Virtual2.2 mi6438.0%68.6%−14.20.5%
Palisades Elementary2.3 mi5733.5%61.5%+4.53.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193633#367611.6%37.4%8.4%0.1%-13.7pp
20223856#251711.4%36.4%27.4%0.5%+7.8pp
2023229#523018.6%37.6%22.5%0.4%-40.2pp
20244456#249521.9%45.7%18.9%0.2%-15.0pp
20255473#153532.6%59.5%17.2%0.5%-17.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.8%14.2%+6.4pp
Male8.8%20.0%+11.2pp
Hispanic/Latino6.4%17.5%+11.1pp
Students with Disabilities14.8%35.6%+20.8pp
English Learners5.1%17.3%+12.2pp
Homeless5.6%18.7%+13.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.0%19.7%+11.7pp
All Students8.3%17.1%+8.8pp
Filipino43.2%
Two or More Races14.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction