ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Phillips Elementary · Napa

Phillips Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Phillips posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1210 Shetler Avenue, 94559 (opens in new tab)·Napa Valley Unified·Napa·Grades TK-5·373 students·88% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(707) 253-3481·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3245
% Exceeded7%21%
% Met+22%43%
Growth-3.9-2.9
Absence17.0%17.9%
Suspension2.0%1.6%
Scope Score
32
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,459 statewide · #14 of 17 in Napa Valley Unified

Phillips Elementary scores 32 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 22nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “22% proficient” and call it done. Phillips deserves a closer read. The school sits in Napa, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 12th to the 22nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 22% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 322%26%19%28%23%
Grade 430%24%30%12%20%
Grade 519%25%26%27%23%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 333%26%15%24%29%
Grade 430%17%25%13%17%
Grade 59%7%16%15%21%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
15%
77%
Grade 3 · 23% proficient
13%
80%
Grade 4 · 20% proficient
8%
15%
77%
Grade 5 · 23% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.3%
State 21.3%
14.1pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-3.9pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
21.9%
State 42.7%
20.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.0%
State 17.9%
0.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.0%
State 1.6%
0.4pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.6%
State 18.0%
6.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Phillips Elementary in Napa, 20.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Phillips Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 14.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 166 students tested.

All students at this school: 22% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 22%, district —, state 43%22%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 26%, state 32%20% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 21%, district 27%, state 32%21% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 22%, district 36%, state 42%22% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 7%, state 11%9% · −12 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 22%, district 38%, state 44%22% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 14%, state 15%8% · −13 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 18%, district 27%, state 46%18% · −4 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 1.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.0%, district 20.1%, state 17.9%17.0% · −0.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.0%, district —, state 1.6%2.0% · +0.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (23.5% vs 13.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.3%
TK/K23.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 24:125:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience12.9 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,598 – $126,977
Principal salary$164,516 – $178,111
Superintendent salary$386,157

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,956, CA average $14,815$16,956 · spent at this school
Federal share$485 per student

$485 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,390 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,008 per pupil
2019$11,856 per pupil
2018$12,313 per pupil
2017$11,122 per pupil
2016$11,221 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic91.7%
District 58.6% · CA 56.1%
White4.6%
District 24.2% · CA 19.9%
Other2.1%
District 12.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.8%
District 2.8% · CA 10.2%
Black0.8%
District 2.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 88.5% (25pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$105K · CA $85K
Median home value$899K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+39% · CA 35%
ZIP population27,714
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 8% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Phillips Elementary a good elementary school?

Phillips Elementary has a Scope Score of 32 out of 100, placing it in the 22nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,459 statewide. 7.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.1 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Phillips Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 21.9% of students at Phillips Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 378 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Phillips Elementary rank in California?

Phillips Elementary ranks #4,459 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Phillips Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Phillips Elementary decreases by 3.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Phillips Elementary?

17.0% of students at Phillips Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Phillips Elementary compare to other schools in Napa?

Phillips Elementary scores 32/100 (22nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 373 students. Use the schools in Napa page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Phillips Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Phillips Elementary in Napa, 20.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Phillips Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 14.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 14.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 166 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
7.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 36th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-3.9pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
21.9%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 34th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.0%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.0%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 47th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 42th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3628%15%27%50%23%−21
Grade 4707%13%27%53%20%−25
Grade 5538%15%23%55%23%−25
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36311%17%24%48%29%−17
Grade 4723%14%33%50%17%−25
Grade 5587%14%21%59%21%−15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11592%7%49%42%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16620.5%−14−18
Hispanic/Latino17219.2%−13−20
English Learners977.2%+1−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Phillips Elementary ←327.3%21.9%−3.92.0%
Alta Heights Elementary1.4 mi4617.1%41.2%−1.61.5%
Stone Bridge1.3 mi4111.7%30.6%+5.00.2%
Napa Valley Independent Studies3.1 mi349.5%31.9%1.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192712#48706.1%24.0%13.6%0.2%-13.5pp
20222315#48575.0%20.8%32.3%2.5%-9.9pp
20233129#40905.0%21.7%32.9%2.2%+4.4pp
2024258#52525.1%19.7%20.9%4.0%-5.5pp
20253222#44597.3%21.9%17.0%2.0%-3.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female17.6%13.2%-4.4pp
Male10.4%20.2%+9.8pp
Hispanic/Latino13.3%16.4%+3.1pp
Students with Disabilities14.7%18.8%+4.1pp
English Learners11.3%12.3%+1.0pp
Military-Connected4.1%32.0%+27.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.2%17.3%+4.1pp
All Students13.7%16.9%+3.2pp
Homeless21.2%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction