Math
15%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Charter high school
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter
No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
54% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 15% in math. 39.1% graduate in four years. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(760) 241-8300
Websiteofy.org (opens in new tab)
DistrictVictor Valley Union High
PrincipalIleana Kiriakos
Grades7-12
Enrollment886 students
English
54%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
886Total enrollment
Graduation
39.1%Four-year graduation rate
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grade 11 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4% | 44% |
| 2022 | 1% | 36% |
| 2023 | 1% | 41% |
| 2024 | 7% | 43% |
| 2025 | 15% | 54% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
8%ProficientStandard Met
7%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
15%MinimalStandard Not Met
70%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
20%ProficientStandard Met
34%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
25%MinimalStandard Not Met
20%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
One in three of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.
ELA36% met or exceeded
Exceeded 12%Met 24%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 38%
Math11% met or exceeded
Exceeded 5%Met 6%Nearly Met 16%Not Met 73%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California high schools · average20% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 20 | 14% | 35% | 39.1% | 3.0% | 43.1% | 0.4% |
| CA average · High School | 54 | 20% | 43% | 92.5% | 43.0% | 23.1% | 3.3% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope2054
% Exceeded14%20%
% Met+35%43%
Grad rate39.1%92.5%
College readiness3.0%43.0%
Absence43.1%23.1%
Suspension0.4%3.3%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model splits here — the 79th percentile in reading against the 25th in math, among high schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits about at the middle of California high schools in reading, and the 25th in math. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California high school lands at −3 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −13 and +5 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 79th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.79th pctile · +10 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 25th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.25th pctile · −8 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter in Victorville, 34.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter trails its district average for low-income students by 8.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 262 students tested.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 43%23%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 31%, state 32%22% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 34%, state 32%23% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 23%, district 35%, state 44%23% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 31%, state 42%23% · −0 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 22%, district 22%, state 26%22% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 24%, district 44%, state 56%24% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 14%, district 7%, state 15%14% · −10 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 6%, state 11%5% · −19 vs school
6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California high school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
English Only49 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 49 students.+8 pts · +11 vs typical
Low-income students49 studentsLow-income students, reading: +13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California high school, 49 students.+13 pts · +18 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students36 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 36 students.+12 pts · +15 vs typical
Math
English Only49 studentsEnglish Only, math: −17 scale-score points versus expectation, against −12 for the same group at a typical California high school, 49 students.−17 pts · −5 vs typical
Low-income students49 studentsLow-income students, math: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California high school, 49 students.−4 pts · +11 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students36 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California high school, 36 students.−1 pts · +12 vs typical
this school typical California high school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
AP access · 2020-21 federal civil rights snapshot (structural, dated — newest published; biennial)
Shown, never scored
In the 2020-21 federal collection — the newest there is — Students with disabilities students were 17% of Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter's enrollment but 0% of its AP seats; ask the school what's changed since.
Hispanic47.1% AP · 62.0% enroll.
American Indian/Alaska Native0.0% AP · 0.6% enroll.
Asian5.9% AP · 0.5% enroll.
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander0.0% AP · 0.1% enroll.
Black11.8% AP · 18.1% enroll.
White17.6% AP · 12.4% enroll.
Two or more races17.6% AP · 6.3% enroll.
English learners11.8% AP · 6.5% enroll.
Students with disabilities0.0% AP · 16.8% enroll.
● share of AP enrollment vs share of total enrollment, this school only · not part of the Scope Score
Data source: U.S. Dept. of Education Office for Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection, 2020-21 (biennial; newest published)
Where graduates go
What happens after high school?
36%
Enrolled in college within a year
Class of 2023 · 42 of 118 completers · includes community colleges
118Completers
3%
Other colleges4 completers · Outside the California community college system
32%
California community colleges38 completers · Enrolled within a year
64%
Not recorded enrolled76 completers · No college enrollment in this reporting window
Destination data describes this earlier graduating class, separately from current-year test results and graduation. Percentages are rounded.
College destinations and the full graduate record
Where graduates go · 2024–25
Where graduates go
Context — never part of the Scope Score
36%
College-going rate, class of 2023
Where they went after graduation
Of Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter's class of 2023, 36% enrolled in college somewhere within a year — a CSU, a community college, a UC, or out of state.
College destination mix, class of 2023
Class of 2023: 118 completers, 36% enrolled somewhere within a year
32%
64%
University of California 0 (0%)California State University 1 (1%)California community college 38 (32%)In-state private 1 (1%)Out-of-state, 4-year 0 (0%)Out-of-state, 2-year 2 (2%)Not enrolled 76 (64%)
Percentages are computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers) from CDE-reported counts, not a CDE-native rate. Data source: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort — the newest published; National Student Clearinghouse match.
UC application funnel — one destination of six, tracked in detail because UC is the only source with 30 years of history
Applied6fall 2022, universitywide
Admitted3
Enrolled‹3
ShowHide the UC campus list
Where they landed (fall 2022)
Los Angeles ‹3
Campuses never sum to the universitywide figure — students apply to several.
UC is one road of many — the full destination mix for the class of 2023 is below. And who applied isn't who the school taught: the ratio between the two reflects the self-selected pool of students who chose to apply, not what happened in the classroom. By the state's 2023 count, 36% of this class's predecessors enrolled in college somewhere within a year. More of the class of 2023 enrolled at community colleges (38) than at UC (0).
Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2022 admissions cycle · college-going rate: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
AP subjects authorized
Authorization does not mean every course runs every year. Ask about current offerings, prerequisites, scheduling and support.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 30 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter's teachers are authorized to teach 6 of the 40 AP subjects the College Board offers — including Computer Science A, Computer Science Principles, and African American Studies.
Students per teacher30 · district 23
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience15.6 years
Fully credentialed23%
First-year teachers6%
PrincipalIleana Kiriakos
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$67,627 – $151,191
Principal salaryUp to $181,876
Superintendent salary$370,260
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Course breadth
AP exam qualifiers1 studentsCCI, participation not authorization
CTE pathway completers3 students
Advanced coursework
AP subjects taught6
ShowHide the 6 AP courses by discipline
Math & Computer Science (2)Computer Science A · Computer Science Principles
English (2)English Language and Composition · English Literature and Composition
History & Social Science (2)African American Studies · U.S. Government and Politics
+7 via online provider (EdOptions Academy) — not taught by school staff
Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, 2025 - 2026 audit year (authorization, not enrollment) · IB World Schools directory, name-matched · structural depth: 2020-21 federal snapshot, table 09
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.
43.1% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 23.1% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — the data can't say why.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 43.1%, district 30.2%, state 23.1%43.1% · +20.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.4%, district —, state 3.3%0.4% · −2.8pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
Its district spends $14,420 per student, about the same as the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $14,420, CA average $14,491$14,420 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,861 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 60%Instruction support 10%Student services 10%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 12%Other 2%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,420 per pupil
2019$13,403 per pupil
2018$13,948 per pupil
2017$10,398 per pupil
2016$8,767 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Four in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino67.6% · district 70.6% · CA 56.1%
White12.5% · district 6.2% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.1% · district 1.4% · CA 10.2%
Black13.9% · district 15.7% · CA 4.8%
Other5.9% · district 6.1% · CA 9.0%
GenderFemale 54.0% · Male 44.9% · Non-binary 1.1%
Free or reduced lunch85.5% · CA 64%
Median income$88K · CA $85K
Median home value$410K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population65,429
Median age32 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · high schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charteralternative comparison group | Charter | Developing | 14% | 35% | School being viewed | |
| Cobalt Institute of Math and Science | Public | Strong | 33% | 62% | 2.6 mi | |
| Silverado High | Public | Needs Support | 10% | 31% | 2.5 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
3 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check enrollment with this charter school
Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.
School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Charter enrollment details
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter a good high school?
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter has a Scope Score of 20 out of 100, placing it in the 49th percentile of California alternative high schools and ranked #57 in that group. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. 14.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.5 percentage points below the California average of 19.8%. The Scope Score weights 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate (25%), exceeded standard (22%), college/career readiness (20%), met or exceeded (proficient) (18%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.8% of students at Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.3% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 292 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter rank among California alternative schools?
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter ranks #57 among California alternative high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 49th percentile. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter?
43.1% of students at Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 23.1%. The suspension rate is 0.4%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter compare to other schools in Victorville?
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter scores 20/100 (49th percentile) among California alternative high schools. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 886 students. Use the schools in Victorville page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.
How does Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter in Victorville, 34.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter trails its district average for low-income students by 8.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 262 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What AP courses are offered at Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter?
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter's teachers are authorized to teach 6 of the 40 AP subjects the College Board offers, per the 2025 - 2026 AP Course Audit: African American Studies, Computer Science A, Computer Science Principles, English Language and Composition, English Literature and Composition, U.S. Government and Politics. Authorization means the school may teach a course, not that a section is running this year, and it's separate from AP exam pass rates. Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, analyzed by SchoolScope.
How many students from Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter go to UC?
UC masks this number for Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter — fewer than three enrollees in fall 2022 — a privacy protection for small cohorts, not a signal about the school. Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center).
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 6 things our score weighs
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 39.1% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 14.3% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 3.0% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 34.8% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 43.1% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.4% | 3.3% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures graduation, test performance, college readiness, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter: reading the evidence
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter posts 35% meeting the standard and 14.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 19.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter is ranked #57 of California alternative high schools.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 39.1% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 14.3% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 3.0% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 34.8% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 43.1% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.4% | 3.3% | 5% |
- Graduation rate
- ↓ vs CA 92.5% · index 0 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 19.8% · index 48 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- College readiness
- ↓ vs CA 43.0% · index 32 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 43.2% · index 49 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 23.1% · index 39 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 1.2pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 3.3% · index 64 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 71 | 1% | 15% | 34% | 49% | 17% | −31 |
| Grade 8 | 82 | 6% | 12% | 21% | 61% | 18% | −28 |
| Grade 11 | 147 | 20% | 34% | 25% | 20% | 54% | +6 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 71 | 1% | 3% | 18% | 77% | 4% | −30 |
| Grade 8 | 82 | 4% | 6% | 15% | 76% | 10% | −22 |
| Grade 11 | 145 | 8% | 7% | 15% | 70% | 15% | −9 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 155 | 1% | 13% | 71% | 15% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 262 | 34.4% | −8 | −4 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 196 | 34.2% | −10 | −5 |
| White | 44 | 38.6% | −14 | −23 |
03Nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter ← | — | 20 | 14.3% | 34.8% | 0.4% |
| Cobalt Institute of Math and Science | 2.6 mi | 69 | 32.7% | 61.9% | 1.9% |
| Silverado High | 2.5 mi | 45 | 10.4% | 31.3% | 3.5% |
| California average | — | 54 | 19.8% | 43.2% | 3.3% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Graduation Rate
39.1%
AP Exam Prepared
3.0%
A-G Completion
37.8%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
35.6%
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 16 | 45 | #60 | 5.3% | 24.3% | 12.3% | 0.6% |
| 2022 | 13 | 23 | #82 | 4.2% | 18.5% | 62.5% | 0.6% |
| 2023 | 14 | 31 | #74 | 4.3% | 21.3% | 49.3% | 1.0% |
| 2024 | 15 | 40 | #67 | 5.3% | 24.8% | 44.3% | 0.5% |
| 2025 | 20 | 49 | #57 | 14.3% | 34.8% | 43.1% | 0.4% |
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
- — This school's rank and percentile are computed against California alternative high schools, not California's comprehensive campuses — see the Enrollment Axiom at /methodology#peer-class.
05UC admissions, universitywide2013–2022 · summed across CEEB codes at query time
ShowHide table 05 — UC admissions, universitywide
| Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled | GPA (applied) | GPA (admitted) | GPA (enrolled) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.38 | — | — |
| 2021 | 7 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.68 | — | — |
| 2020 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 | 3.43 | — | — |
| 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 | 3.52 | — | — |
| 2017 | 5 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.59 | — | — |
| 2016 | 7 | ‹3 | ‹3 | 3.34 | — | — |
| 2015 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 3.52 | 3.93 | — |
| 2014 | 7 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.64 | — | — |
| 2013 | 8 | 4 | ‹3 | 3.73 | — | — |
‹n = UC masks counts below n · a missing year means zero or masked — never assume zero · GPA cells blank for years with more than one contributing CEEB code (a summed GPA would be fabricated math) · GPAs live here and nowhere else on this page · Applied/Admitted/Enrolled reflect who applied, not what the school taught — no admit rate is computed or implied by this table. Series shown from 2011; full record to 1994 at the UC Infocenter.
06UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file
ShowHide table 06 — UC admissions by campus
| Campus | Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | 2022 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2021 | 6 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2021 | 5 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2022 | 6 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2021 | 7 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2020 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2017 | 5 | 3 | ‹3 |
Σ campuses ≠ universitywide — students apply to several campuses; the Universitywide row (muted) is its own independent count, never a sum of the rows above it.
07AP course catalog2025 - 2026
ShowHide table 07 — AP course catalog
| Subject | Taught by |
|---|---|
| African American Studies | this school |
| Computer Science A | this school |
| Computer Science Principles | this school |
| English Language and Composition | this school |
| English Literature and Composition | this school |
| U.S. Government and Politics | this school |
| Biology | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| Calculus AB | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| Chemistry | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| Computer Science Principles | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| English Literature and Composition | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| Spanish Language and Culture | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
| United States History | online provider (EdOptions Academy) |
Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.
08Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshotstructural, dated — newest published; biennial
ShowHide table 08 — Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshot
| Measure | This school |
|---|---|
| AP offered | offered |
| AP course count | 7 |
| AP enrollment | 17 |
| IB participation | not offered |
| Dual enrollment | not offered |
| Algebra I in grade 8 | offered · 1 enrolled |
| Calculus sections | 5 |
| Physics sections | 4 |
| Chemistry sections | 1 |
| Total enrollment (CRDC) | 845 |
Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.
09College destinationsclass of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate
ShowHide table 09 — College destinations
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 0 | 0.0% |
| California State University | 1 | 0.8% |
| California community college | 38 | 32.2% |
| In-state private | 1 | 0.8% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 0 | 0.0% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 2 | 1.7% |
| Not enrolled | 76 | 64.4% |
118 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 36% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2022 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
10California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 10 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +10 | 58 | Accelerated | −8 | 58 | Moderate |
| English Only | +8 | 49 | not categorised | −17 | 49 | not categorised |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +13 | 49 | Accelerated | −4 | 49 | Average |
| Hispanic or Latino | +12 | 36 | Accelerated | −1 | 36 | Average |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/options-for-youth-victor-valley-charter-0670"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Options for Youth-Victor Valley Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=1,647 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · UC Infocenter (annual refresh, summer) — ‹5/‹3 = masked, never summed across campuses · AP Course Ledger 2025 - 2026 (November refresh; authorization not enrollment) · CRDC 2020-21 (biennial; next expected 2021-22) · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction