North Cow Creek Elementary: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.
North Cow Creek pairs 50% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 58 | 22% | 50% | +23.2 | 5.8% | 1.2% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
North Cow Creek Elementary scores 58 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 79th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “50% proficient” and call it done. North Cow Creek deserves a closer read. The school sits in Palo Cedro, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
North Cow Creek's low-income kids hit 66.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 65th to the 79th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 50% of students meet the standard today, above the 42% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 34% | 58% | 35% | 35% | 26% |
| Grade 4 | 37% | 50% | 44% | 46% | 48% |
| Grade 5 | 56% | 77% | 46% | 68% | 79% |
| Grade 6 | 77% | 54% | 52% | 55% | 58% |
| Grade 7 | 81% | 46% | 60% | 69% | 71% |
| Grade 8 | 61% | 74% | 58% | 72% | 68% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 31% | 58% | 58% | 55% | 52% |
| Grade 4 | 48% | 42% | 52% | 46% | 48% |
| Grade 5 | 44% | 60% | 36% | 44% | 45% |
| Grade 6 | 70% | 42% | 34% | 32% | 33% |
| Grade 7 | 50% | 57% | 53% | 50% | 34% |
| Grade 8 | 43% | 58% | 42% | 50% | 44% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 26.6pp across grades; the floor rises 52.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At North Cow Creek Elementary in Palo Cedro, 66.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 66.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. North Cow Creek Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.3% Math proficient); White students (65.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 9.5 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 15 students tested.
6 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$506 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 46% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is North Cow Creek Elementary a good elementary school?
What are North Cow Creek Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does North Cow Creek Elementary rank in California?
Is North Cow Creek Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at North Cow Creek Elementary?
How does North Cow Creek Elementary compare to other schools in Palo Cedro?
How does North Cow Creek Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 27 | 4% | 22% | 41% | 33% | 26% | −17 |
| Grade 4 | 25 | 24% | 24% | 28% | 24% | 48% | +3 |
| Grade 5 | 33 | 30% | 48% | 12% | 9% | 79% | +31 |
| Grade 6 | 24 | 17% | 42% | 21% | 21% | 58% | +12 |
| Grade 7 | 34 | 24% | 47% | 21% | 9% | 71% | +23 |
| Grade 8 | 34 | 24% | 44% | 24% | 9% | 68% | +22 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 27 | 11% | 41% | 26% | 22% | 52% | +6 |
| Grade 4 | 25 | 24% | 24% | 36% | 16% | 48% | +6 |
| Grade 5 | 33 | 36% | 9% | 27% | 27% | 45% | +10 |
| Grade 6 | 24 | 21% | 13% | 54% | 13% | 33% | −2 |
| Grade 7 | 35 | 20% | 14% | 49% | 17% | 34% | +0 |
| Grade 8 | 34 | 26% | 18% | 32% | 24% | 44% | +12 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 67 | 16% | 30% | 46% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 15 | 66.7% | +0 | +28 |
| White | 135 | 65.2% | +0 | +3 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Cow Creek Elementary ← | — | 58 | 21.6% | 49.7% | +23.2 | 1.2% |
| Chrysalis Charter | 2.1 mi | 34 | 27.2% | 45.0% | −40.4 | 1.9% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 49 | 65 | #1918 | 14.7% | 41.8% | 4.3% | 3.5% | +17.3pp |
| 2022 | 55 | 82 | #1029 | 25.0% | 57.6% | 11.2% | 2.2% | +10.0pp |
| 2023 | 44 | 61 | #2236 | 21.1% | 45.1% | 8.8% | 3.0% | -5.1pp |
| 2024 | 48 | 64 | #2039 | 24.7% | 49.2% | 5.8% | 1.8% | +10.8pp |
| 2025 | 58 | 79 | #1197 | 21.6% | 49.7% | 5.8% | 1.2% | +23.2pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.9% | 0.9% | -3.0pp |
| Male | 4.2% | 5.7% | +1.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 9.1% | 5.0% | -4.1pp |
| Two or More Races | 7.4% | 6.9% | -0.5pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 11.8% | 9.7% | -2.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 5.2% | 6.3% | +1.1pp |
| All Students | 4.1% | 3.7% | -0.4pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction