ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Norman L. Sullivan Middle · Bonsall

Norman L. Sullivan Middle: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.

Norman L. Sullivan sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.

7350 West Lilac Road, 92003 (opens in new tab)·Bonsall Unified·Bonsall·Grades 6-8·529 students·55% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 631-5209·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4643
% Exceeded17%17%
% Met+43%39%
Growth+6.6+1.5
Absence1.8%18.5%
Suspension3.4%3.7%
Scope Score
46
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #870 statewide

Norman L. Sullivan Middle scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “43% proficient” and call it done. Norman L. Sullivan deserves a closer read. The school sits in Bonsall, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 1.8% chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 85th to the 61st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 43% meet the standard today, versus 61% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 661%40%44%45%41%
Grade 770%57%58%50%63%
Grade 868%61%57%48%52%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 652%35%36%30%30%
Grade 757%30%36%45%42%
Grade 858%36%28%24%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

17%
24%
59%
Grade 6 · 41% proficient
23%
40%
37%
Grade 7 · 63% proficient
16%
36%
48%
Grade 8 · 52% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 10.9pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
17.1%
State 16.8%
0.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+6.6pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
43.4%
State 39.3%
4.1pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
1.8%
State 18.5%
16.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.4%
State 3.7%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
37.1%
State 18.0%
19.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Norman L. Sullivan Middle in Bonsall, 43.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Norman L. Sullivan Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.1% Math proficient); White students (63.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 271 students tested.

All students at this school: 44% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 44%, district —, state 39%44%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 36%, district 35%, state 32%36% · −9 vs school
MaleMale: this school 44%, district 47%, state 42%44% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 45%, district 46%, state 44%45% · +0 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 54%, district 59%, state 56%54% · +10 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 33%, state 32%34% · −10 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 18%, state 15%12% · −33 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 52%, district 58%, state 46%52% · +8 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 54%, district 57%, state 56%54% · +10 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 19%, district 17%, state 22%19% · −26 vs school

7 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +14.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 1.8%, district 15.5%, state 18.5%1.8% · −16.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.4%, district —, state 3.7%3.4% · −0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–60.6%
Grades 7–81.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 22:123:1
Teaching staff26 teachers
Avg. experience12.6 years
Fully credentialed92%
First-year teachers4%

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,056, CA average $14,815$16,056 · spent at this school
Federal share$464 per student

$464 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,214 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support10%
Student services12%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,907 per pupil
2019$11,019 per pupil
2018$11,208 per pupil
2017$9,189 per pupil
2016$9,145 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White41.4%
District 38.7% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic39.5%
District 39.6% · CA 56.1%
Other15.7%
District 18.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.9%
District 1.7% · CA 10.2%
Black1.5%
District 1.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 54.6% (9pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$113K · CA $85K
Median home value$927K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+44% · CA 35%
ZIP population5,061
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 48% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Norman L. Sullivan Middle a good middle school?

Norman L. Sullivan Middle has a Scope Score of 46 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #870 statewide. 17.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Norman L. Sullivan Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.4% of students at Norman L. Sullivan Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 17.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 17.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,013 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Norman L. Sullivan Middle rank in California?

Norman L. Sullivan Middle ranks #870 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Norman L. Sullivan Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Norman L. Sullivan Middle increases by 6.6 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Norman L. Sullivan Middle?

1.8% of students at Norman L. Sullivan Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Norman L. Sullivan Middle compare to other schools in Bonsall?

Norman L. Sullivan Middle scores 46/100 (61st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 529 students. Use the schools in Bonsall page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Norman L. Sullivan Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Norman L. Sullivan Middle in Bonsall, 43.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Norman L. Sullivan Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.1% Math proficient); White students (63.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 271 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
17.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 50th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+6.6pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 46th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
43.4%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 53th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
1.8%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 73th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.4%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
37.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 72th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 613717%24%31%28%41%−6
Grade 720023%40%19%19%63%+15
Grade 817016%36%25%23%52%+6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 613914%16%32%37%30%−5
Grade 719814%28%26%32%42%+8
Grade 816919%14%22%45%33%+0
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1116922%25%48%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged27143.9%+2+6
White20863.9%−0+2
Hispanic/Latino20442.2%+2+3
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Norman L. Sullivan Middle ←4617.1%43.4%+6.63.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195885#29727.8%60.9%3.5%3.8%+5.9pp
20224976#52117.3%43.3%15.0%7.5%+11.2pp
20234866#74116.8%43.1%6.2%4.3%+2.4pp
20244363#82315.8%40.4%2.6%1.6%-1.6pp
20254661#87017.1%43.4%1.8%3.4%+6.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female3.1%1.5%-1.6pp
Male3.7%1.1%-2.6pp
Asian0.0%
Filipino0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino1.3%0.9%-0.4pp
American Indian/Alaska Native23.7%15.4%-8.3pp
Two or More Races2.9%0.0%-2.9pp
Students with Disabilities11.1%5.7%-5.4pp
English Learners0.0%2.3%+2.3pp
Homeless7.0%0.0%-7.0pp
Military-Connected0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.1%1.3%-3.8pp
All Students3.4%1.3%-2.1pp
White0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction