Nava College Preparatory Academy: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Nava College Preparatory Academy posts 35% meeting the standard and 13.7% exceeding it, against 36% and 15.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 49 | 14% | 35% | 93.9% | 56.4% | 24.6% | 0.9% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Nava College Preparatory Academy scores 49 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Nava College Preparatory Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Nava College Preparatory Academy's low-income kids hit 54.2% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 52nd to the 61st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 high schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 35% of students meet the standard today, above the 26% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 38% | 38% | 43% | 46% | 54% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 15% | 9% | 14% | 18% | 16% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 35 are proficient by 11th grade → 94 graduate → 56 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
Nava College Preparatory Academy's most underrated number
54.2% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Nava College Preparatory Academy in Los Angeles, 54.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Nava College Preparatory Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (16.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (56.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 131 students tested.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,421 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 598 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 17% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Nava College Preparatory Academy a good high school?
What are Nava College Preparatory Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does Nava College Preparatory Academy rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Nava College Preparatory Academy?
How does Nava College Preparatory Academy compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Nava College Preparatory Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 62
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 131 | 21% | 34% | 19% | 27% | 54% | +7 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 131 | 7% | 9% | 24% | 60% | 16% | −7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 144 | 0% | 17% | 65% | 18% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 131 | 54.2% | +13 | +16 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 122 | 56.6% | +16 | +18 |
| Students with Disabilities | 25 | 16.0% | −0 | −1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nava College Preparatory Academy ← | — | 49 | 13.7% | 35.1% | — | 0.9% |
| Orthopaedic Hospital | 1.7 mi | 65 | 24.1% | 54.6% | — | 0.4% |
| Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High | 2.2 mi | 61 | 26.6% | 61.9% | — | 2.1% |
| Early College Academy-LA Trade Tech College | 2 mi | 59 | 26.8% | 50.0% | — | 0.7% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 48 | 52 | #979 | 6.8% | 26.2% | 21.9% | 0.9% | — |
| 2022 | 44 | 52 | #1017 | 4.8% | 23.5% | 38.4% | 1.0% | — |
| 2023 | 46 | 58 | #914 | 7.7% | 28.6% | 26.0% | 1.1% | — |
| 2024 | 49 | 64 | #773 | 13.1% | 32.3% | 28.2% | 1.0% | — |
| 2025 | 49 | 61 | #847 | 13.7% | 35.1% | 24.6% | 0.9% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 21.5% | 24.5% | +3.0pp |
| Male | 21.1% | 23.3% | +2.2pp |
| Black/African American | 38.9% | 40.9% | +2.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 20.5% | 22.7% | +2.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 35.2% | 25.7% | -9.5pp |
| English Learners | 27.1% | 31.0% | +3.9pp |
| Homeless | 52.6% | 41.5% | -11.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 20.7% | 24.0% | +3.3pp |
| All Students | 21.3% | 23.8% | +2.5pp |
| Military-Connected | — | 27.3% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction