ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Charter elementary school

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter

Los Angeles, CA · Grades TK-6 · 323 students · Los Angeles Unified

The score trails the state median. The trajectory doesn't.

45% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 23% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

On the Rise

What this means for your family

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

How archetypes are assigned →

Math

23%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

English

45%

Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

323

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

27%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 59%2022: 28%2023: 26%2024: 25%2025: 23%2019: 59%2022: 45%2023: 32%2024: 40%2025: 45%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 59%2022: 28%2023: 26%2024: 25%2025: 23%2019: 59%2022: 45%2023: 32%2024: 40%2025: 45%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201959%59%
202228%45%
202326%32%
202425%40%
202523%45%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Slipped from the 62nd to the 36th percentile since 2019.

Most rating sites would stop at “31% proficient” and call it done. Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter deserves a closer read. Nearly all of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 25.8% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.

As a charter, Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

192 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 47 tracked

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter scores 31 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 36th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 31% meet the standard today, versus 52% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 62nd percentile · Scope Score 43 of 1002022 · 44th percentile · Scope Score 29 of 1002023 · 43rd percentile · Scope Score 30 of 1002024 · 38th percentile · Scope Score 32 of 1002025 · 36th percentile · Scope Score 31 of 100
ELAYellow(Increased)MathOrange(Declined)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 368%49%34%40%53%
Grade 432%17%39%29%27%
Grade 550%40%29%39%36%
Grade 642%43%55%50%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 366%17%17%20%26%
Grade 443%24%39%17%27%
Grade 552%40%34%30%19%
Grade 640%41%50%53%39%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

One in four of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.

ELA43% met or exceeded
Exceeded 16%Met 27%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 31%
Math27% met or exceeded
Exceeded 9%Met 18%Nearly Met 33%Not Met 40%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)AbsenceSuspension
This school3111%31%Above avg · p6227.2%0.1%
CA average · Elementary School3921%43%Average · p5017.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope3139
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+31%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avg · p62Average · p50
Absence27.2%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

Our growth read and California's own model disagree here — the 62nd percentile against the state's 83rd.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 62nd percentile of California elementary schools; the state's puts it around the 83rd in reading and math together — a better read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
9%
exceeded standard · 34% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
10%
exceeded standard · 36% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 62nd percentile among California elementary schools.62nd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 73rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.73rd pctile · +8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +21 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 93rd percentile of 7,518 reported schools.93rd pctile · +21 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.

At Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter in Los Angeles, 43.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (45.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 189 students tested.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 43%35%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 36%, district 36%, state 32%36% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 37%, district 36%, state 32%37% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 35%, district 41%, state 42%35% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 34%, district 42%, state 44%34% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 18%, district 9%, state 11%18% · −16 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 17.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students130 studentsLow-income students, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 130 students.+8 pts · +8 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students109 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 109 students.+8 pts · +7 vs typical
English Learner77 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: +1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 77 students.+1 pts · +3 vs typical
English Only44 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +16 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 44 students.+16 pts · +13 vs typical
Recently reclassified40 studentsRecently reclassified, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against +8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 40 students.+8 pts · 0 vs typical
Math
Low-income students130 studentsLow-income students, math: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 130 students.+21 pts · +22 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students109 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 109 students.+21 pts · +22 vs typical
English Learner77 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +19 scale-score points versus expectation, against +2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 77 students.+19 pts · +17 vs typical
English Only44 studentsEnglish Only, math: +22 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 44 students.+22 pts · +21 vs typical
Recently reclassified40 studentsRecently reclassified, math: +16 scale-score points versus expectation, against +6 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 40 students.+16 pts · +10 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 22 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher22 · district 20
Teaching staff15 teachers
Avg. experience6.6 years
Fully credentialed89%
First-year teachers13%
PrincipalAustin Saddlemire
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.

27.2% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 17.9% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — worth asking about on a tour.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 27.2%, district 22.8%, state 17.9%27.2% · +9.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

Its district spends $18,180 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,180, CA average $14,491$18,180 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 52%Instruction support 16%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Nearly all of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino87.0% · district 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White0.6% · district 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black4.3% · district 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other8.1% · district 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch98.5% · CA 64%
Median income$56K · CA $85K
Median home value$577K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+7% · CA 35%
ZIP population70,065
Median age31 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Aspire Juanita Tate Academy CharterCharterDeveloping11%31%School being viewed
Sixty-First Street ElementaryPublicStrong19%38%0.5 mi
West Vernon Avenue ElementaryPublicStrong19%42%1.3 mi
Ascot Avenue ElementaryPublicSolid21%43%1.9 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in Los Angeles →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter a good elementary school?
Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter has a Scope Score of 31 out of 100, placing it in the 36th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,655 statewide. 10.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 31.3% of students at Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.6% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 311 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter rank in California?
Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter ranks #3,655 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 36th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks above avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 62nd percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter?
27.2% of students at Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter scores 31/100 (36th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 323 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter in Los Angeles, 43.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (45.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 189 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

The 5 things our score weighs

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 77 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard10.6%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded31.3%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism27.2%17.9%5%
Suspension rate0.1%1.6%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter: reading the evidence

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter still trails on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the school's own returning cohort across grades.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter is ranked #3,655 statewide · #431 of 579 in Los Angeles Unified.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard10.6%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded31.3%42.7%23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism27.2%17.9%5%
Suspension rate0.1%1.6%5%
Exceeded standard
↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 40 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 41 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
↑ vs CA average · 62nd pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.9% · index 35 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 3.5pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 62 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35524%29%25%22%53%+10
Grade 44813%15%29%44%27%−18
Grade 55010%26%24%40%36%−12
Grade 63915%41%26%18%56%+10
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3583%22%24%50%26%−20
Grade 4488%19%46%27%27%−14
Grade 5526%13%33%48%19%−16
Grade 64122%17%32%29%39%+5

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide522%13%69%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18943.4%+2+5
Hispanic/Latino16245.7%+5+7
English Learners6225.8%+19+15
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter ←—3110.6%31.3%−11.7pp+77 pts0.1%
Sixty-First Street Elementary0.5 mi5018.8%38.5%−3.7pp—0.4%
West Vernon Avenue Elementary1.3 mi5019.1%41.8%+5.9pp—0.1%
Ascot Avenue Elementary1.9 mi4720.7%42.7%+10.1pp—0.1%
California average—3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20194362#207621.3%51.8%7.4%0.6%-16.2pp
20222944#318611.3%31.2%33.8%0.1%+7.0pp
20233043#326112.8%32.1%33.9%0.1%+6.4pp
20243238#354810.4%29.3%23.7%0.1%+4.7pp
20253136#365510.6%31.3%27.2%0.1%-11.7pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+8130Accelerated+21130Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+8130Accelerated+21130Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino+8109Accelerated+21109Exceptional
English Learner+177Average+1977Accelerated
English Only+1644not categorised+2244not categorised
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+840not categorised+1640not categorised
English Learners Only−637not categorised+2037not categorised
Students with Disabilities+822Accelerated+1222Accelerated

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/aspire-juanita-tate-academy-charter-4792"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.