Math
52%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Public middle school
Murrieta Canyon Academy
Scores climb 6.2 points from grade 6 to grade 8. But one in three miss a month of school or more.
74% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 52% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Solid Base
What this means for your family
Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(951) 696-1661
DistrictMurrieta Valley Unified
PrincipalMatthew Bean
GradesK-12
Enrollment296 students
English
74%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
296Total enrollment
Chronic absence
35%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | — |
| 2022 | 24% | 58% |
| 2023 | 31% | 51% |
| 2024 | 24% | 60% |
| 2025 | 52% | 74% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
41%ProficientStandard Met
11%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
25%MinimalStandard Not Met
23%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
33%ProficientStandard Met
42%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
21%MinimalStandard Not Met
5%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2022 to 2025
Climbed from the 61st to the 89th percentile since 2022 — past roughly 600 middle schools.
Most rating sites would stop at “66% proficient” and call it done. Murrieta Canyon Academy deserves a closer read. Three in five of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Murrieta Canyon Academy's low-income kids hit 55.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
133 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · no cohort tracked
Murrieta Canyon Academy scores 62 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Percentile among 2,177 middle schools statewide
ELAYellow(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | — | 51% | 63% | 73% | — |
| Grade 4 | — | 50% | 67% | — | — |
| Grade 5 | — | 63% | 39% | 52% | — |
| Grade 6 | — | 54% | 50% | 47% | 75% |
| Grade 7 | — | 68% | 69% | 58% | 86% |
| Grade 8 | — | 62% | 52% | 71% | 74% |
| Grade 11 | 44% | 33% | 33% | 32% | 34% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | — | 44% | 67% | 36% | — |
| Grade 4 | — | 42% | 42% | — | — |
| Grade 5 | — | 30% | 29% | 45% | — |
| Grade 6 | — | 18% | 36% | 24% | 44% |
| Grade 7 | — | 30% | 26% | 31% | 61% |
| Grade 8 | — | 29% | 26% | 24% | 57% |
| Grade 11 | 11% | 8% | 7% | 10% | 4% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Two-thirds of students here meet the standard. One in three clear it by a lot.
ELA59% met or exceeded
Exceeded 27%Met 32%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 14%
Math34% met or exceeded
Exceeded 23%Met 10%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 40%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California middle schools · average17% exceeded · 40% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 62 | 36% | 66% | — | 34.5% | 5.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 39 | 17% | 40% | — | 18.1% | 3.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope6239
% Exceeded36%17%
% Met+66%40%
Growth——
Absence34.5%18.1%
Suspension5.1%3.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model places it near the 98th percentile of middle schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well above the middle of California middle schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +42 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 99th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.99th pctile · +42 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +26 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 97th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.97th pctile · +26 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.
55.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. This comparison does not tell us what caused the difference.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 46% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 46%, district —, state 40%46%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 43%, district 48%, state 32%43% · −3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 37%, district 48%, state 32%37% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 25%, district 55%, state 42%25% · −20 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 52%, district 56%, state 44%52% · +7 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 24%, district 62%, state 56%24% · −22 vs school
10 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 4.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.8pp.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
English Only42 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +42 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 42 students.+42 pts · +42 vs typical
Low-income students31 studentsLow-income students, reading: +37 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 31 students.+37 pts · +40 vs typical
Math
English Only42 studentsEnglish Only, math: +20 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 42 students.+20 pts · +23 vs typical
Low-income students31 studentsLow-income students, math: +23 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 31 students.+23 pts · +28 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 3 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 12 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher12 · district 24
Teaching staff33 teachers
Avg. experience14.8 years
Fully credentialed68%
PrincipalMatthew Bean
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$61,327 – $146,910
Principal salary$171,292 – $193,801
Superintendent salary$346,925
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here miss more school, and get suspended more, than the state average.
Ask on a visit
Ask how the school tracks and follows up on attendance. High absence often reflects community stress, not classroom quality — a visit will tell you which.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 34.5%, district 18.9%, state 18.1%34.5% · +16.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.1%, district —, state 3.6%5.1% · +1.5pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–632.6%
Grades 7–830.8%
Grades 9–1242.6%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $24,849 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,849, CA average $14,491$24,849 · spent at this school
District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,831 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 64%Instruction support 9%Student services 10%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,094 per pupil
2019$11,339 per pupil
2018$11,338 per pupil
2017$10,906 per pupil
2016$10,253 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Three in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 296 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).
On the state's science test (CAST), 41% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino49.7% · district 43.3% · CA 56.1%
White30.7% · district 32.8% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.0% · district 4.1% · CA 10.2%
Black6.1% · district 5.2% · CA 4.8%
Other11.5% · district 14.7% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch62.5% · CA 64%
Median income$125K · CA $85K
Median home value$646K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+34% · CA 35%
ZIP population80,379
Median age36 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murrieta Canyon Academy | Public | Strong | 36% | 66% | School being viewed | |
| Thompson Middle | Public | Solid | 21% | 52% | 0.2 mi | |
| Shivela Middle | Public | Solid | 20% | 48% | 2.2 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
16 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Murrieta Valley Unified.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Murrieta Canyon Academy a good middle school?
Murrieta Canyon Academy has a Scope Score of 62 out of 100, placing it in the 89th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #229 statewide. 36.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 19.0 percentage points above the California average of 17.2%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Murrieta Canyon Academy's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 66.2% of students at Murrieta Canyon Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 36.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 36.2% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 132 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Murrieta Canyon Academy rank in California?
Murrieta Canyon Academy ranks #229 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 89th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Murrieta Canyon Academy?
34.5% of students at Murrieta Canyon Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 5.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Murrieta Canyon Academy compare to other schools in Murrieta?
Murrieta Canyon Academy scores 62/100 (89th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 296 students. Use the schools in Murrieta page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Murrieta Canyon Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Murrieta Canyon Academy in Murrieta, 55.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 56.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Murrieta Canyon Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 0.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.7 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 80 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
Growth carries this score — its returning cohort's growth from grade 6 to grade 8. The test levels clear the state's too.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 36.2% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 66.2% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 34.5% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 5.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 27.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G6→G8, different students) | +6.2pp | +1.5pp | — |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Murrieta Canyon Academy: reading the evidence
Murrieta Canyon Academy's strongest signal is real. Attendance is the number to ask about — and both belong on the same page.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Murrieta Canyon Academy is ranked #229 statewide · #1 of 5 in Murrieta Valley Unified.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 36.2% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 66.2% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 34.5% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 5.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 27.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G6→G8, different students) | +6.2pp | +1.5pp | not scored |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 17.2% · index 71 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 40.0% · index 71 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 18.1% · index 28 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 3.5pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↓ vs CA 3.6% · index 44 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 2.1pp higher vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 57 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Grade gap (G6→G8, different students)
- ↑ vs CA +1.5pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 16 | 19% | 56% | 19% | 6% | 75% | +29 |
| Grade 7 | 22 | 41% | 45% | 9% | 5% | 86% | +39 |
| Grade 8 | 27 | 41% | 33% | 22% | 4% | 74% | +28 |
| Grade 11 | 53 | 11% | 23% | 43% | 23% | 34% | −15 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 16 | 31% | 13% | 38% | 19% | 44% | +9 |
| Grade 7 | 23 | 39% | 22% | 26% | 13% | 61% | +27 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 46% | 11% | 18% | 25% | 57% | +25 |
| Grade 11 | 52 | 0% | 4% | 25% | 71% | 4% | −20 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 94 | 14% | 28% | 57% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 80 | 55.5% | −0 | +17 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 45 | 46.1% | −11 | +7 |
| White | 17 | 47.1% | −22 | −15 |
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murrieta Canyon Academy ← | — | 62 | 36.2% | 66.2% | +6.2pp | — | 5.1% |
| Thompson Middle | 0.2 mi | 46 | 21.5% | 52.4% | +0.8pp | — | 3.2% |
| Shivela Middle | 2.2 mi | 41 | 19.8% | 47.9% | −1.2pp | — | 5.5% |
| California average | — | 39 | 17.2% | 40.0% | +1.5pp | — | 3.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 38 | 61 | #821 | 14.4% | 43.5% | 38.0% | 1.4% | +9.6pp |
| 2023 | 37 | 63 | #787 | 17.5% | 42.9% | 43.0% | 4.1% | -4.3pp |
| 2024 | 38 | 58 | #904 | 16.1% | 42.5% | 38.0% | 3.0% | +12.2pp |
| 2025 | 62 | 89 | #229 | 36.2% | 66.2% | 34.5% | 5.1% | +6.2pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
What we can't show
- — Scored here as a middle school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 59.6% | 33.3% | -26.3pp |
| Male | 47.4% | 42.9% | -4.5pp |
| Asian | 44.4% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 29.2% | 56.5% | +27.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 46.3% | 38.7% | -7.6pp |
| Two or More Races | 66.7% | 36.0% | -30.7pp |
| White | 59.6% | 35.7% | -23.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 62.9% | 36.5% | -26.4pp |
| English Learners | 41.7% | 28.6% | -13.1pp |
| Foster Youth | 27.3% | — | — |
| Homeless | 43.8% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 46.2% | 41.2% | -5.0pp |
| All Students | 53.7% | 38.1% | -15.6pp |
| Filipino | — | 18.2% | — |
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +42 | 49 | Exceptional | +26 | 49 | Exceptional |
| English Only | +42 | 42 | not categorised | +20 | 42 | not categorised |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +37 | 31 | Exceptional | +23 | 31 | Exceptional |
| Hispanic or Latino | +48 | 23 | Exceptional | +41 | 23 | Exceptional |
| White | +17 | 12 | Accelerated | −21 | 12 | Minimal |
| Students with Disabilities | +28 | 11 | Exceptional | −5 | 11 | Average |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/murrieta-canyon-academy-2079"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Murrieta Canyon Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction