ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Public elementary school

Mt. Pleasant Elementary

San Jose, CA · Grades TK-5 · 172 students (NCES Common Core of Data school directory; reporting year unverified) · Mount Pleasant Elementary

17thStatewide percentile · Needs Support

among 5,721 California elementary schools · 2025 test results

At Mt. Pleasant Elementary, the average Standard Met or Exceeded rate is 17.1% across reported grade–subject rows (2025 CAASPP).

Scope Score 23 of 100 — built from exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. It places the school; it is not a grade. · How this is calculated

Math

13%California 37%

English

26%California 49%
Sources, grades and tested counts for Math and English

Math: Grades 3 & 5 · 2025 · Met or Exceeded · 46 school test records. California 37% · 2,946,081 test records · all tested grades 3–8 and 11; a different grade population from this school figure.

English: Grades 3 & 5 · 2025 · Met or Exceeded · 46 school test records. California 49% · 2,931,356 test records · all tested grades 3–8 and 11; a different grade population from this school figure.

Source and calculation for this school’s result

Source: SchoolScope calculation from CDE CAASPP, 2024–25 academic year (test year 2025); available ELA and math rates for grades 3–5, averaged equally across grade–subject rows.

Mt. Pleasant Elementary · 2024-25 grades 3–5 ELA and math: 6 equally weighted Met or Exceeded rates for All Students tested with scores average 17.1%.

CDE / ETS CAASPP · 2024-25 · Mt. Pleasant Elementary, grades 3–5 ELA and math, All Students tested with scores: 6 Met or Exceeded grade–subject rate cells, equally weighted; not a distinct-student share.

Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

Across the reported grades and subjects, the average Met + Exceeded rate is 17.1% and the average Exceeded rate is 6.0%.

Ask on a visit

What instruction helps students move beyond meeting the standard here, given the reported 17.1% Met + Exceeded and 6.0% Exceeded averages?

ELA20% met or exceeded
Exceeded 8%Met 13%Nearly Met 13%Not Met 68%
California ◇ 48.81% met or exceeded · all tested grades 3–8 and 11 · CDE CAASPP 2025 · 2,931,356 tested with scores
This school · CDE CAASPP 2025 · all tested grades 3, 4, 5 · 80 tested with scores
Math13% met or exceeded
Exceeded 4%Met 9%Nearly Met 31%Not Met 56%
California ◇ 37.30% met or exceeded · all tested grades 3–8 and 11 · CDE CAASPP 2025 · 2,946,081 tested with scores
This school · CDE CAASPP 2025 · all tested grades 3, 4, 5 · 80 tested with scores
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceededSchoolScope calculation from CDE CAASPP 2025 · equal school mean of scored comprehensive elementary school averages across configured grade–subject records · 5,721 schools (Exceeded) · 5,721 schools (Met or Exceeded)
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+GrowthAbsenceSuspension
This school236%17%—18.9%1.2%
CA average · Elementary School3921%43%—17.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope2339
% Exceeded6%21%
% Met+17%43%
Growth—
CA reference midpoint—
Absence18.9%17.9%
Suspension1.2%1.6%

2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Share at Standard Met or Exceeded

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 36%2022: 25%2023: 23%2024: 21%2025: 13%2019: 26%2022: 25%2023: 24%2024: 20%2025: 26%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 36%2022: 25%2023: 23%2024: 21%2025: 13%2019: 26%2022: 25%2023: 24%2024: 20%2025: 26%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201936%26%
202225%25%
202323%24%
202421%20%
202513%26%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Grade comparisons and the full academic source record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Slipped from the 44th to the 17th percentile of California comprehensive elementary schools since 2019.

Mt. Pleasant's reported results deserve a closer read. 79.7% of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

80 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · no cohort tracked

Mt. Pleasant Elementary scores 23 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 17th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

The average Standard Met or Exceeded rate across reported grade–subject rows is 17% in 2025, below 34% in 2019. These years test different student groups.

California elementary school percentile by year
Year detailsYear2019 · 44th percentile · Scope Score 34 of 100California comprehensive elementary schools · 2019 · 5,484 schools2022 · 39th percentile · Scope Score 28 of 100California comprehensive elementary schools · 2022 · 5,704 schools2023 · 22nd percentile · Scope Score 22 of 100California comprehensive elementary schools · 2023 · 5,696 schools2024 · 16th percentile · Scope Score 24 of 100California comprehensive elementary schools · 2024 · 5,711 schools2025 · 17th percentile · Scope Score 23 of 100California comprehensive elementary schools · 2025 · 5,721 schools
ELARed(Declined)· 2025MathOrange(Declined)· 2025
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 316%14%25%21%17%
Grade 439%24%28%17%12%
Grade 537%36%24%20%36%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 333%18%29%31%17%
Grade 439%19%17%9%12%
Grade 539%33%18%13%9%
State growth model · CDE 2025 Dashboard growth

California's 2025 Dashboard growth model: ELA −11 and math −12 scale-score pts vs expected.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California's 2025 Dashboard weighted matched-student growth estimate reports ELA −11 pts vs expected and math −12 pts vs expected for this school. These are scale-score points relative to predictions from students' prior results. We show this separate measure; it is not part of the Scope Score.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; it is not two independent annual observations. It covers grades 4–8 only. SchoolScope shows it separately from the Scope Score: California follows matched students, while our scored cohort measure compares school-grade groups across years.

California's growth model · reported-school field

CDE ELA, 2025 Dashboard: −11 pts vs expected for matched students in grades 4–8. Source detail

CDE math, 2025 Dashboard: −12 pts vs expected for matched students in grades 4–8. Source detail

17th percentile · Needs Support · California comprehensive elementary schools · 2025

Statewide rank: #4,711 of 5,721 · California comprehensive elementary schools · 2025

#3 of 4 in Mount Pleasant Elementary · Statewide percentile: 17th · Ranked comprehensive elementary schools · 2025

What helps students meet or exceed the standard in ELA and math across grades 3–5?

Mt. Pleasant Elementary vs. California · 2024-25 grade 4 ELA Met or Exceeded rates for Hispanic students tested with scores: 12.5% vs. 35.1%.

CDE / ETS CAASPP · 2024-25 · Mt. Pleasant Elementary and California, Hispanic students tested with scores in grade 4 ELA: same-group, grade and subject Met or Exceeded rates; no causal inference.

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide in grades 3–5.

At Mt. Pleasant Elementary in San Jose, 17.2% of socioeconomically disadvantaged students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 23.5% district-wide for those same grades and 35.2% statewide for those same grades. Mt. Pleasant Elementary's rate for socioeconomically disadvantaged students trails its district average by 6.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: socioeconomically disadvantaged students (7.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (15.9% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Among the reported ELA and Math proficiency gaps supplied for this school, the largest is 6.6 percentage points: Hispanic students trail the school-wide rate in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 64 ELA grade test records.

Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA in grades 3–5 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.

Ask on a visit

What support reaches students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged in ELA, given their reported results in grades 3–5 are behind the same group statewide?

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 16% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 16%, district —, state 43%16%
How the all-students rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; school: 160 eligible test records, ELA and math, all school tested grades. state: equal school mean of 5,721 comprehensive elementary composites. The district all-students reference is unavailable here.

Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 12%, district 22%, state 32%12% · −5 vs school
How hispanic/latino rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 138 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

69 known ELA test records

  • school: 138 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
  • district: 1,539 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 3,304,057 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 13%, district 24%, state 32%13% · −4 vs school
How socioeconomically disadvantaged rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 128 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

64 known ELA test records

  • school: 128 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
  • district: 1,504 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 3,798,521 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
MaleMale: this school 17%, district 24%, state 42%17% · +0 vs school
How male rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 96 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

48 known ELA test records

  • school: 96 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
  • district: 1,006 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 3,005,929 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 10%, state 11%2% · −14 vs school
How english learners rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 52 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

34 known ELA test records

  • school: 52 eligible test records across 4 published grade–subject rate records; school ELA grade 3: rate not published; school MATH grade 3: rate not published
  • district: 709 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 945,854 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
FemaleFemale: this school 8%, district 30%, state 44%8% · −8 vs school
How female rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 48 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

32 known ELA test records

  • school: 48 eligible test records across 4 published grade–subject rate records; school ELA grade 5: rate not published; school MATH grade 5: rate not published
  • district: 971 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 2,872,108 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school rate not published, district 2%, state 15%Not published
How students with disabilities rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

14 known ELA test records

1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts

  • school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 3: rate not published; school MATH grade 3: rate not published; school ELA grade 4: rate not published; school MATH grade 4: rate not published; school ELA grade 5: rate not published; school MATH grade 5: rate not published
  • district: 296 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 773,488 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
HomelessHomeless: this school rate not published, district 23%, state 22%Not published
How homeless rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

13 known ELA test records

1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts

  • school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 3: rate not published; school MATH grade 3: rate not published; school ELA grade 4: rate not published; school MATH grade 4: rate not published; school ELA grade 5: rate not published; school MATH grade 5: rate not published
  • district: 259 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 235,862 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
AsianAsian: this school rate not published, district 56%, state 72%Not published
How asian rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

8 known ELA test records

1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts

  • school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 3: rate not published; school MATH grade 3: rate not published; school ELA grade 4: rate not published; school MATH grade 4: rate not published; school ELA grade 5: rate not published; school MATH grade 5: rate not published
  • district: 251 eligible test records across 12 published grade–subject rate records
  • state: 613,603 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school rate not published, district —, state 56%Not published
How two or more races rates were calculated

CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.

ELA tested count not published

2 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts

  • school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 4 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 3: rate not published; school MATH grade 3: rate not published; school ELA grade 4: rate not published; school MATH grade 4: rate not published
  • district: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; district: 2 unavailable tested counts; district ELA grade 3: rate not published; district MATH grade 3: rate not published; district ELA grade 4: rate not published; district MATH grade 4: rate not published; district ELA grade 5: rate not published; district MATH grade 5: rate not published; district ELA grade 6: rate not published; district MATH grade 6: rate not published; district ELA grade 7: rate not published; district MATH grade 7: rate not published; district ELA grade 8: rate not published; district MATH grade 8: rate not published
  • state: 337,620 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by subject
Met or Exceeded by student group and subject · CDE CAASPP 2025
Student group · subjectTestedSchoolDistrictCaliforniaVs district
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged · English6417.2%23.5%35.2%-6.4pp vs district
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged · Math647.8%19.2%30.0%-11.4pp vs district
Hispanic/Latino · English6915.9%23.2%35.9%-7.2pp vs district
Hispanic/Latino · Math697.2%16.4%30.2%-9.1pp vs district
English Learners · English263.8%10.1%12.1%-6.3pp vs district
English Learners · Math260.0%8.7%11.8%-8.7pp vs district
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Among students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged at this school, the grade 5 percentage meeting or exceeding the ELA standard is 6.4 percentage points higher than the grade 3 percentage. CDE CAASPP 2025; separate grade-level student groups, not matched children. The school-level results are from the same year: grade 3 had 19 tested students; grade 5 had 18. District grade-group difference for the same subject and grades: -1.8 percentage points.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

CDE reports ELA and math growth for available student groups in scale-score points versus its model’s prediction. The diamond marks SchoolScope’s median among imported California school records matched by year, subject, group and primary elementary level. It is our comparison, not a CDE benchmark.

ELA
Hispanic or Latino students47 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group ELA primary elementary population: 5,503 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median +1 pts
Hispanic or Latino students, ela: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's +1-point median for matching California elementary school records, 47 students.−15 pts · −16 vs matched median
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged44 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group ELA primary elementary population: 5,624 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median 0 pts
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, ela: −12 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's 0-point median for matching California elementary school records, 44 students.−12 pts · −12 vs matched median
English Learner30 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group ELA primary elementary population: 4,914 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median −2 pts
English Learner, ela: −19 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's −2-point median for matching California elementary school records, 30 students.−19 pts · −17 vs matched median
Math
Hispanic or Latino students47 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group MATH primary elementary population: 5,502 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median −1 pts
Hispanic or Latino students, math: −14 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's −1-point median for matching California elementary school records, 47 students.−14 pts · −13 vs matched median
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged44 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group MATH primary elementary population: 5,624 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median −1 pts
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's −1-point median for matching California elementary school records, 44 students.−13 pts · −12 vs matched median
English Learner30 students
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model 2025estimate WEIGHTEDSchoolScope benchmark — same-group MATH primary elementary population: 4,911 school recordsSchoolScope lower empirical median +2 pts
English Learner, math: −9 scale-score points versus expectation, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for matching California elementary school records, 30 students.−9 pts · −11 vs matched median
this school SchoolScope median, matching California elementary schools| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

3 additional groups have at least one imported CDE growth row below SchoolScope’s 30-student narrative threshold. Their available values and counts are in the data appendix. An unlisted group may have no usable record here for several reasons; its absence does not establish its size or performance. These CDE growth figures are context; SchoolScope does not use them in its Scope Score.

What support reaches Hispanic students in grade 4 ELA?

What it’s like

Attendance & discipline · CDE climate 2024–25

CDE reported 19.1% chronic absenteeism (above SchoolScope's equal-school mean for scored comprehensive California public/charter elementary schools with reported CDE rates) and 1.1% suspension (below its corresponding mean) in 2024–25.

TK/K students were chronically absent at about 2.3 times the rate of grades 4–5 students (32.1% vs 14.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Ask on a visit

How does the school follow up when students begin missing days, given its reported 19.1% chronic-absence rate in 2024–25?

CDE reported rates
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.1%, district 20.7%, state 17.9%. CDE reported 2024–25.19.1% · +1.2pp vs state
CDE reported · 2024–25 · all students · 36 chronically absent · 188 eligible students · District · elementary · equal-school mean across 4 comprehensive scored schools: 20.7% · California · elementary · equal-school mean across 5,721 comprehensive scored schools: 17.9%
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district 0.9%, state 1.6%. CDE reported 2024–25.1.1% · −0.5pp vs state
CDE reported · 2024–25 · all students · 2 students suspended · 190 cumulative enrollment · District · elementary · equal-school mean across 4 comprehensive scored schools: 0.9% · California · elementary · equal-school mean across 5,721 comprehensive scored schools: 1.6%
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide How SchoolScope uses climate in its score
SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs

These scoring inputs may differ from CDE's reported all-students rates. Their comparisons also average model inputs, not raw CDE rates.

Adjusted chronic absence inputSchoolScope adjusted chronic absence input: this school 18.9%, district 21.0%, state 17.9%18.9%
Adjusted suspension inputSchoolScope adjusted suspension input: this school 1.2%, district —, state 1.6%1.2%
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide Chronic absenteeism trend since 2019
Chronic absenteeism, all students · since 2019
ShowHide Attendance by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 1–314.1%11 of 78 eligible students chronically absent
Grades 4–614.0%8 of 57 eligible students chronically absent
TK/K32.1%17 of 53 eligible students chronically absent
Teachers and the staffing source record
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 22 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

School staffing2024–25: about 22 enrolled students per teacher FTE · SchoolScope reporting-district average 21

2024–25: about 22 enrolled students per teacher FTE. CDE school-total enrollment divided by the school's reported teacher full-time equivalents in the NCES CCD 2024–25 final school staff file. SchoolScope rounds the result to a whole student per teacher; the CDE staffing year above dates separate teacher facts. The SchoolScope reporting-district average covers verified schools in our directory under this school's 2024–25 CDE reporting parent; school ratios are weighted by enrollment. The California figure, where shown, also averages available school ratios weighted by enrollment. This schoolwide staffing ratio is not class size.

ShowHide teacher experience, credentials and courses
Teaching staff8 teachers
Avg. experience17.8 years
Proper credential and placement90%

Proper credential and placement: CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22. The publisher rate is 90.00%; 9.0 teaching-position FTE had proper credential and placement out of 10.0 total teaching-position FTE. This denominator is positions, not the teacher count above.

First-year teachers0%
PrincipalGilbert Rodriguez

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family and educator voices

Survey results: unavailable on this profile · Response counts: unknown

Bring these questions on a visit →
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent

CDE ESSA reports $27,724 per student in spending attributed to this school.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Per-pupil spending

This school · attributed spending$27,724 per pupil

CDE ESSA · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 172. Reports may use Census Day enrollment, cumulative enrollment, or annual average daily attendance (ADA); the type is unavailable here. SchoolScope sums four reported school and allocated central expenditure components. These averages do not show an individual child's budget or teaching quality.

Can we visit during a typical school day to see how students receive support?

Getting in

Contact

PrincipalGilbert Rodriguez
GradesTK-524 TK students · 2026 CDE Census Day enrollment
Enrollment172 students
The neighborhood

79.7% of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

CDE Census Day counted 172 students here in 2024–25. This was below the 2024–25 median of 465 across 4,593 distinct schools in SchoolScope's administrative elementary directory category. The selected pool uses active comprehensive public and charter records with last-seen year 2025, verified CDE school totals and grades, and traditional or alternative-choice operations. It is not a statewide sample; category membership does not imply substantial enrollment in every grade or comparable grade distributions or programs.

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

ShowHide school demographics
Hispanic or Latino83.1% · district 77.0% · CA 56.1%
White1.2% · district 2.0% · CA 20.0%
Asian10.5% · district 12.8% · CA 10.1%
Black1.2% · district 1.9% · CA 4.9%
Other4.1% · district 6.2% · CA 9.0%

CDE Census Day · 2024–25 · school 172 students · district 1,516 students · CA 5,806,221 students. CDE Census Day enrollment files. Other includes Filipino, American Indian, Pacific Islander, two or more races, and not reported.

GenderFemale 41.3% (71) · Male 58.7% (101) · Non-binary 0.0% (0)CDE Census Day · 2024–25 · 172 students
Students eligible for free or reduced-price meals79.7% at this school · 62.8% CaliforniaSchool: 137 eligible of 172 enrolled · California: 3,647,037 eligible of 5,806,221 enrolledRates = eligible ÷ enrolled · CDE Census Day · TK/K–12 enrollment · 2024–25 · California total includes district-office records · CDE free/reduced-price meals file
Address rules and the K–12 path

Check your address with the district

School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Mount Pleasant Elementary.

District information →School website →

Schools across the K–12 journey

Schools are grouped by grade stage. Each link's evidence appears on its card. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.

Feeder path, destinations and source limits
Where kids go next

The recorded zoned path continues to August Boeger Middle, a middle school.

Direct boundary-overlap evidence here comes from the 2015–16 NCES SABS collection. None of these links confirms a current address assignment. Check each step with the district.

Ask on a visit

Is August Boeger Middle still the assigned next school for this address, and what should families verify with the district before planning that transition?

School path evidence
  1. Mt. Pleasant Elementaryelementary scaleThis schoolScope 23/100 · 17th percentile · California comprehensive elementary schools · 2025 test resultsNeeds Support
  2. August Boeger Middlemiddle scaleHistorical zoned-area majority link · NCES SABS 2015–16; verify current assignmentScope 29/100 · 33rd percentile · California comprehensive middle schools · 2025 test resultsDeveloping
ShowHide full feeder path and alternatives

K-12 feeder path

Elementary
Mt. Pleasant Elementary
17th percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 2025
23/100
This school
▼
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Each school card names its own evidence. Historical boundary links and nearby distance estimates do not confirm a current address assignment; verify the path with the district.

Compare schools serving the same grade stage.

Open the comparison tool →
Nearby results, school options and enrollment checks

Compare nearby schools and their reported results

2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Comprehensive schools are compared statewide; alternative and continuation schools are compared within their own class.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandStandard ExceededStandard Met or ExceededDistanceSelect
Mt. Pleasant ElementaryPublic
Needs Support17th percentile · statewide
6%17%School being viewed
Voices College-Bound Language Academy at Mt. PleasCharter
Needs Support10th percentile · statewide
3%24%0.4 mi
Rocketship Academy Brilliant MindsCharter
Solid64th percentile · statewide
23%45%0.5 mi
Robert Sanders ElementaryPublic
Needs Support17th percentile · statewide
8%27%0.5 mi
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools serving this grade stage, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in San Jose →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

14 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored

What should I check before applying?

District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Does this school serve our address, and what do we need to enroll?

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Mt. Pleasant Elementary a good elementary school?
Mt. Pleasant Elementary has a Scope Score of 23 out of 100, placing it in the 17th percentile of California comprehensive elementary schools and ranked #4,711 statewide. Across the available ELA and Math grade-subject results for grades 3–5 on the 2025 CAASPP, Mt. Pleasant Elementary's average Standard Exceeded rate is 6.0%. Available ELA and Math grade-subject rates are averaged equally. That is 15.3 percentage points below the 21.4% equal-school average across scored California comprehensive elementary schools at this level. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Mt. Pleasant Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
Across available ELA and Math grade-subject rates combined in CDE CAASPP 2025 (2024–25), Mt. Pleasant Elementary's average Standard Met or Exceeded rate is 17.1%; its average Standard Exceeded rate is 6.0%. Available grade-subject rates are averaged equally. The 11.0 percentage-point difference is the average Standard Met-only share across those same rows. These are averages of result rows, not the share of distinct students at the school. 160 student-subject test results underpin the school's assessment record.
How does Mt. Pleasant Elementary rank in California?
Mt. Pleasant Elementary is in the 17th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Needs Support, 2025). Mt. Pleasant Elementary ranks #4,711 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Mt. Pleasant Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 19.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 36 chronically absent of 188 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 1.1%; 2 unduplicated suspended students of 190 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 18.9%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 1.2%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Mt. Pleasant Elementary compare to other schools in San Jose?
Mt. Pleasant Elementary scores 23/100 (17th percentile) among California comprehensive elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 172 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Mt. Pleasant Elementary?
At Mt. Pleasant Elementary in San Jose, 17.2% of socioeconomically disadvantaged students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 23.5% district-wide for those same grades and 35.2% statewide for those same grades. Mt. Pleasant Elementary's rate for socioeconomically disadvantaged students trails its district average by 6.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: socioeconomically disadvantaged students (7.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (15.9% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Among the reported ELA and Math proficiency gaps supplied for this school, the largest is 6.6 percentage points: Hispanic students trail the school-wide rate in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 64 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Mt. Pleasant Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Mt. Pleasant Elementary is zoned to August Boeger Middle. August Boeger Middle has a Scope Score of 29 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

Methods, source tables and limitations

How the Scope Score is calculated

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

The 6 things our score weighs

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard6.0%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded17.1%42.7%23%
Chronic absenteeism18.9%17.9%5%
Suspension rate1.2%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)1.4%17.8%5%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)+6.1pp-2.9pp—

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

Interpretation and source limits

Mt. Pleasant posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 6.1pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Explore the underlying data →
Data and sources · For the data nerds

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Mt. Pleasant Elementary is ranked #4,711 statewide · #3 of 4 in Mount Pleasant Elementary.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
ShowHide table 01 — Score factors
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard6.0%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded17.1%42.7%23%
Chronic absenteeism18.9%17.9%5%
Suspension rate1.2%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)1.4%17.8%5%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)+6.1pp-2.9ppnot scored
Exceeded standard
↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 35 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 31 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.9% · index 48 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 7.3pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 54 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 1.0pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 17.8% · index 30 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
↑ vs CA -2.9pp

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3240%17%8%75%17%−26
Grade 4346%6%21%68%12%−33
Grade 52218%18%5%59%36%−11

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3240%17%33%50%17%−29
Grade 4343%9%26%62%12%−30
Grade 5229%0%36%55%9%−26

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA3821.1%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA2317.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA4520.0%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math3930.8%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math238.7%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math4513.3%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA2425.0%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA4727.7%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA3823.7%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math2429.2%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math4717.0%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math3818.4%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA12713.7%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA12724.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA12735.9%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math12717.6%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math12718.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math12733.3%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA15015.8%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA15038.6%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA15036.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math15332.8%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math15338.6%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math15339.2%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide220%27%55%18%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6417.2%−6−18
Hispanic/Latino6915.9%−7−20
English Learners263.8%−6−8
03Nearest elementary schoolsnearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
ShowHide table 03 — Nearest elementary schools
SchoolDistScope · percentile · bandEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Mt. Pleasant Elementary ←—2317th percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 20256.0%17.1%+6.1pp—1.2%
Voices College-Bound Language Academy at Mt. Pleas0.4 mi2010th percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 20253.2%23.8%−5.2pp—4.8%
Rocketship Academy Brilliant Minds0.5 mi4264th percentile · Solid · statewide · 202522.7%45.0%−13.0pp—0.1%
Robert Sanders Elementary0.5 mi2317th percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 20257.7%27.3%−10.0pp—1.2%
California average—39School average · no percentile21.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders10.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records
Teacher salary schedule$73,812 – $139,067
Average elementary principal salary$155,081
Average middle school principal salary$167,895
Superintendent salary$236,900

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
201934/10044#3030California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
202228/10039#3444California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
202322/10022#4443California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
202424/10016#4756California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 27.2% → 2025 · 19.1% · −8.1pp
Suspension rate2024 · 0.0% → 2025 · 1.1% · +1.1pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresExcMet+
2025 · ELA807.5%20.0%
2025 · Math803.8%12.5%
2024 · ELA1065.7%19.8%
2024 · Math1075.6%18.7%
2023 · ELA1095.5%25.7%
2023 · Math1096.4%20.2%
2022 · ELA12710.2%23.6%
2022 · Math12713.4%22.8%
2019 · ELA15012.0%29.3%
2019 · Math15318.3%36.6%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019———15.8%33.6%1.0%1.0%+13.7pp
2022———12.2%24.0%32.8%0.5%+18.9pp
2023———6.0%23.5%33.1%0.2%-6.0pp
2024———5.5%18.5%26.3%0.2%-9.3pp
20252317#47116.0%17.1%18.9%1.2%+6.1pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA in grades 3–5 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
Group2018–192024–25Δ
Female0.0%21.3%+21.3pp
Male0.0%17.6%+17.6pp
Asian0.0%9.5%+9.5pp
Hispanic/Latino0.0%20.0%+20.0pp
Students with Disabilities0.0%22.7%+22.7pp
English Learners0.0%12.5%+12.5pp
Homeless0.0%26.7%+26.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged0.0%22.0%+22.0pp
All Students0.0%19.1%+19.1pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
GroupELAnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−1153Moderate−1253Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−1547Moderate−1447Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−1244Moderate−1344Moderate
English Learner−1930Moderate−930Moderate
English Learners Only−2925not categorised−1325not categorised
English Only−118not categorised−1318not categorised
Homeless Youth−313Average+113Average

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

07Growth source detailCDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures
ShowHide table 07 — Growth source detail
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

53 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, ELA: −11 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 14th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.14th pctile · −11 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

53 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, math: −12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 16th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.16th pctile · −12 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

08Funding source detailCDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure
ShowHide table 08 — Funding source detail

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$16,506 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 1,929 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$2,993 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 172

Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,121 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 172

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,150 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 60%Instruction support 16%Student services 8%Administration 10%Buildings & maintenance 7%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$16,506 per pupil
2020$15,567 per pupil
2019$15,161 per pupil
2018$14,400 per pupil
2017$13,814 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95127
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95127
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$128,786
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)28.93%
ZCTA population58,825
Median age38.7 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/mt-pleasant-elementary-8060"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Mt. Pleasant Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction