Mount Pleasant Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 4 public elementary schools run from the 9th to the 36th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.
K5Elementary
68Middle
912High
Mount Pleasant Elementary · grades K–8
Another district · grades 9–12
Elementary · 4 schools
from 9th to 36th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests
Valle Vista Elementary: 36th percentile, Developing
Ida Jew Academies: 23rd percentile, Needs Support
Robert Sanders Elementary: 17th percentile, Needs Support
Mt. Pleasant Elementary: 9th percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
0Strong
Middle · 2 schools
from 24th to 52nd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests
August Boeger Middle: 52nd percentile, Solid
Ida Jew Academies: 24th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong
← lower percentilehigher →
One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 5 ranked schools teaches two levels, so it appears in more than one picture.
5 ranked schools
Schools around the Mount Pleasant Elementary district
The average elementary school in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district had 17 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.
Middle schools
Which middle schools in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district score highest?
August Boeger Middle is highest, at the 52nd percentile.
That’s higher than 52 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).
Highest in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean
Where does Mount Pleasant Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?
The Mount Pleasant Elementary district spent $27,150 per student in the 2024–25 school year.
The typical California district spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Mount Pleasant Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.
Spending by function
Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.
Share by function, 2024–25
Instruction59%
Instruction support16%
Student services8%
Administration10%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.
What the district plans
$6.9 million
planned in its 2026–27 plan for 24 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 18% of its $39.3 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.
The plan in short
Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 120 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
Three actions take 59% of the money. The plan itself puts 45% of it toward staff.
Hire new teachers for class size reduction $1.9 million
Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day $1.7 million
Prepare Students for College and Career Readiness $475,485
21 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help
1 of the plan’s 24 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.
Actions whose titles name English learners
English learners $42,868
Largest of these
Designated and Integrated ELD Curriculum and ELD professional development for teachers for EL and LTEL$42,868
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students
It plans $4.0 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $4.0 million and estimates it spent $3.9 million, $0.1 million (2%) less than planned (our arithmetic).
$3.9 million spent (estimated)$4.0 million planned
What changed
The total is $206,727 (3%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day, which went from $1.9 million to $1.7 million.
Largest cuts
Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day−$200,000
Provide Support to Families of Most Vulnerable Student Subgroups−$158,431
Hire new teachers for class size reduction−$154,002
Largest increases
Prepare Students for College and Career Readiness+$92,010
Building Teacher and Admin Efficacy+$70,000
Additional Staff to Monitor Progress and Services for Our Most Vulnerable Student Populations+$52,743
New in the 2026–27 plan
Support teachers new to the teaching profession-Updated Action$451,300
Instructional Coaches to Strengthen Tier 1 Instruction and Intervention Services (Revised Action)$400,168
What its goals measure
Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure
2024–25
2025–26
Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 2
33%
32%
down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 2
20%
23%
up 3 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 3
22 in 100
18 in 100
4 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 3
1.7%
1.6%
down 0.1 pts
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The plan’s own titles and amounts
Hire new teachers for class size reduction · $1,909,879
Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day · $1,700,000
Prepare Students for College and Career Readiness · $475,485
The full plan3 goals, 18 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($6.9 million).
Where does the money go?
48% to Goal 1, Pupil Outcomes. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1Pupil Outcomes$3.3 million48% of action budgets
“Increase student success for all student subgroups in English Language Arts/Literacy, Math, and Science by providing high quality instruction that promotes college and career readiness with academic interventions and differentiated instruction to decrease the achievement gap” p. 19 ↗
10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.3 million (+$81,929)
Largest funded actions
Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day$1.7 millionaction 1.3 · p. 78 ↗
Prepare Students for College and Career Readiness$0.5 millionaction 1.7 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Instructional Coaches to Strengthen Tier 1 Instruction and Intervention Services (Revised Action)$0.4 millionaction 1.2 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Additional Staff to Monitor Progress and Services for Our Most Vulnerable Student Populations$0.3 millionaction 1.6 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Arts and Music$0.2 millionaction 1.8 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $10,000 is state funding counted toward those services
5 more funded actions in this goal
Supplemental Instructional Apps and Technology Support · action 1.5 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Building Teacher and Admin Efficacy · action 1.4 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Purchase and Implementation of i-Ready · action 1.9 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $31,825 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
AVID Implementation and Professional Development · action 1.1 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Library Services · action 1.10 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Extended Learning Support Beyond the Regular School Day−$0.2 million$1.9 million → $1.7 million · p. 78 ↗
Prepare Students for College and Career Readiness+$92,010$383,475 → $475,485 · p. 78 ↗
Building Teacher and Admin Efficacy+$70,000$10,000 → $80,000 · p. 78 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Instructional Coaches to Strengthen Tier 1 Instruction and Intervention Services (Revised Action) · $400,168 · p. 78 ↗new or renamed
Additional Staff to Monitor Progress and Services for Our Most Vulnerable Student Populations · $198,655 → $251,398 · p. 78 ↗+$52,743
Arts and Music · $233,420 → $226,576 · p. 79 ↗−$6,844
Supplemental Instructional Apps and Technology Support · $92,780 → $112,000 · p. 78 ↗+$19,220
Purchase and Implementation of i-Ready · $71,442 → $63,650 · p. 79 ↗−$7,792
AVID Implementation and Professional Development · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 78 ↗unchanged
Library Services · $1,859 → $10,000 · p. 79 ↗+$8,141
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 6 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 19 ↗.
Goal 2Provide resources to ensure that students are instructed by certificated, qualified teachers, ensure that…$2.6 million37% of action budgets
“Provide resources to ensure that students are instructed by certificated, qualified teachers, ensure that students have access to standards-based adopted curriculum, and students have clean and safe physical learning environments to learn.( State Priorities: 1 and 2)” p. 37 ↗
6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.6 million (+$19,248)
Largest funded actions
Hire new teachers for class size reduction$1.9 millionaction 2.1 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Support teachers new to the teaching profession-Updated Action$0.5 millionaction 2.2 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $20,000 is state funding counted toward those services
Supplemental materials to Support Core Instruction$0.2 millionaction 2.5 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $75,000 is state funding counted toward those services
Designated and Integrated ELD Curriculum and ELD professional development for teachers for EL and LTELunder $0.1 millionaction 2.6 · p. 79 ↗
Internet Access and Technology Devicesunder $0.1 millionaction 2.3 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
1 more funded action in this goal
Safe School Facilities · action 2.4 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Hire new teachers for class size reduction−$0.2 million$2.1 million → $1.9 million · p. 79 ↗
Supplemental materials to Support Core Instruction+$52,500$122,500 → $175,000 · p. 79 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Support teachers new to the teaching profession-Updated Action · $451,300 · p. 79 ↗new or renamed
Designated and Integrated ELD Curriculum and ELD professional development for teachers for EL and LTEL · $42,868 → $42,868 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
Internet Access and Technology Devices · $500 → $500 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
Safe School Facilities · $500 → $500 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 5 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 37 ↗.
Goal 3Create a safe and supportive learning environment at all school sites where students attend and are connected…$1.0 million15% of action budgets
“Create a safe and supportive learning environment at all school sites where students attend and are connected to their schools” p. 47 ↗
8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.3 million (−$307,904)
Parent Engagement$161,025action 3.7 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Provide Support to Families of Most Vulnerable Student Subgroups$139,850action 3.1 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $124,850 is state funding counted toward those services
Improve School Climate$120,000action 3.5 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $70,000 is state funding counted toward those services
Parent Engagement$103,397action 3.8 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
3 more funded actions in this goal
Improve School Climate · action 3.4 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$65,278
Improve Student Engagement and Attendance · action 3.3 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$50,000
Parent Engagement · action 3.6 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6,000 is state funding counted toward those services$14,000
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Provide Support to Families of Most Vulnerable Student Subgroups−$158,431$298,281 → $139,850 · p. 79 ↗
Community Schools−$135,411$485,411 → $350,000 · p. 79 ↗
Parent Engagement−$32,822$193,847 → $161,025 · p. 80 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Improve School Climate · $112,000 → $120,000 · p. 80 ↗+$8,000
Parent Engagement · $103,522 → $103,397 · p. 80 ↗−$125
Improve School Climate · $64,393 → $65,278 · p. 80 ↗+$885
Improve Student Engagement and Attendance · $40,000 → $50,000 · p. 80 ↗+$10,000
Parent Engagement · $14,000 → $14,000 · p. 80 ↗unchanged
How the plan measures it · 7 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 47 ↗.
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends
Student mix
2024–25 · October enrollment count, 1,516 students
1Hispanic or Latino77%
2Asian13%
3Two or more races2%
4White2%
5Black or African American2%
6Filipino1%
7Pacific Islander1%
8Not reported1%
9American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.
Free or reduced-price meals
75%
Across California, 63% of students qualify.
2024–25 · 1,136 of 1,512 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.
The district’s state records
Is the state giving the district extra help?
The state is giving Mount Pleasant Elementary extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.
How English learners moved up on the state’s English test
From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 46% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (141 of 305 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.
Which public schools in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district rank highest?
Elementary: Valle Vista Elementary, 36th percentile (Developing). Middle: August Boeger Middle, 52nd percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
Does living in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)
Are the public schools in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district good?
Mount Pleasant Elementary’s 4 public elementary schools run from the 9th to the 36th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 3 Needs Support. Mount Pleasant Elementary’s 2 public middle schools run from the 24th to the 52nd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.
How does chronic absence in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district compare with California?
The average elementary school in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district had 17 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.
How much does the Mount Pleasant Elementary district spend per student?
The Mount Pleasant Elementary district spent $27,150 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Mount Pleasant Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.
What is in the Mount Pleasant Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?
The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $6.9 million into 24 funded actions in 3 goals, 18% of its $39.3 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $3.3 million, 48% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.
Sources and methodology
This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Mount Pleasant Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26
Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.