ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Montera Middle · Oakland

Montera Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Montera posts 47% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

5555 Ascot Drive, 94611 (opens in new tab)·Oakland Unified·Oakland·Grades 6-8·695 students·58% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 879-3211·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4543
% Exceeded20%17%
% Met+47%39%
Growth-3.6+1.5
Absence24.4%18.5%
Suspension6.3%3.7%
Scope Score
45
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #908 statewide · #10 of 34 in Oakland Unified

Montera Middle scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 59th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “47% proficient” and call it done. Montera deserves a closer read. The school sits in Oakland, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 30th to the 59th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 47% of students meet the standard today, above the 32% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 640%35%40%56%51%
Grade 738%47%43%41%62%
Grade 843%45%50%42%52%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 624%27%26%50%37%
Grade 722%34%33%26%50%
Grade 825%30%25%28%28%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
30%
49%
Grade 6 · 51% proficient
26%
36%
38%
Grade 7 · 62% proficient
19%
33%
48%
Grade 8 · 52% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.8pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.3%
State 16.8%
3.4pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.6pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
46.7%
State 39.3%
7.4pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
24.4%
State 18.5%
5.8pp above state avg
Suspension rate
6.3%
State 3.7%
2.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
2.8%
State 18.0%
15.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask how English learners are supported, and what changes for them after they reclassify.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Montera Middle in Oakland, 37.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 24.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Montera Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.4% Math proficient); Black students (27.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 381 students tested.

All students at this school: 47% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 47%, district —, state 39%47%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 29%, district 21%, state 32%29% · −18 vs school
MaleMale: this school 46%, district 29%, state 42%46% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 48%, district 31%, state 44%48% · +1 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 19%, district 17%, state 26%19% · −28 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 35%, district 19%, state 32%35% · −11 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 73%, district 65%, state 56%73% · +27 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 62%, district 50%, state 56%62% · +15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 19%, district 12%, state 15%19% · −28 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 67%, district 52%, state 72%67% · +20 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 6%, state 11%10% · −37 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 1.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 24.4%, district 30.6%, state 18.5%24.4% · +5.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.3%, district —, state 3.7%6.3% · +2.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–622.7%
Grades 7–825.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 21:118:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience10.4 years
Fully credentialed60%
First-year teachers13%
Intern / emergency permit6.1%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,696 – $109,878
Principal salary$149,098 – $185,804
Superintendent salary$378,797

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,429, CA average $14,815$24,429 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$610 per student

$610 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$28,286 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction57%
Instruction support19%
Student services6%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,173 per pupil
2019$16,594 per pupil
2018$15,652 per pupil
2017$11,195 per pupil
2016$11,617 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Black26.2%
District 19.7% · CA 4.8%
Hispanic25.0%
District 50.7% · CA 56.1%
White21.0%
District 10.1% · CA 19.9%
Other20.1%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian7.6%
District 9.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 58.0% (6pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$181K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.54M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+79% · CA 35%
ZIP population40,116
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Montera Middle a good middle school?

Montera Middle has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 59th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #908 statewide. 20.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.4 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Montera Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 46.7% of students at Montera Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,336 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Montera Middle rank in California?

Montera Middle ranks #908 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 59th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Montera Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Montera Middle decreases by 3.6 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Montera Middle?

24.4% of students at Montera Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 6.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Montera Middle compare to other schools in Oakland?

Montera Middle scores 45/100 (59th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 695 students. Use the schools in Oakland page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Montera Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Montera Middle in Oakland, 37.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 24.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Montera Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.4% Math proficient); Black students (27.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 381 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.3%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 54th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.6pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 54th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
46.7%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 56th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
24.4%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.3%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 39th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
2.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 25th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 624621%30%22%27%51%+4
Grade 721726%36%18%19%62%+15
Grade 820719%33%22%26%52%+6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 624721%16%22%41%37%+2
Grade 721422%28%27%23%50%+16
Grade 820512%16%21%51%28%−4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1120510%23%51%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38137.3%+13−1
Black/African American17227.3%+6−5
Hispanic/Latino16644.6%+23+6
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Montera Middle ←4520.3%46.7%−3.66.3%
Piedmont Middle1.8 mi7854.9%82.9%−8.11.7%
Downtown Charter Academy3.4 mi7445.2%75.8%−7.60.5%
Edna Brewer Middle1.8 mi4828.0%52.5%+0.06.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193130#140511.7%31.9%29.9%7.9%+1.9pp
20224160#86016.1%36.4%35.6%7.6%+6.4pp
20233947#115313.3%36.2%57.6%12.8%+4.5pp
20244056#98316.0%40.5%24.8%7.0%-17.9pp
20254559#90820.3%46.7%24.4%6.3%-3.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female29.9%24.9%-5.0pp
Male30.1%24.1%-6.0pp
Asian19.7%9.1%-10.6pp
Black/African American39.4%37.3%-2.1pp
Hispanic/Latino29.9%34.1%+4.2pp
Two or More Races16.7%15.9%-0.8pp
Students with Disabilities45.6%42.3%-3.3pp
English Learners27.1%51.2%+24.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38.4%37.4%-1.0pp
All Students30.0%24.5%-5.5pp
Filipino24.0%
Homeless64.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction