ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Merritt Trace Elementary · San Jose

Merritt Trace Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Merritt Trace posts 33% meeting the standard and 16.1% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

651 Dana Avenue, 95126 (opens in new tab)·San Jose Unified·San Jose·Grades TK-5·829 students·54% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 535-6257
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded16%21%
% Met+33%43%
Growth-8.7-2.9
Absence25.8%17.9%
Suspension4.4%1.6%
Scope Score
35
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,073 statewide · #17 of 27 in San Jose Unified

Merritt Trace Elementary scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 29th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “33% proficient” and call it done. Merritt Trace deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 29th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 33% meet the standard today, versus 39% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 345%26%38%32%41%
Grade 454%34%34%36%33%
Grade 542%53%42%36%37%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 336%28%34%29%37%
Grade 437%20%29%32%25%
Grade 518%23%18%27%23%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
21%
58%
Grade 3 · 42% proficient
16%
17%
67%
Grade 4 · 33% proficient
15%
22%
63%
Grade 5 · 37% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.4pp across grades; the floor slips 3.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
16.1%
State 21.3%
5.2pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-8.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
32.7%
State 42.7%
9.9pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
25.8%
State 17.9%
7.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.4%
State 1.6%
2.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.4%
State 18.0%
6.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Merritt Trace Elementary in San Jose, 18.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Merritt Trace Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (23.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 218 students tested.

All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 43%32%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 25%, state 32%20% · −12 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 15%, district 22%, state 32%15% · −17 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 29%, district 46%, state 44%29% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 36%, district 45%, state 42%36% · +4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 6%, district 7%, state 11%6% · −27 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 70%, district 67%, state 56%70% · +38 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 14%, district 16%, state 15%14% · −18 vs school

8 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 25.8%, district 24.3%, state 17.9%25.8% · +7.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.4%, district —, state 1.6%4.4% · +2.8pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (33.2% vs 20.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.8%
TK/K33.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 21:122:1
Teaching staff39 teachers
Avg. experience12.4 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit6.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,000 – $134,400
Principal salary$146,301 – $163,630
Superintendent salary$354,153

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,716, CA average $14,815$21,716 · spent at this school
Federal share$555 per student

$555 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,059 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,878 per pupil
2019$12,931 per pupil
2018$12,414 per pupil
2017$11,570 per pupil
2016$11,975 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic71.8%
District 54.0% · CA 56.1%
White15.2%
District 20.2% · CA 19.9%
Other8.1%
District 9.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.0%
District 14.1% · CA 10.2%
Black1.9%
District 2.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 54.3% (10pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$129K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.21M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+54% · CA 35%
ZIP population38,327
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 829 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 30% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Merritt Trace Elementary a good elementary school?

Merritt Trace Elementary has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 29th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,073 statewide. 16.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.2 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Merritt Trace Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.7% of students at Merritt Trace Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 16.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 16.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 779 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Merritt Trace Elementary rank in California?

Merritt Trace Elementary ranks #4,073 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 29th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Merritt Trace Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Merritt Trace Elementary decreases by 8.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Merritt Trace Elementary?

25.8% of students at Merritt Trace Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Merritt Trace Elementary compare to other schools in San Jose?

Merritt Trace Elementary scores 35/100 (29th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 829 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Merritt Trace Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Merritt Trace Elementary in San Jose, 18.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Merritt Trace Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (23.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 218 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
16.1%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 45th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-8.7pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
32.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 42th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
25.8%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 37th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.4%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 27th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311221%21%16%43%41%−2
Grade 413116%17%21%47%33%−12
Grade 514515%22%23%40%37%−11
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311418%18%21%42%37%−9
Grade 413112%13%29%46%25%−16
Grade 514614%9%24%53%23%−12
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1114710%20%47%23%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21818.8%−8−19
Hispanic/Latino28323.3%−7−16
English Learners1156.1%−1−4
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Merritt Trace Elementary ←3516.1%32.7%−8.74.4%
Washington Open Elementary1.1 mi7649.4%76.6%+7.50.4%
Hammer Montessori at Galarza Elementary2.9 mi7243.3%72.2%+0.21.0%
Sherman Oaks Elementary1.4 mi5117.4%35.0%−0.91.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193736#351015.6%38.7%13.3%1.4%-10.6pp
20223856#254311.2%30.7%33.2%2.8%+10.6pp
20233539#349914.6%32.5%35.0%4.6%-6.1pp
20243942#331115.1%32.1%27.6%3.6%+0.6pp
20253529#407316.1%32.7%25.8%4.4%-8.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 19 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female12.2%26.8%+14.6pp
Male14.3%25.4%+11.1pp
Asian13.8%3.6%-10.2pp
Black/African American16.2%18.8%+2.6pp
White12.5%7.7%-4.8pp
Hispanic/Latino14.8%32.5%+17.7pp
Two or More Races7.1%13.5%+6.4pp
Students with Disabilities15.1%39.0%+23.9pp
English Learners13.5%36.7%+23.2pp
Homeless63.6%60.0%-3.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.2%38.0%+20.8pp
All Students13.3%26.1%+12.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction