Math
51%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Public elementary school
McNear Elementary
Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
49% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 51% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Culture First
What this means for your family
Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(707) 778-4752
DistrictPetaluma City Elementary
PrincipalMelissa Becker
GradesTK-6
Enrollment343 students
English
49%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
343Total enrollment
Chronic absence
13%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 46% | 45% |
| 2022 | 48% | 55% |
| 2023 | 53% | 52% |
| 2024 | 51% | 49% |
| 2025 | 51% | 49% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
22%ProficientStandard Met
29%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
18%MinimalStandard Not Met
32%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
26%ProficientStandard Met
23%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
24%MinimalStandard Not Met
27%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Has stayed near the 61st percentile since 2019.
Most rating sites would stop at “51% proficient” and call it done. McNear deserves a closer read. One in four of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
193 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 44 tracked
McNear Elementary scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 51% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53% | 58% | 52% | 58% | 43% |
| Grade 4 | 55% | 47% | 55% | 44% | 55% |
| Grade 5 | 38% | 52% | 51% | 43% | 54% |
| Grade 6 | 63% | 57% | 61% | 70% | 59% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53% | 48% | 57% | 55% | 48% |
| Grade 4 | 55% | 55% | 60% | 55% | 51% |
| Grade 5 | 40% | 48% | 49% | 49% | 53% |
| Grade 6 | 55% | 59% | 61% | 47% | 55% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
More than half of students here meet the standard. One in five clear it by a lot.
ELA53% met or exceeded
Exceeded 27%Met 26%Nearly Met 22%Not Met 25%
Math52% met or exceeded
Exceeded 22%Met 30%Nearly Met 21%Not Met 27%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 24% | 51% | Below avg · p40 | 12.5% | 0.9% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | Average · p50 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope4039
% Exceeded24%21%
% Met+51%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Below avg · p40Average · p50
Absence12.5%17.9%
Suspension0.9%1.6%
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At McNear Elementary in Petaluma, 33.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 25.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. McNear Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.8% Math proficient); White students (59.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 63 students tested.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 53% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 53%, district —, state 43%53%
WhiteWhite: this school 62%, district 59%, state 56%62% · +9 vs school
MaleMale: this school 50%, district 43%, state 42%50% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 56%, district 47%, state 44%56% · +3 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 25%, state 32%34% · −19 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 24%, district 21%, state 32%24% · −29 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 16%, district 18%, state 15%16% · −37 vs school
7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 16.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.4pp.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
No student-group growth record is available for this school in this data release.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 23 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher23 · district 24
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience14.3 years
Fully credentialed94%
First-year teachers5%
PrincipalMelissa Becker
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.5%, district 16.5%, state 17.9%12.5% · −5.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.9%, district —, state 1.6%0.9% · −0.7pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.7%
TK/K16.2%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent
It spends $18,772 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$138 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,772, CA average $14,491$18,772 · spent at this school
Federal share$138 per student
This schoolCalifornia
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
One in four of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 43% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino20.4% · district 35.4% · CA 56.1%
White69.1% · district 50.6% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.3% · district 3.0% · CA 10.2%
Other8.2% · district 10.1% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch27.4% · CA 64%
Median income$117K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.04M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+47% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,785
Median age44 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McNear Elementary | Public | Solid | 24% | 51% | School being viewed | |
| Grant Elementary | Public | Strong | 43% | 72% | 0.4 mi | |
| Mary Collins Charter School at Cherry Valley | Charter | Strong | 25% | 55% | 1.8 mi | |
| Old Adobe Elementary Charter | Charter | Solid | 24% | 51% | 3.4 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
6 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Petaluma City Elementary.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
No school established for this stage.
High school · 9–12
Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is McNear Elementary a good elementary school?
McNear Elementary has a Scope Score of 40 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,253 statewide. 24.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.0 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are McNear Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 50.8% of students at McNear Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 24.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 24.4% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 266 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does McNear Elementary rank in California?
McNear Elementary ranks #2,253 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is McNear Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At McNear Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks below avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 40th percentile, behind the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at McNear Elementary?
12.5% of students at McNear Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does McNear Elementary compare to other schools in Petaluma?
McNear Elementary scores 40/100 (61st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 343 students. Use the schools in Petaluma page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does McNear Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At McNear Elementary in Petaluma, 33.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 25.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. McNear Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.8% Math proficient); White students (59.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 63 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 6 things our score weighs
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 69 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 24.4% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 50.8% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Below avg | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 12.5% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.9% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 13.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
McNear Elementary: reading the evidence
McNear posts 51% meeting the standard, and 24.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
McNear Elementary is ranked #2,253 statewide · #3 of 6 in Petaluma City Elementary.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 24.4% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 50.8% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Below avg | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 12.5% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.9% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 13.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 53 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 56 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
- ↓ vs CA average · 40th pctile
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 59 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 2.1pp higher vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 56 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↓ vs CA 18.0% · index 45 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 44 | 20% | 23% | 27% | 30% | 43% | +0 |
| Grade 4 | 38 | 32% | 24% | 24% | 21% | 55% | +11 |
| Grade 5 | 50 | 30% | 24% | 22% | 24% | 54% | +6 |
| Grade 6 | 61 | 26% | 33% | 16% | 25% | 59% | +13 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 46 | 15% | 33% | 17% | 35% | 48% | +2 |
| Grade 4 | 37 | 22% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 51% | +10 |
| Grade 5 | 51 | 27% | 25% | 18% | 29% | 53% | +18 |
| Grade 6 | 60 | 22% | 33% | 20% | 25% | 55% | +21 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 51 | 22% | 22% | 45% | 12% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 63 | 33.3% | +8 | −5 |
| White | 127 | 59.8% | +1 | −2 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 27 | 25.9% | +3 | −13 |
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McNear Elementary ← | — | 40 | 24.4% | 50.8% | +8.0pp | +69 pts | 0.9% |
| Grant Elementary | 0.4 mi | 55 | 42.9% | 72.2% | −10.3pp | — | 1.5% |
| Mary Collins Charter School at Cherry Valley | 1.8 mi | 53 | 25.3% | 54.7% | +8.4pp | — | 2.0% |
| Old Adobe Elementary Charter | 3.4 mi | 44 | 24.4% | 51.1% | −9.3pp | — | 1.1% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 39 | 56 | #2391 | 18.2% | 49.0% | 6.4% | 1.1% | -14.6pp |
| 2022 | 42 | 66 | #1921 | 20.0% | 51.4% | 18.3% | 2.6% | -3.1pp |
| 2023 | 50 | 76 | #1349 | 30.2% | 54.0% | 19.7% | 1.2% | -4.5pp |
| 2024 | 46 | 70 | #1736 | 28.0% | 50.6% | 10.4% | 1.7% | -10.1pp |
| 2025 | 40 | 61 | #2253 | 24.4% | 50.8% | 12.5% | 0.9% | +8.0pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.2% | 14.9% | +9.7pp |
| Male | 6.7% | 9.1% | +2.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.1% | 20.5% | +9.4pp |
| White | 2.8% | 9.4% | +6.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 10.7% | 20.0% | +9.3pp |
| English Learners | 9.1% | 21.9% | +12.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.7% | 17.6% | +6.9pp |
| All Students | 6.0% | 11.9% | +5.9pp |
| Two or More Races | — | 15.4% | — |
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/mcnear-elementary-1973"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="McNear Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction