Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa posts 40% meeting the standard and 19.8% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 20% | 40% | -3.7 | 22.8% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa deserves a closer read. It sits at the 44th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 10th to the 44th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 40% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 49% | 45% | 44% | 45% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 47% | 41% | 58% | 38% | 43% |
| Grade 5 | 28% | 40% | 38% | 60% | 46% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 51% | 46% | 37% | 42% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 43% | 44% | 53% | 34% | 43% |
| Grade 5 | 15% | 29% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 4.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa in Altadena, 21.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa trails its district average for low-income students by 14.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 176 students tested.
7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +0.4pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (33.8% vs 14.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$386 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 34% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa a good elementary school?
What are Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa's CAASPP test scores?
How does Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa rank in California?
Is Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa?
How does Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa compare to other schools in Altadena?
How does Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 69
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 34
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 108 | 22% | 19% | 19% | 40% | 41% | −3 |
| Grade 4 | 96 | 24% | 19% | 19% | 39% | 43% | −2 |
| Grade 5 | 90 | 22% | 23% | 22% | 32% | 46% | −2 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 108 | 15% | 26% | 18% | 42% | 41% | −5 |
| Grade 4 | 96 | 18% | 25% | 21% | 36% | 43% | +1 |
| Grade 5 | 91 | 18% | 11% | 20% | 52% | 29% | −7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 91 | 11% | 23% | 49% | 16% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 176 | 21.0% | −14 | −17 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 192 | 31.3% | −6 | −8 |
| White | 48 | 85.4% | +13 | +24 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary W. Jackson STEAM Multilingual Magnet Elementa ← | — | 40 | 19.8% | 40.2% | −3.7 | 0.1% |
| Paradise Canyon Elementary | 2.2 mi | 81 | 55.1% | 83.7% | +5.9 | 0.4% |
| Odyssey Charter | 1.1 mi | 66 | 52.3% | 76.4% | −9.2 | 1.2% |
| OCS - South | 1.1 mi | 58 | 35.9% | 62.1% | +6.4 | 1.8% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 26 | 10 | #4930 | 20.5% | 38.9% | 8.7% | 0.6% | -28.5pp |
| 2022 | 39 | 58 | #2432 | 20.5% | 40.8% | 23.3% | 0.0% | -11.0pp |
| 2023 | 40 | 53 | #2705 | 23.7% | 42.2% | 23.1% | 0.0% | -10.4pp |
| 2024 | 50 | 68 | #1861 | 19.7% | 43.2% | 17.3% | 0.3% | +7.1pp |
| 2025 | 40 | 44 | #3240 | 19.8% | 40.2% | 22.8% | 0.1% | -3.7pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 17 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 8.4% | 25.2% | +16.8pp |
| Male | 9.1% | 21.2% | +12.1pp |
| Black/African American | 18.3% | 21.7% | +3.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.8% | 28.8% | +20.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 10.0% | +10.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 6.8% | 26.4% | +19.6pp |
| English Learners | 9.2% | 31.4% | +22.2pp |
| Homeless | 20.0% | 45.8% | +25.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 11.8% | 29.4% | +17.6pp |
| All Students | 8.7% | 23.0% | +14.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 33.3% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction