ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Marshall Academy of the Arts · Long Beach

Marshall Academy of the Arts: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Marshall Academy of the Arts posts 55% meeting the standard, and 26.5% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

5870 East Wardlow Road, 90808 (opens in new tab)·Long Beach Unified·Long Beach·Grades 6-8·940 students·45% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 429-7013
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5143
% Exceeded26%17%
% Met+55%39%
Growth-1.6+1.5
Absence17.7%18.5%
Suspension4.5%3.7%
Scope Score
51
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #612 statewide · #8 of 23 in Long Beach Unified

Marshall Academy of the Arts scores 51 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 73rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “55% proficient” and call it done. Marshall Academy of the Arts deserves a closer read. The school sits in Long Beach, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 73rd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 55% meet the standard today, versus 63% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 671%64%52%58%62%
Grade 767%68%63%63%65%
Grade 860%64%59%66%58%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 667%45%41%42%48%
Grade 761%51%47%51%50%
Grade 852%45%45%44%48%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

30%
32%
38%
Grade 6 · 62% proficient
25%
40%
35%
Grade 7 · 65% proficient
25%
33%
42%
Grade 8 · 58% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 4.7pp across grades; the floor slips 3.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
26.5%
State 16.8%
9.6pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-1.6pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
55.2%
State 39.3%
16.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.7%
State 18.5%
0.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.5%
State 3.7%
0.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.1%
State 18.0%
6.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Marshall Academy of the Arts in Long Beach, 47.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Marshall Academy of the Arts outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (53.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 437 students tested.

All students at this school: 55% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 55%, district —, state 39%55%
FemaleFemale: this school 56%, district 46%, state 44%56% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 47%, district 38%, state 32%47% · −9 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 35%, state 32%41% · −14 vs school
MaleMale: this school 54%, district 44%, state 42%54% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 70%, district 70%, state 56%70% · +15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 24%, district 19%, state 15%24% · −31 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 34%, district 29%, state 26%34% · −21 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 72%, district 63%, state 56%72% · +17 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 73%, district 65%, state 72%73% · +17 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 7%, district 12%, state 11%7% · −49 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 73%, district 70%, state 65%73% · +18 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.7%, district 25.9%, state 18.5%17.7% · −0.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.5%, district —, state 3.7%4.5% · +0.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–617.2%
Grades 7–818.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 24:124:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience14.0 years
Fully credentialed81%
First-year teachers8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,703 – $137,718
Principal salary$163,293 – $190,880
Superintendent salary$421,034

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,728, CA average $14,815$18,728 · spent at this school
Federal share$448 per student

$448 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,199 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support13%
Student services11%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,498 per pupil
2019$12,985 per pupil
2018$13,175 per pupil
2017$12,489 per pupil
2016$12,227 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic49.8%
District 59.2% · CA 56.1%
White22.4%
District 11.8% · CA 19.9%
Other12.3%
District 9.9% · CA 9.0%
Black9.5%
District 12.0% · CA 4.8%
Asian6.0%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 45.0% (19pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$138K · CA $85K
Median home value$954K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+47% · CA 35%
ZIP population39,317
Median age45 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 38% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Marshall Academy of the Arts a good middle school?

Marshall Academy of the Arts has a Scope Score of 51 out of 100, placing it in the 73rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #612 statewide. 26.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 9.6 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Marshall Academy of the Arts's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 55.2% of students at Marshall Academy of the Arts met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 26.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 28.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 26.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,852 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Marshall Academy of the Arts rank in California?

Marshall Academy of the Arts ranks #612 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 73rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Marshall Academy of the Arts getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Marshall Academy of the Arts decreases by 1.6 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Marshall Academy of the Arts?

17.7% of students at Marshall Academy of the Arts are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Marshall Academy of the Arts compare to other schools in Long Beach?

Marshall Academy of the Arts scores 51/100 (73rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 940 students. Use the schools in Long Beach page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Marshall Academy of the Arts serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Marshall Academy of the Arts in Long Beach, 47.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Marshall Academy of the Arts outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (53.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 437 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
26.5%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 61th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-1.6pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
55.2%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 63th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.5%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 47th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.1%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 36th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 631130%32%18%20%62%+16
Grade 730425%40%19%16%65%+17
Grade 831425%33%23%19%58%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 631027%21%24%28%48%+13
Grade 730227%23%26%24%50%+16
Grade 831125%23%22%30%48%+16
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1131512%26%53%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged43747.8%+6+10
Hispanic/Latino46853.2%+8+14
White20377.8%+1+16
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Marshall Academy of the Arts ←5126.5%55.2%−1.64.5%
Helen Keller Middle1.3 mi5528.6%60.0%−1.01.6%
Stanford Middle1.3 mi5531.5%61.1%+0.56.9%
Bancroft Middle1.6 mi4821.1%49.3%+6.39.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194767#65331.1%62.9%9.5%3.6%-12.7pp
20225077#49327.1%56.3%24.2%5.4%-0.3pp
20235375#53722.8%50.9%26.2%5.1%+5.3pp
20244770#65724.1%54.0%18.4%4.1%+4.9pp
20255173#61226.5%55.2%17.7%4.5%-1.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.0%16.5%+7.5pp
Male9.9%19.2%+9.3pp
Asian2.6%7.0%+4.4pp
Black/African American17.7%31.2%+13.5pp
Filipino4.0%
White7.7%3.4%-4.3pp
Hispanic/Latino9.9%18.6%+8.7pp
Two or More Races12.8%14.3%+1.5pp
Students with Disabilities14.4%26.0%+11.6pp
English Learners20.0%17.9%-2.1pp
Homeless18.5%27.5%+9.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.3%24.8%+11.5pp
All Students9.5%17.7%+8.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction