ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Maple Elementary · Hesperia

Maple Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Maple posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 8.0pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

10616 Maple Street, 92345 (opens in new tab)·Hesperia Unified·Hesperia·Grades TK-6·988 students·84% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 244-3096·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3245
% Exceeded9%21%
% Met+24%43%
Growth+8.0-2.9
Absence35.1%17.9%
Suspension2.1%1.6%
Scope Score
32
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #4,475 statewide · #6 of 18 in Hesperia Unified

Maple Elementary scores 32 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 22nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. Maple deserves a closer read. The school sits in Hesperia, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 22nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 24% meet the standard today, versus 31% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 333%23%25%20%18%
Grade 434%22%28%26%26%
Grade 534%27%32%31%30%
Grade 644%30%38%39%39%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 331%28%23%24%20%
Grade 433%21%23%22%25%
Grade 519%25%25%23%24%
Grade 634%27%38%32%36%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
83%
Grade 3 · 17% proficient
10%
16%
74%
Grade 4 · 26% proficient
11%
19%
70%
Grade 5 · 30% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
8.6%
State 21.3%
12.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+8.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
23.6%
State 42.7%
19.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
35.1%
State 17.9%
17.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
4.4%
State 18.0%
13.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Maple Elementary in Hesperia, 25.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Maple Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 457 students tested.

All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 43%27%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 25%, district 21%, state 32%25% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 23%, state 32%28% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 26%, district 25%, state 44%26% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 23%, state 42%30% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 13%, district 6%, state 11%13% · −14 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 6%, state 15%10% · −18 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 50%, district 34%, state 56%50% · +23 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 14.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 35.1%, district 34.9%, state 17.9%35.1% · +17.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.1%, district —, state 1.6%2.1% · +0.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–633.3%
TK/K48.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 24:125:1
Teaching staff41 teachers
Avg. experience11.7 years
Fully credentialed77%
First-year teachers2%
Intern / emergency permit11.0%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,013 – $140,030
Principal salary$176,070 – $197,418
Superintendent salary$270,988

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $35,849, CA average $14,815$35,849 · spent at this school
Federal share$544 per student

$544 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,833 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support9%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,592 per pupil
2019$12,265 per pupil
2018$12,694 per pupil
2017$10,574 per pupil
2016$10,016 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic84.3%
District 77.6% · CA 56.1%
White7.2%
District 12.6% · CA 19.9%
Black4.3%
District 6.3% · CA 4.8%
Other3.9%
District 2.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.4%
District 0.8% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 84.0% (20pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$69K · CA $85K
Median home value$401K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+11% · CA 35%
ZIP population88,706
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 988 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Maple Elementary a good elementary school?

Maple Elementary has a Scope Score of 32 out of 100, placing it in the 22nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,475 statewide. 8.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Maple Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.6% of students at Maple Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 15.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 771 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Maple Elementary rank in California?

Maple Elementary ranks #4,475 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Maple Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Maple Elementary increases by 8.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Maple Elementary?

35.1% of students at Maple Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Maple Elementary compare to other schools in Hesperia?

Maple Elementary scores 32/100 (22nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 988 students. Use the schools in Hesperia page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Maple Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Maple Elementary in Hesperia, 25.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Maple Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 457 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
8.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 38th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+8.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 53th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.6%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 35th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
35.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 22th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 46th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
4.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 32th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31375%12%26%56%18%−26
Grade 411210%16%26%48%26%−19
Grade 513111%19%27%44%30%−18
Grade 615115%25%23%38%39%−7
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31408%12%30%50%20%−26
Grade 41167%18%35%40%25%−17
Grade 513511%13%24%52%24%−12
Grade 615217%19%22%41%36%+1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111354%13%50%33%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged45725.8%−0−12
Hispanic/Latino45128.6%+1−10
English Learners10612.3%+5+2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Maple Elementary ←328.6%23.6%+8.02.1%
Mojave River Academy - Rockview Park1 mi452.9%10.7%0.6%
Shadow Ridge2.1 mi435.1%19.1%+21.60.6%
Hollyvale Elementary2.6 mi324.5%16.2%+0.50.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193222#428810.2%30.6%12.8%3.5%-5.1pp
20223033#38549.1%24.3%50.8%1.3%+0.8pp
20233541#336710.4%26.2%40.8%1.2%+3.8pp
20243428#41229.9%24.4%36.5%2.2%+4.9pp
20253222#44758.6%23.6%35.1%2.1%+8.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.3%33.8%+18.5pp
Male10.5%37.7%+27.2pp
Black/African American34.2%46.0%+11.8pp
Hispanic/Latino9.2%36.0%+26.8pp
Students with Disabilities18.9%41.3%+22.4pp
English Learners7.9%30.4%+22.5pp
Foster Youth9.1%42.4%+33.3pp
Homeless6.7%36.0%+29.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.8%36.5%+23.7pp
All Students12.8%35.8%+23.0pp
Two or More Races42.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction