ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lilac · Valley Center

Lilac: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Lilac posts 37% meeting the standard and 15.7% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

30109 Lilac Road, 92082 (opens in new tab)·Valley Center-Pauma Unified·Valley Center·Grades TK-5·438 students·56% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 751-1042·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded16%21%
% Met+37%43%
Growth-2.4-2.9
Absence22.6%17.9%
Suspension1.1%1.6%
Scope Score
47
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #2,252 statewide · #1 of 3 in Valley Center-Pauma Unified

Lilac scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “37% proficient” and call it done. Lilac deserves a closer read. The school sits in Valley Center, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 61st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 37% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%29%27%30%37%
Grade 444%35%32%28%40%
Grade 548%52%35%27%44%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%33%27%39%38%
Grade 437%28%35%30%38%
Grade 532%34%23%23%26%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

23%
14%
63%
Grade 3 · 37% proficient
16%
23%
61%
Grade 4 · 39% proficient
15%
29%
56%
Grade 5 · 44% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.5pp across grades; the floor rises 7.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
15.7%
State 21.3%
5.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-2.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
37.1%
State 42.7%
5.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.6%
State 17.9%
4.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
16.1%
State 18.0%
1.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Lilac in Valley Center, 32.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 22.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lilac outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 134 students tested.

All students at this school: 37% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 37%, district —, state 43%37%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 30%, district 19%, state 32%30% · −7 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 18%, state 32%30% · −7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 22%, state 42%34% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 25%, state 44%41% · +4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 6%, district 3%, state 11%6% · −31 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 56%, district 40%, state 56%56% · +18 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 17%, district 6%, state 15%17% · −20 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.6%, district 33.9%, state 17.9%22.6% · +4.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 1.6%1.1% · −0.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–624.0%
TK/K23.7%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Valley Center Middle, which scores 21 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 24:122:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience15.8 years
Fully credentialed86%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,317 – $124,180
Principal salary$143,798 – $180,232
Superintendent salary$278,588

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,720, CA average $14,815$17,720 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,167 per student

$1,167 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,399 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction54%
Instruction support14%
Student services10%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,715 per pupil
2019$11,926 per pupil
2018$12,289 per pupil
2017$12,404 per pupil
2016$12,162 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic63.2%
District 64.6% · CA 56.1%
White26.3%
District 19.1% · CA 19.9%
Other8.2%
District 14.6% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.1%
District 1.0% · CA 10.2%
Black1.1%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 56.4% (7pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$127K · CA $85K
Median home value$834K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+34% · CA 35%
ZIP population21,727
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 40% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lilac a good elementary school?

Lilac has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,252 statewide. 15.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lilac's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 37.1% of students at Lilac met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 15.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 15.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 434 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lilac rank in California?

Lilac ranks #2,252 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lilac getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lilac decreases by 2.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lilac?

22.6% of students at Lilac are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lilac compare to other schools in Valley Center?

Lilac scores 47/100 (61st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 438 students. Use the schools in Valley Center page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Lilac serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lilac in Valley Center, 32.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 22.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lilac outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 134 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
15.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 45th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-2.4pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 67th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
37.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 46th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 54th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
16.1%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 48th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37123%14%30%34%37%−7
Grade 47316%23%22%38%40%−5
Grade 57315%29%19%37%44%−4
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37121%17%27%35%38%−8
Grade 47312%26%34%27%38%−3
Grade 5737%19%26%48%26%−9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/117315%25%41%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13432.1%+9−6
Hispanic/Latino13732.1%+7−7
English Learners563.6%+1−7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lilac ←4715.7%37.1%−2.41.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194455#247916.4%39.2%13.5%0.2%+2.4pp
20224569#176312.4%35.1%39.6%0.2%+11.9pp
20234051#27919.4%29.9%37.4%1.3%+1.8pp
20243736#366910.6%29.5%25.4%1.1%-9.5pp
20254761#225215.7%37.1%22.6%1.1%-2.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.2%22.8%+9.6pp
Male14.1%23.0%+8.9pp
Filipino0.0%
Hispanic/Latino12.1%25.1%+13.0pp
American Indian/Alaska Native40.0%72.7%+32.7pp
Two or More Races26.3%31.8%+5.5pp
Students with Disabilities21.2%26.6%+5.4pp
English Learners11.6%21.6%+10.0pp
Military-Connected28.0%14.8%-13.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.7%29.1%+13.4pp
All Students13.6%22.9%+9.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction