Independent charter school · Alum Rock Union Elementary · San Jose, California

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy — Rating & test scores

San Jose · 5–8 · 416 students (2024–25)

1250 South King Road, 95122kippnorcal.org ↗(408) 251-5600

66thpercentileSolid

The dots are California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built →

Scope Score

Weighted composite · 2025–26
A weighted mix of six measures.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academyhigher than 66 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academyhigher than 66 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academyhigher than 66 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Near California in English (reading and writing) and math: 52% and 41% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8, spring 2026, against 49% and 37%.

Source

Source: California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students: all students tested in grades 6–8: 297
Comparison: California: CDE’s grade 6, 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).

From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).

This rating covers grades 6–8. Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy teaches 5–8: grade 5 results ↓

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy and KIPP Heartwood Academy share this address in the state’s school directory. OpenStreetMap maps the grounds as one campus. Which buildings each school uses here isn’t mapped.

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

On spring 2025 tests, students in grades 5–8 scored below what the state expected in English (−6 pts) and math (−17 pts). The state bases that expectation on each student’s earlier scores.

Sources

The sentence above: CDE growth model, 2025. Students with scores in both years in grades 5–8: 397. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. Evidence ↓

Is Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy a good middle school?

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy scores higher than 66 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools: 66th percentile, Solid, spring 2026. Evidence ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 9 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 14 in 100 at the average middle school in the Alum Rock Union Elementary district. 1.4% of students (6 of 417) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. Evidence ↓

Did students here score above what the state expected?

Below what the state expected, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 5–8 scored −6 points against the state’s expected score in English, which the state calls Moderate. In math, they scored −17 points, which it calls Moderate.

Included in this measure: 397 students

Evidence ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 48% of low-income students in grades 5–8 at Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy in San Jose scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $5.9 million is planned for 30 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 76% of its $7.8 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Evidence ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓

Academic achievement

How did students here do on state tests?

Near California in both subjects.

State tests (CAASPP), spring 2026

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 52% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 41% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.

Source

Source: California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students: all students tested in grades 6–8: 297
Comparison: California: CDE’s grades 6–8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English, 1,254,800 in math tested). The comparisons use the same grades and year.

AdvancedProficientBelow the standard

English

Grades 6–8 · spring 2026 · 297 tested

Advanced: 27%
Proficient: 25%
Below the standard: 48%

This school52%

California49%

Alum Rock Union Elementary38%

52% Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8.

Math

Grades 6–8 · spring 2026 · 297 tested

Advanced: 27%
Proficient: 14%
Below the standard: 59%

This school41%

California37%

Alum Rock Union Elementary25%

41% Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8.

Results for each grade, spring 2026English and math · grades 5–8 · every level, with tested counts

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grade 5: share of students tested, spring 2026
Measure	Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced	57%
Advanced	27%
Proficient	30%
Developing level	15%
Minimal	28%
Tested	104
California	49%
Difference	+8

English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
Measure	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced	44%	56%	56%
Advanced	17%	33%	31%
Proficient	27%	23%	25%
Developing level	20%	17%	24%
Minimal	36%	27%	20%
Tested	104	98	95
California	48%	51%	49%
Difference	−4	+5	+7

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grade 5: share of students tested, spring 2026
Measure	Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced	48%
Advanced	28%
Proficient	20%
Developing level	21%
Minimal	31%
Tested	103
California	37%
Difference	+11

Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
Measure	Grade 6	Grade 7	Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced	31%	51%	42%
Advanced	20%	34%	27%
Proficient	11%	17%	15%
Developing level	24%	20%	18%
Minimal	45%	29%	40%
Tested	104	98	95
California	37%	38%	36%
Difference	−6	+13	+6

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →

How do the elementary grades do?

Above California in English; well above it in math. In grade 5, spring 2026, 57% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 48% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.

English

Grade 5 · spring 2026 · 104 tested

Advanced: 27%
Proficient: 30%
Below the standard: 43%

This school57%

California49%

Alum Rock Union Elementary39%

57% Proficient or Advanced in grade 5.

Math

Grade 5 · spring 2026 · 103 tested

Advanced: 28%
Proficient: 20%
Below the standard: 52%

This school48%

California37%

Alum Rock Union Elementary30%

48% Proficient or Advanced in grade 5.

How does math compare with English?

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, math trails English by 11 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 12 points across California. The grades 6–8 cards above give each subject’s share.

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 54% to 52% and math from 39% to 41%.

English · top two levels · grades 6–8

202554%300 tested

→

202652%297 tested

This school

California, same grades49% → 49%2025 → 2026 · 1,266,619 → 1,254,039 tested

Math · top two levels · grades 6–8

202539%300 tested

→

202641%297 tested

This school

California, same grades36% → 37%2025 → 2026 · 1,272,526 → 1,254,800 tested

Each year is a different group of students.

Did students here score above what the state expected?

Below what the state expected, in both subjects. California sets an expected score for each student from that student’s own score the year before. In 2025, students here in grades 5–8 scored −6 points against that expected score in English, which the state calls Moderate. In math, they scored −17 points, which it calls Moderate.

Source

Source: CDE growth model, 2025
Students: students with scores in both years in grades 5–8: 397
Comparison: Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Grades 5–8 · 2025 · 397 students with scores in both years

Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.

−6 pts

English

The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

−17 pts

Math

The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

Ask: What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?

All four levelsThe state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal, with tested counts

Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026
Students	Advanced	Proficient	Developing level	Minimal	Tested
English, grades 6–8 · This school	27%	25%	20%	28%	297
English, grades 6–8 · California	19%	30%	23%	28%	1,254,039
English, grades 6–8 · Alum Rock Union Elementary	13%	25%	23%	39%	2,964
Math, grades 6–8 · This school	27%	14%	21%	38%	297
Math, grades 6–8 · California	21%	16%	23%	40%	1,254,800
Math, grades 6–8 · Alum Rock Union Elementary	14%	11%	21%	54%	2,968
English, grade 5 · This school	27%	30%	15%	28%	104
English, grade 5 · California	23%	26%	20%	31%	410,249
English, grade 5 · Alum Rock Union Elementary	16%	23%	21%	40%	968
Math, grade 5 · This school	28%	20%	21%	31%	103
Math, grade 5 · California	21%	16%	24%	39%	411,080
Math, grade 5 · Alum Rock Union Elementary	17%	13%	23%	47%	970

Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Read English and math separately, then look at progress and the courses students can take.

Each grade’s results: English ↑ · Math ↑

Results since 20187 tested years shown

Chart and table: 2018–2026.

English top two levels, grades 6–8

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%20182022202652%49%

Math top two levels, grades 6–8

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%20182022202641%37%

The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.

In grades 6–8, the share at the state’s top two levels in English went from 55% in 2018 to 52% in 2026. In math, it went from 35% in 2018 to 41% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.

Each year’s results and tested counts

English · top two levels · grades 6–8
Year	This school	California
2018	55% 298 tested	49% 1,391,379 tested
2019	51% 300 tested	50% 1,390,416 tested
2022	68% 306 tested	47% 1,277,584 tested
2023	63% 282 tested	46% 1,267,562 tested
2024	61% 298 tested	46% 1,269,432 tested
2025	54% 300 tested	49% 1,266,619 tested
2026	52% 297 tested	49% 1,254,039 tested

Math · top two levels · grades 6–8
Year	This school	California
2018	35% 298 tested	37% 1,394,516 tested
2019	49% 301 tested	38% 1,394,239 tested
2022	54% 306 tested	31% 1,279,506 tested
2023	53% 282 tested	32% 1,272,024 tested
2024	52% 298 tested	33% 1,277,570 tested
2025	39% 300 tested	36% 1,272,526 tested
2026	41% 297 tested	37% 1,254,800 tested

How the state’s growth measure worksPoints above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 6 points below that expected score, and in math 17 points below it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.

What you can do

Who can act on Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy’s results?

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy’s own board decides its plan.

The state hasn’t placed Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source

What has the state flagged?

The state is giving Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy extra help in 2026, because of results for students with disabilities.

Extra help for Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2026 California School Dashboard. Source

Where is its yearly plan?

What its plan pays for ↓

Alum Rock Union Elementary authorized this charter; its current term ends June 30, 2027.

Authorizer from the California Department of Education’s charter term file; term from its Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source

Life at school

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

9 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26.

State attendance and suspension records, 2025–26

That means they missed 10% or more of school days. At the average middle school in the Alum Rock Union Elementary district, 14 in 100 were. 1.4% of students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school.

Source

Source: CDE chronic absenteeism and suspension files, 2025–26
Students: chronic absence: 36 of 415 students counted for it; suspension: 6 of 417 students enrolled during the year
Comparison: Each comparison is the rate at the average school (our average of school rates), not a pooled rate. Also: suspensions at the average middle school in the Alum Rock Union Elementary district 2.5%.

Chronically absent, 2025–26

9 in 100This school

14 in 100At the average middle school in the Alum Rock Union Elementary district

18 in 100At the average California middle school

36 of 415 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.

Suspensions, 2025–26

1.4%

of students were suspended at least once (6 of 417). Average California middle school 3.7%.

Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?

Chronic absence by grade2025–26 · per 100 students, with counts

Grades 5–6: 7 in 100, 16 of 215
Grades 7–8: 10 in 100, 20 of 200

Ask families and staff yourselfWhat to ask the people at Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy

Ask current families how the school keeps them informed, and what happened when their child needed help. Ask staff how long teachers tend to stay.

Questions for your visit ↓

Have a child here? Answer 7 questions Responder en español

Every learner

How do kids like mine do here?

Four student groups here scored above the same groups across Alum Rock Union Elementary.

Student groups, grades 5–8, spring 2026

48% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 5–8, spring 2026), against 29% for the same group across Alum Rock Union Elementary. Hispanic or Latino and Asian students and English learners also scored above the same groups across Alum Rock Union Elementary; the chart gives their figures. Every group’s math results are in the table below.

Source

Source: California Department of Education, CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students: grades 5–8; each row gives its tested count. Low-income is CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged”.
Comparison: California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s rows for the whole state combined and weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Kipp Prize Preparatory AcademySame group, California

Asian89 tested84%Same group, California 75%
Low-income314 tested48%Same group, California 39%
Hispanic or Latino292 tested42%Same group, California 39%
English learners130 tested12%Same group, California 8%
Students with disabilities59 tested7%Same group, California 15%

Proficient or Advanced, grades 5–8 English, spring 2026. In math the same groups run from 8% to 84%; every value is in the table below.

Who are the students?

2025–26 · students counted

Hispanic or Latino73%
Asian21%
Filipino3%
White—
Black or African American—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Unallocated share3%

A dash means the share isn’t available; it isn’t zero. The unallocated share is what’s left after the shares we have; it isn’t a student group. Source and comparisons: the full student mix below.

Are English learners moving up on the state’s English test?

47% of English learners here moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026.

Spring 2025 to spring 2026 · English learners with state English test (ELPAC) scores in both years

This school · 61 of 129 English learners47%

Alum Rock Union Elementary · 925 of 2,19442%

California · 355,274 of 748,91647%

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.

Who are the families and teachers?

81%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 336 of 416. California: 63%.

19teachers, 2024–25

4 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25

0%in their first year, 2024–25

66%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22

Ask: How does the school keep low-income students and other student groups on track as they move up through the grades?

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Proficient or Advancedgrades 5–8 · spring 2026

Group and subject	Here	vs Alum Rock Union Elementary	vs California
Low-income · 314 tested
English	48%	+1929%	+939%
Math	35%	+1916%	+926%
Hispanic or Latino · 292 tested
English	42%	+1527%	+339%
Math	28%	+1414%	+325%
Asian · 89 tested
English	84%	+2361%	+975%
Math	84%	+3153%	+1470%
English learners · 130 tested
English	12%	+75%	+48%
Math	11%	+74%	+38%
Students with disabilities · 59 tested
English	7%	07%	−815%
Math	8%	+44%	−311%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Alum Rock Union Elementary, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Full student mix, comparisons and sources, 2025–26

Students, 2025–26	Here
Hispanic or Latino	73%
Asian	21%
Filipino	3%
White	—
Black or African American	—
Two or more races	—
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

How the credential rate is counted

CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 66% of teaching positions, 10.4 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 15.9 total position FTE (FTEs as rounded by the source; the share is CDE’s own). This measures positions, not individual teachers.

In its own words

What does Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy’s own plan commit to?

Its 2026–27 plan

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

$5.9 million

planned for 30 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 76% of its $7.8 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 130 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 51% of the money. The plan itself puts 77% of it toward staff.

KIPP teachers: $1.7 million
Special education services: $729,733
Expanded enrichment opportunities: $578,778
27 other actions

Reading, math and catch-up help

1 of the plan’s 30 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.

Reading $79,938

Largest of these

Small group reading focus:$79,938

For high-need students

It plans $2.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $1.5 million and estimates it spent $2.6 million, $1.1 million (78%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $160,487 (3%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Special education services:, which went from $855,300 to $729,733.

Largest cuts

Special education services:−⁠$125,567
Expanded enrichment opportunities:−⁠$101,998
Continuity of Learning:−⁠$67,054

Largest increases

Resources:+⁠$27,070
KIPP teachers:+⁠$25,708

New in the 2026–27 plan

Community Schools Implementation/CCSMs$95,369

What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 6–8 only: 52% in English and 41% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure	2024–25	2025–26	Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1	50%	53%	up 3 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1	38%	43%	up 5 pts
Chronically absentGoal 2	10 in 100	9 in 100	1 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2	1.2%	1.4%	up 0.2 pts

Goal 3 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts

KIPP teachers: · $1,722,944
Special education services: · $729,733
Expanded enrichment opportunities: · $578,778

The full plan3 goals, 21 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($5.9 million).

Where does the money go?

68% to Goal 3. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

fell 25% or more
fell 10–25%
fell 2–10%
within 2%
grew 2–10%
grew 10–25%
grew 25% or more
new or renamed title
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1 · Maintenance of Progress GoalAll students will achieve academically$1.4 million23% of action budgets

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.4 million (−⁠$95,544) · p. 13 ↗

Largest funded actions

Special education services:$729,733action 1.2 · p. 72 ↗
Support for multilingual learners:$250,843action 1.1 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Professional development:$169,799action 1.4 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $139,227 is state funding counted toward those services
Small group reading focus:$79,938action 1.7 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Personalized learning and EdTech:$72,365action 1.3 · p. 72 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

Title III: · action 1.5 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$23,110
Data analysis and visualization: · action 1.6 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$18,180

1 more action is in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 72 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

Special education services:−⁠$125,567$855,300 → $729,733 · p. 72 ↗
Professional development:+⁠$8,375$161,424 → $169,799 · p. 72 ↗
Support for multilingual learners:+⁠$7,398$243,446 → $250,843 · p. 72 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

Small group reading focus: · $75,714 → $79,938 · p. 72 ↗+⁠$4,224
Personalized learning and EdTech: · $71,755 → $72,365 · p. 72 ↗+⁠$609
Title III: · $23,002 → $23,110 · p. 72 ↗+⁠$108
Data analysis and visualization: · $16,671 → $18,180 · p. 72 ↗+⁠$1,508
Title not confirmed · $7,801 · p. 72 ↗not compared

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 13 ↗.

Goal 2All students and families will be engaged with the school community$540,3999% of action budgets

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $519,310 (+⁠$21,088) · p. 24 ↗

Largest funded actions

Improving school climate:$169,890action 2.4 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $39,583 is state funding counted toward those services
Mental health clinician:$156,855action 2.5 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $147,855 is state funding counted toward those services
Community Schools Implementation/CCSMs$95,369action 2.6 · p. 73 ↗
Family involvement and support:$60,532action 2.1 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Improve attendance:$29,229action 2.2 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

Communication resources: · action 2.3 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$28,524

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

Improve attendance:+⁠$12,503$16,726 → $29,229 · p. 73 ↗
Communication resources:+⁠$4,872$23,652 → $28,524 · p. 73 ↗
Family involvement and support:+⁠$3,833$56,699 → $60,532 · p. 73 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

Improving school climate: · $168,792 → $169,890 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$1,097
Mental health clinician: · $159,941 → $156,855 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$3,087
Community Schools Implementation/CCSMs · $95,369 · p. 73 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 10 measures · 1 quoted

Student Suspensions: The percent of students (count) that have been suspended from school p. 26 ↗
Baseline
All students: 1% …
Target for year 3
Maintain LOW on the CA Dashboard, within 0.3% YoY.

9 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3 · Maintenance of Progress GoalAll students will have the spaces, resources and opportunities to achieve$4.1 million68% of action budgets

16 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.1 million (−⁠$86,032) · p. 36 ↗

Largest funded actions

KIPP teachers:$1.7 millionaction 3.8 · p. 73 ↗
Expanded enrichment opportunities:$0.6 millionaction 3.12 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Facilities and emergency procedures:$0.5 millionaction 3.7 · p. 73 ↗
Resources:$0.3 millionaction 3.4 · p. 73 ↗
More teacher time:$0.2 millionaction 3.5 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

11 more funded actions in this goal

Title I and II, improving academic outcomes: · action 3.2 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Custodial and facility staff: · action 3.6 · p. 73 ↗$0.1 million
KIPP Contributions · action 3.13 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Personal learning technology devices: · action 3.9 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Teacher Pathways: · action 3.3 · p. 73 ↗$0.1 million
Arts and Music · action 3.17 · p. 74 ↗$0.1 million
Hiring process: · action 3.1 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Support for new teachers: · action 3.11 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Continuity of Learning: · action 3.14 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Health and safety: · action 3.10 · p. 73 ↗under $0.1 million
Mental Health for All: · action 3.15 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

Expanded enrichment opportunities:−⁠$101,998$680,775 → $578,778 · p. 74 ↗
Continuity of Learning:−⁠$67,054$102,759 → $35,705 · p. 74 ↗
Resources:+⁠$27,070$246,851 → $273,920 · p. 73 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

KIPP teachers: · $1.7 million → $1.7 million · p. 73 ↗+⁠$25,708
Facilities and emergency procedures: · $445,052 → $451,993 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$6,942
More teacher time: · $198,601 → $200,704 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$2,103
Title I and II, improving academic outcomes: · $173,955 → $188,638 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$14,683
Custodial and facility staff: · $132,910 → $125,629 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$7,281
KIPP Contributions · $116,873 → $118,711 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$1,838
Personal learning technology devices: · $86,420 → $84,718 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$1,702
Teacher Pathways: · $79,570 → $82,789 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$3,220
Arts and Music · $69,367 → $71,208 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$1,841
Hiring process: · $51,542 → $57,035 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$5,493
Support for new teachers: · $45,429 → $47,963 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$2,534
Health and safety: · $5,750 → $6,250 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$500
Mental Health for All: · $3,347 → $3,419 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$72

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 36 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Next steps

What comes after Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy, and how do I get in?

No assigned next school.

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy is a charter, so a student’s later schools follow the family’s home address, not this campus, unless the family applies elsewhere. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

Elementary
O. S. Hubbard Elementary
18th · Needs Support · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
Middle · this school
Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy
Grades 5–8
High
Link not recorded
Ask the district about this stage.

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Explore schools on the map

Not a next step: the school sharing this address. KIPP Heartwood Academy (90th percentile, Strong, among middle schools, 2026) has the same street address in the state’s school directory.

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

O. S. Hubbard Elementary
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
18th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
Aptitud Community Academy at Goss
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
15th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
San Antonio Elementary
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
3rd percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

How do I get in?

Ask Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

Before you apply

Confirm this school’s current process directly.

Eligibility and entry grades: Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
Application and lottery: What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?
The daily logistics: What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

School website: kippnorcal.org ↗Office: (408) 251-5600Administrator: Sam Luna

Location and visiting

Get directions

1250 South King Road, San Jose 95122

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm enrollment with the school.

Questions for your visit

What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working? 59% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grades 6–8, spring 2026 (297 students tested); California: 63%
When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
What extra help do English learners get, and how do you know it’s working? 11% of English learners scored Proficient or Advanced in math, grades 5–8, spring 2026 (130 students tested); the same group across California: 8%
Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

Office (408) 251-56001250 South King Road, directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)

Nearby middle schoolsClosest first, by straight-line distance

The closest middle schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby middle schoolsPercentile among California middle schools, 2026

KIPP Heartwood Academy0.0 mi · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
90thStrongScope Score 65
ACE Esperanza MiddleFranklin-McKinley Elementary · 0.7 mi · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
18thNeeds SupportScope Score 25
ACE Empower AcademySanta Clara County Office of Education · 0.8 mi · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
11thNeeds SupportScope Score 22
Renaissance at Mathson0.9 mi
34thDevelopingScope Score 32
Bridges AcademyFranklin-McKinley Elementary · 0.9 mi
9thNeeds SupportScope Score 22

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map

Source records

Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #848 of 2,529 California middle schools we score · #3 of 8 in Alum Rock Union Elementary

Score factors, 2025–26
Factor	School	Index	Weight
Advancedaverage of English and math	27%	60	42%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math	47%	55	23%
8th graders in 2026 against 6th graders in 2024 (partly different children)	+38 scale-score pts	37	20%
Chronically absent	9 in 100	62	5%
Suspension rate	1.4% (6 of 417)	59	5%
English learners: top level	16%	43	5%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2025–26	45	66	#848	California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School year	Chronic absence	Suspension	Grade gap (points)
2018–19	not on file	not on file	+6
2021–22	not on file	not on file	−11
2022–23	not on file	not on file	+17
2023–24	10 in 100	0.2% (1 of 417)	+25
2024–25	10 in 100	1.2% (5 of 422)	−13
2025–26	9 in 100	1.4% (6 of 417)	+11

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 6 and grade 8 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).

No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series

Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Top level	Top two levels
2026 · English	401	27%	53%
2026 · Math	400	27%	43%
2025 · English	406	24%	50%
2025 · Math	406	20%	38%
2024 · English	402	35%	61%
2024 · Math	402	34%	52%
2023 · English	381	32%	64%
2023 · Math	381	32%	50%
2022 · English	408	29%	64%
2022 · Math	408	31%	48%
2019 · English	402	21%	52%
2019 · Math	404	29%	50%
2018 · English	399	25%	57%
2018 · Math	399	20%	41%
2017 · English	296	23%	59%
2017 · Math	296	20%	41%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 5 · English	106	41%
2025 · Grade 6 · English	107	59%
2025 · Grade 7 · English	99	49%
2025 · Grade 8 · English	94	52%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math	106	33%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math	107	50%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math	99	35%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math	94	31%
2024 · Grade 5 · English	104	62%
2024 · Grade 6 · English	101	60%
2024 · Grade 7 · English	100	51%
2024 · Grade 8 · English	97	72%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	104	53%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math	101	41%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math	100	37%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math	97	78%
2023 · Grade 5 · English	99	68%
2023 · Grade 6 · English	98	53%
2023 · Grade 7 · English	93	72%
2023 · Grade 8 · English	91	65%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	99	39%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math	98	35%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math	93	69%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math	91	57%
2022 · Grade 5 · English	102	52%
2022 · Grade 6 · English	107	69%
2022 · Grade 7 · English	104	79%
2022 · Grade 8 · English	95	54%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	102	31%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math	107	56%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math	104	55%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math	95	51%
2019 · Grade 5 · English	102	54%
2019 · Grade 6 · English	101	50%
2019 · Grade 7 · English	99	58%
2019 · Grade 8 · English	100	46%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	103	52%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math	101	38%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math	100	56%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math	100	54%
2018 · Grade 5 · English	101	61%
2018 · Grade 6 · English	104	65%
2018 · Grade 7 · English	100	50%
2018 · Grade 8 · English	94	50%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math	101	57%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math	104	34%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math	100	37%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math	94	34%
2017 · Grade 5 · English	102	60%
2017 · Grade 6 · English	102	65%
2017 · Grade 7 · English	92	52%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math	102	33%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math	102	48%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math	92	41%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026

Science (CAST)	Tested	Advanced	Proficient	Developing level	Minimal
Schoolwide	201	17%	25%	47%	11%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California

Group · English	Tested	Proficient or Advanced	vs district	vs California
Low-income	314	48%	+19	+9
Hispanic or Latino	292	42%	+15	+3
English learners	130	12%	+7	+4

Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score

Group	English	n	CDE category	Math	n	CDE category
All students	−6	397	Moderate	−17	397	Moderate
Low-income	−8	327	Moderate	−19	327	Moderate
Hispanic or Latino	−11	316	Moderate	−24	316	Minimal
English learners	−10	255	Moderate	−16	255	Moderate
Recently reclassified as fluent in English	+12	133	not categorized	−11	133	not categorized
English learners only	−30	122	not categorized	−16	122	not categorized
Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only)	−22	81	Minimal	−11	81	Moderate
Asian	+14	66	Accelerated	+25	66	Exceptional
English-only students	−2	63	not categorized	−13	63	not categorized
Students with disabilities	−17	55	Moderate	−22	55	Minimal

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 5–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure, and grade 8 against the same school’s grade 6 two years earlier, partly different children · two different measures

Grade 8 in 2026 against grade 6 in 2024 · English

English · 2024 · Grade 6

36%

exceeded standard · 60% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2024 · 101 English test records with scores

English · 2026 · Grade 8

31%

Advanced · 56% Proficient or Advanced

CDE CAASPP 2026 · 95 English test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 95 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English−6 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 5–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 5–8

397 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

State model · math−17 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 5–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 5–8

397 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 5–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 10 in 100 → 2025–26 · 9 in 100 · −1 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 1.2% (5 of 422) → 2025–26 · 1.4% (6 of 417) · +0.2 percentage points

Group	2018–19	2025–26	Change
Female	—	11 in 100	—
Male	—	6 in 100	—
Asian	—	0 in 100	—
Filipino	—	0 in 100	—
Hispanic or Latino	—	11 in 100	—
Students with disabilities	—	6 in 100	—
English learners	—	7 in 100	—
Homeless	—	23 in 100	—
Low-income	—	9 in 100	—
All students	—	9 in 100	—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$16,303 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 8,652 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,712 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 62%Instruction support 9%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 9%Other 1%

The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
Group	Dollars	Share, to two decimals	Printed
Instruction	$105,563,142	61.85%	62%
Instruction support	$15,833,290	9.28%	9%
Student services	$20,445,584	11.98%	12%
Administration	$12,421,521	7.28%	7%
Buildings & maintenance	$15,450,333	9.05%	9%
Other	$953,006	0.56%	1%
Total	$170,666,874	100.00%	100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $170,666,874 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$16,303 per pupil

2020$15,527 per pupil

2019$16,178 per pupil

2018$13,726 per pupil

2017$12,634 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders15.6%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 95122 · not the school’s students

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 95122 area
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$103,549
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	19%
ZIP-area population	50,775
Median age	37.0 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95122 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/kipp-prize-preparatory-academy-9924"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyze · Request a correction

Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy — Rating & test scores

Compare schools

Spring 2026 state test results

Common questions

How do I get in?

Is Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy a good middle school?

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

Did students here score above what the state expected?

How do kids like mine do here?

What does its own plan pay for?

What should I ask on a visit?

How did students here do on state tests?

English

Math

How do the elementary grades do?

English

Math

How does math compare with English?

Have results changed?

English · top two levels · grades 6–8

Math · top two levels · grades 6–8

Did students here score above what the state expected?

English

Math

Each year’s results and tested counts

Who can act on Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy’s results?

What has the state flagged?

Where is its yearly plan?

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

Chronically absent, 2025–26

Suspensions, 2025–26

How do kids like mine do here?

Who are the students?

Are English learners moving up on the state’s English test?

Who are the families and teachers?

What does Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy’s own plan commit to?

The 2026–27 plan in short

Where the money goes

Reading, math and catch-up help

For high-need students

What changed

What its goals measure

Where does the money go?

Every goal, in the plan’s order

What comes after Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy, and how do I get in?

Elementary links

How do I get in?

Before you apply

Location and visiting

Questions for your visit

Source records

Scope Score

Grade 8 in 2026 against grade 6 in 2024 · English

Per-pupil spending

Additional workforce records

Embed this scorecard

Did you find what you were looking for?