Math
8%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Public middle school
Bridges Academy
A closer look at learning, opportunity and fit.
21% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 8% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(408) 283-6400
DistrictFranklin-McKinley Elementary
PrincipalMaria Trejo
Grades7-8
Enrollment274 students
English
21%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
274Total enrollment
Chronic absence
—Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 23% | 35% |
| 2022 | 10% | 32% |
| 2023 | 6% | 30% |
| 2024 | 22% | 32% |
| 2025 | 8% | 21% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
2%ProficientStandard Met
6%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
11%MinimalStandard Not Met
81%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
2%ProficientStandard Met
20%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
35%MinimalStandard Not Met
44%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Where its students land
ELA20% met or exceeded
Exceeded 2%Met 18%Nearly Met 33%Not Met 48%
Math9% met or exceeded
Exceeded 2%Met 7%Nearly Met 18%Not Met 73%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California middle schools · average17% exceeded · 40% met or exceeded
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model places it near the 12th percentile of middle schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California middle schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 21st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.21st pctile · −8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −24 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 3rd percentile of 7,518 reported schools.3rd pctile · −24 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Bridges Academy in San Jose, 20.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bridges Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 13.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (8.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (16.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 229 students tested.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 14% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 14%, district —, state 40%14%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 14%, district 29%, state 32%14% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 11%, district 20%, state 32%11% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 13%, district 31%, state 42%13% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 15%, district 33%, state 44%15% · +1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 9%, state 11%3% · −11 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 8%, state 15%5% · −9 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 25%, district 54%, state 72%25% · +10 vs school
6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
Low-income students215 studentsLow-income students, reading: −7 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 215 students.−7 pts · −4 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students172 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 172 students.−8 pts · −6 vs typical
English Learner146 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 146 students.−3 pts · +2 vs typical
English learners only81 studentsEnglish learners only, reading: −6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 81 students.−6 pts · +9 vs typical
Long-term English learners80 studentsLong-term English learners, reading: −6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −7 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 80 students.−6 pts · +1 vs typical
Math
Low-income students213 studentsLow-income students, math: −22 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 213 students.−22 pts · −17 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students170 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −30 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 170 students.−30 pts · −24 vs typical
English Learner144 studentsEnglish Learner, math: −23 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 144 students.−23 pts · −20 vs typical
English learners only80 studentsEnglish learners only, math: −19 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 80 students.−19 pts · −14 vs typical
Long-term English learners80 studentsLong-term English learners, math: −26 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 80 students.−26 pts · −20 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Long-Term English Learners are counted in grades 6-8 only (CDE's own rule), so that row is not comparable to this school's all-students figure. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 20 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher20 · district 23
Teaching staff15 teachers
Avg. experience17.7 years
Fully credentialed83%
First-year teachers7%
PrincipalMaria Trejo
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$63,748 – $126,872
Principal salaryFrom $166,911
Superintendent salary$293,319
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $25,648 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$714 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,648, CA average $14,491$25,648 · spent at this school
Federal share$714 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,871 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 67%Instruction support 11%Student services 7%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 9%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,316 per pupil
2019$14,791 per pupil
2018$14,337 per pupil
2017$10,086 per pupil
2016$9,644 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Four in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 274 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).
On the state's science test (CAST), 7% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino75.9% · district 61.6% · CA 56.1%
White0.7% · district 1.5% · CA 19.9%
Asian16.8% · district 30.8% · CA 10.2%
Black0.7% · district 1.3% · CA 4.8%
Other5.8% · district 4.8% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch89.4% · CA 64%
Median income$104K · CA $85K
Median home value$873K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+19% · CA 35%
ZIP population50,775
Median age37 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridges Academy | Public | Not available | — | — | School being viewed | |
| KIPP Heartwood Academy | Charter | Strong | 44% | 68% | 0.9 mi | |
| KIPP Heritage Academy | Charter | Strong | 37% | 64% | 2.9 mi | |
| Kipp Prize Preparatory Academy | Charter | Solid | 23% | 46% | 0.9 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
19 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Franklin-McKinley Elementary.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Franklin ElementaryPublished boundary overlapScope Score 29/100
Robert F. Kennedy ElementaryPublished boundary overlapScope Score 27/100
McKinley ElementaryPublished boundary overlapScope Score 21/100
Santee ElementaryPublished boundary overlapScope Score 29/100
Shirakawa (George, Sr.) ElementaryPublished boundary overlapScope Score 39/100
Jeanne R. Meadows ElementaryPublished boundary overlap
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
With no score to read, a visit does the heavy lifting: ask about class sizes, teacher tenure, and where last year's students went next.
- Ask about typical class sizes and the student-teacher ratio.
- Ask how long teachers have stayed at the school.
- Ask where recent graduates or transfers went next.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom, and watch how a lesson actually runs.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
A closer look at the evidence
Bridges Academy: reading the evidence
Bridges Academy is a middle school in San Jose. We publish no Scope Score, band or rank for it this year — the composite they are all built from isn't on file. Here's what we can show.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction