KIPP Navigate College Prep: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
KIPP Navigate College Prep posts 44% meeting the standard against 36% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 59 | 26% | 44% | 85.5% | 100.0% | 15.5% | 3.0% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
KIPP Navigate College Prep scores 59 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “44% proficient” and call it done. KIPP Navigate College Prep deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
KIPP Navigate College Prep's low-income kids hit 61.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, KIPP Navigate College Prep enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 82nd-percentile line every tested year since 2022.
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 56% | 43% | 61% | 58% |
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 38% | 27% | 20% | 31% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 44 are proficient by 11th grade → 86 graduate → 100 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
KIPP Navigate College Prep's most underrated number
61.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At KIPP Navigate College Prep in San Jose, 61.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 61.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. KIPP Navigate College Prep outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (53.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 46.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 57 students tested.
5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
The people teaching here
What gets spent here
$537 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
55% of district spending reaches instruction — CA average is 56%.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 297 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is KIPP Navigate College Prep a good high school?
What are KIPP Navigate College Prep's CAASPP test scores?
How does KIPP Navigate College Prep rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at KIPP Navigate College Prep?
How does KIPP Navigate College Prep compare to other schools in San Jose?
How does KIPP Navigate College Prep serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 54
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 74
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 72 | 29% | 29% | 21% | 21% | 58% | +11 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 72 | 22% | 8% | 19% | 50% | 31% | +7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 93 | 10% | 17% | 56% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 57 | 61.4% | +0 | +23 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 54 | 53.7% | +0 | +15 |
| English Learners | 17 | 11.8% | +0 | +1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIPP Navigate College Prep ← | — | 59 | 25.7% | 44.5% | — | 3.0% |
| Evergreen Valley High | 2.2 mi | 72 | 50.5% | 74.9% | — | 1.4% |
| Mt. Pleasant High | 0.1 mi | 46 | 9.6% | 32.0% | — | 3.8% |
| William C. Overfelt High | 1.5 mi | 43 | 10.4% | 30.1% | — | 4.1% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 58 | 82 | #386 | 26.0% | 46.8% | 24.8% | 9.2% | — |
| 2023 | 52 | 73 | #578 | 17.1% | 35.0% | 18.1% | 9.6% | — |
| 2024 | 56 | 79 | #444 | 19.8% | 40.4% | 17.4% | 3.1% | — |
| 2025 | 59 | 82 | #380 | 25.7% | 44.5% | 15.5% | 3.0% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11.1% | 15.5% | +4.4pp |
| Male | 11.5% | 8.9% | -2.6pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 12.5% | 14.9% | +2.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 26.7% | 15.9% | -10.8pp |
| English Learners | 15.6% | 17.9% | +2.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.8% | 12.6% | +1.8pp |
| All Students | 11.3% | 12.1% | +0.8pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction