iHigh Virtual Academy: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
iHigh Virtual Academy posts 50% meeting the standard, and 27.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 28% | 50% | -17.6 | 8.1% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
iHigh Virtual Academy scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 64th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “50% proficient” and call it done. iHigh Virtual Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Diego, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
iHigh Virtual Academy's low-income kids hit 51.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 55th to the 64th percentile since 2022 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 39% | 41% | 54% | 56% |
| Grade 4 | 45% | 40% | 32% | 65% |
| Grade 5 | 53% | 31% | 56% | 45% |
| Grade 6 | 41% | 35% | — | 62% |
| Grade 7 | 45% | 42% | — | — |
| Grade 8 | 50% | 38% | — | — |
| Grade 11 | 62% | 73% | — | — |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | — | 44% | 46% | 42% | 56% |
| Grade 4 | — | 44% | 21% | 30% | 50% |
| Grade 5 | — | 26% | 26% | 44% | 31% |
| Grade 6 | — | 35% | 17% | — | 38% |
| Grade 7 | — | 31% | 26% | — | — |
| Grade 8 | — | 27% | 14% | — | — |
| Grade 11 | 56% | 25% | 23% | — | — |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 12.1pp across grades; the floor slips 10.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
iHigh Virtual Academy's most underrated number
51.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At iHigh Virtual Academy in San Diego, 51.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. iHigh Virtual Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (38.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 8.7 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 83 students tested.
11 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 4.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.6pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,369 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 148 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
On the state's science test (CAST), 28% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is iHigh Virtual Academy a good elementary school?
What are iHigh Virtual Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does iHigh Virtual Academy rank in California?
Is iHigh Virtual Academy getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at iHigh Virtual Academy?
How does iHigh Virtual Academy compare to other schools in San Diego?
How does iHigh Virtual Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 74
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 58
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 27 | 26% | 30% | 22% | 22% | 56% | +12 |
| Grade 4 | 20 | 45% | 20% | 5% | 30% | 65% | +20 |
| Grade 5 | 29 | 14% | 31% | 17% | 38% | 45% | −3 |
| Grade 6 | 26 | 19% | 42% | 19% | 19% | 62% | +15 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 27 | 30% | 26% | 19% | 26% | 56% | +10 |
| Grade 4 | 20 | 35% | 15% | 25% | 25% | 50% | +8 |
| Grade 5 | 29 | 17% | 14% | 28% | 41% | 31% | −4 |
| Grade 6 | 26 | 19% | 19% | 38% | 23% | 38% | +3 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 29 | 7% | 21% | 55% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 83 | 51.8% | +9 | +14 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 49 | 46.9% | +6 | +8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iHigh Virtual Academy ← | — | 48 | 27.8% | 50.3% | −17.6 | 0.3% |
| Torrey Pines Elementary | 2.7 mi | 79 | 61.2% | 82.1% | −6.6 | 0.3% |
| Curie Elementary | 1.2 mi | 72 | 60.1% | 81.8% | −11.8 | 0.9% |
| Mt. Everest Academy | 1.6 mi | 71 | 46.5% | 85.3% | −18.4 | 0.7% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 38 | 55 | #2602 | 21.5% | 41.9% | 51.7% | 0.0% | -2.1pp |
| 2023 | 24 | 11 | #5083 | 13.9% | 34.5% | 78.7% | 0.0% | -15.2pp |
| 2024 | 40 | 46 | #3088 | 17.3% | 42.9% | 40.0% | 0.2% | +2.1pp |
| 2025 | 48 | 64 | #2060 | 27.8% | 50.3% | 8.1% | 0.3% | -17.6pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 56.5% | 6.0% | -50.5pp |
| Male | 47.8% | 6.5% | -41.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 54.2% | 9.0% | -45.2pp |
| Two or More Races | 53.3% | 5.9% | -47.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 54.5% | 6.7% | -47.8pp |
| All Students | 53.6% | 6.2% | -47.4pp |
| Asian | — | 0.0% | — |
| Black/African American | — | 7.7% | — |
| White | — | 0.0% | — |
| Students with Disabilities | — | 3.2% | — |
| English Learners | — | 5.3% | — |
| Homeless | — | 4.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction