Herbert C. Greenhigher than 22 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Herbert C. Greenhigher than 22 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Herbert C. Greenhigher than 22 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well below California in English and math: 35% and 18% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 277 in English, 276 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
This rating covers grades 6–8. Herbert C. Green Middle teaches 5–8: grade 5 results ↓
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
9%
Proficient
18%
Below Proficient
73%
27% proficient or advanced · 66 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Mother Lode Union Elementary
Advanced
9%
21%
10%
Proficient
18%
16%
23%
Developing
34%
24%
31%
Minimal
39%
39%
36%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Read English and math separately, then look at progress and the courses students can take.
Ask: How do students get support, choose courses, and prepare for the move to high school?
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 6–8Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school35%
California49%
Tested: 277 here · 1,254,039 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school35%
Mother Lode Union Elementary35%
Tested: 277 here · 295 in Mother Lode Union Elementary. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 2 schools.
Math
grades 6–8Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school18%
California37%
Tested: 276 here · 1,254,800 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school18%
Mother Lode Union Elementary19%
Tested: 276 here · 293 in Mother Lode Union Elementary. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 2 schools.
English
grade 5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school43%
California49%
Tested: 65 here · 410,249 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school43%
Mother Lode Union Elementary48%
Tested: 65 here · 81 in Mother Lode Union Elementary. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 2 schools.
Math
grade 5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school27%
California37%
Tested: 66 here · 411,080 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school27%
Mother Lode Union Elementary33%
Tested: 66 here · 83 in Mother Lode Union Elementary. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 2 schools.
Progress over time
How are results changing through the middle years?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 6–8 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID35%49%
This schoolCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID18%37%
This schoolCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 51% in 2017 to 35% in 2026. Math went from 47% in 2017 to 18% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2015
47% 348 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
50% 348 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
51% 336 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
49% 345 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
43% 361 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
30% 291 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
30% 280 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
30% 287 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
38% 269 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
35% 277 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2015
45% 349 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
44% 348 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
47% 338 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
41% 347 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
35% 364 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
21% 288 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
24% 279 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
24% 286 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
23% 266 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
18% 276 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure321 students in English, 320 in math · grades 5–8 · 2025
English−6ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math−10ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 6 points below that prediction, and in math 10 points below it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: Math is lower than in 2015 here (45% to 18%), while across California it went from 33% to 37%. How does the school check what’s working in math?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
16 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
18in 100 at the average California middle school
57 of 360 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school16 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
14.9%of students were suspended at least once (54 of 362), 2025–26
3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
14
22 of 156
Grades 7–8
17
35 of 204
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Herbert C. Green works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Herbert C. Green. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 5–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
215 tested per subject
English
27% / 39%
Math
16% / 26%
White
195 English · 194 math tested
English
43% / 62%
Math
26% / 50%
Hispanic or Latino
115 English · 116 math tested
English
29% / 39%
Math
12% / 25%
Students with disabilities
30 tested per subject · grades 6 and 7
English
13% / 14%
Math
10% / 10%
Low-income, White and Hispanic or Latino students did worse than the same groups statewide.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 5–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Mother Lode Union Elementary
vs California
Low-income · 215 tested
English
27%
−229%
−1239%
Math
16%
−218%
−1026%
White · 195 tested in English, 194 in math
English
43%
−144%
−1962%
Math
26%
−329%
−2450%
Hispanic or Latino · 115 tested in English, 116 in math
English
29%
−231%
−1039%
Math
12%
−113%
−1325%
Students with disabilities · 30 tested · grades 6 and 7 only
English
13%
013%
−114%
Math
10%
010%
010%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Mother Lode Union Elementary, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1White58%
2Hispanic or Latino33%
3Two or more races3%
4Asian—
5Black or African American—
6Filipino—
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share6%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
White
58%
Hispanic or Latino
33%
Two or more races
3%
Asian
—
Black or African American
—
Filipino
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
Half students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (50%, 181 of 363). California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
Teachers23
Average experience8 years
First-year teachers9%
63% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 62.77%: 13.4 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 21.4 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
11%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school11%
Mother Lode Union Elementary26%
California47%
3 of 27 English learners here; 18 of 68 in Mother Lode Union Elementary; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
45th percentile · Developing · elementary · 2026
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Herbert C. Green runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.
Ask Mother Lode Union Elementary which school serves your address.
Herbert C. Green Middle is in the 22nd percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 27 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Herbert C. Green Middle was well below California in English and math: 35% and 18% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Herbert C. Green Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 35% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 18% the math standard; 10% and 8% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 277 students were tested in English and 276 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Herbert C. Green Middle rank in California?
Herbert C. Green Middle is in the 22nd percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Needs Support, 2026). Herbert C. Green Middle ranks #1,974 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Herbert C. Green Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Herbert C. Green Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 47th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Herbert C. Green Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 15.8% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 57 chronically absent of 360 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 14.9%; 54 unduplicated suspended students of 362 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Herbert C. Green Middle compare to other schools in Placerville?
Herbert C. Green Middle is in the 22nd percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 363 students. Use the schools in Placerville page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Herbert C. Green Middle?
At Herbert C. Green Middle in Placerville, 27% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 5–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 29% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 2 points below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 16% in math; White students, 43% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 215 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 41 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 40.6% · index 39 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↓ vs CA average · ≈47th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 53 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.2pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 8 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 17.5% · index 26 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 5
65
22%
21%
25%
32%
43%
49%
−6
Grade 6
83
12%
19%
34%
35%
31%
48%
−17
Grade 7
102
10%
25%
23%
42%
35%
51%
−16
Grade 8
92
9%
29%
30%
32%
38%
49%
−11
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 5
66
9%
18%
34%
39%
27%
37%
−10
Grade 6
83
8%
6%
41%
45%
14%
37%
−23
Grade 7
102
6%
14%
29%
51%
20%
38%
−18
Grade 8
91
10%
11%
39%
40%
21%
36%
−15
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
80
35.0%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
82
30.5%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
92
43.5%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
95
37.9%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
81
18.5%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
82
26.8%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
91
20.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
93
22.6%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
81
34.6%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
97
25.8%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
94
43.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
96
21.9%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
81
22.2%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
96
21.9%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
94
36.2%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
96
14.6%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
94
28.7%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
89
38.2%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
88
25.0%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
103
28.2%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
94
18.1%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
88
34.1%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
88
15.9%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
103
22.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
81
40.7%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
89
23.6%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
108
36.1%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
94
28.7%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
81
18.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
89
22.5%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
106
19.8%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
93
21.5%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
102
38.2%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
115
40.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
127
41.7%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
119
47.9%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
103
28.2%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
118
33.9%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
128
35.9%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
118
33.9%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
109
42.2%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
134
48.5%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
108
50.0%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
103
48.5%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
109
20.2%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
133
37.6%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
110
36.4%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
104
49.0%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
132
37.1%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
118
51.7%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
104
52.9%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
114
48.3%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
132
30.3%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
117
50.4%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
106
43.4%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
115
47.0%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
114
61%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
120
52%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
123
52%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
105
47%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
114
31%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
120
38%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
123
46%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
105
50%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
119
34%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
128
54%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
113
45%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
107
40%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
119
25%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
128
48%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
114
46%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
107
40%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
159
9%
23%
51%
16%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
215
27%
−2
−11
White
195
43%
−1
−19
Hispanic/Latino
115
29%
−2
−11
03More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Additional workforce records
Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
13.4%
18.6%
+4.0pp
2022
—
—
—
30.1%
8.6%
+2.1pp
2023
—
—
—
25.5%
6.8%
-10.9pp
2024
—
—
—
21.5%
5.2%
-5.6pp
2025
—
—
—
17.1%
14.2%
+1.6pp
2026
27
22
#1974
15.9%
14.3%
+6.6pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
— Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA in grades 5–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
04Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
12.2%
15.3%
+3.1pp
Male
14.7%
16.3%
+1.6pp
Hispanic/Latino
11.0%
9.3%
-1.7pp
Two or More Races
19.0%
16.7%
-2.3pp
White
14.4%
18.2%
+3.8pp
Students with Disabilities
20.6%
28.1%
+7.5pp
English Learners
5.8%
5.3%
-0.5pp
Homeless
27.3%
15.8%
-11.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
16.0%
19.5%
+3.5pp
All Students
13.5%
15.8%
+2.3pp
American Indian/Alaska Native
14.3%
—
—
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
05California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
−6
321
Moderate
−10
320
Moderate
English Only
−4
255
not categorised
−7
254
not categorised
White
−4
182
Average
−6
181
Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
−9
164
Moderate
−16
163
Moderate
Hispanic or Latino
−10
107
Moderate
−16
107
Moderate
English Learner
−11
56
Moderate
−19
56
Moderate
Students with Disabilities
−10
46
Moderate
−11
47
Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
−11
30
not categorised
−16
30
not categorised
English Learners Only
−13
26
not categorised
−20
26
not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
−9
20
Moderate
−7
20
Moderate
American Indian or Alaska Native
−25
12
Minimal
−7
12
Moderate
Homeless Youth
−11
11
Moderate
—
—
—
Two or More Races
−14
11
Moderate
−8
11
Moderate
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
06Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
4%
exceeded standard · 26% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 97 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
9%
exceeded standard · 38% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 92 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 92 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
321 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: −6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 25th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.25th pctile · −6 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
320 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: −10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 20th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.20th pctile · −10 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
07Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$12,113 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 934 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$582 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 363
Central federal expenditures attributed here$47 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 363
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,337 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 60%Instruction support 11%Student services 9%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 12%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$12,113 per pupil
2020$10,790 per pupil
2019$11,335 per pupil
2018$10,606 per pupil
2017$10,582 per pupil
08ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95667+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95667
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$89,938
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
28.10%
ZCTA population
36,830
Median age
49.1 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95667 →
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/herbert-c-green-middle-5615"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Herbert C. Green Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.