ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Edwin Markham Middle · Placerville

Edwin Markham Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Edwin Markham posts 38% meeting the standard and 11.3% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3943
% Exceeded11%17%
% Met+38%39%
Growth+12.8+1.5
Absence20.8%18.5%
Suspension12.5%3.7%
Scope Score
39
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,243 statewide

Edwin Markham Middle scores 39 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. Edwin Markham deserves a closer read. The school sits in Placerville, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 82nd to the 44th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 38% meet the standard today, versus 53% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 651%44%43%40%33%
Grade 757%58%47%47%54%
Grade 871%55%45%40%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 640%30%22%29%22%
Grade 738%33%25%29%41%
Grade 863%37%39%24%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

26%
67%
Grade 6 · 33% proficient
14%
41%
45%
Grade 7 · 55% proficient
11%
37%
52%
Grade 8 · 48% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 4.2pp across grades; the floor rises 14.7pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.3%
State 16.8%
5.6pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+12.8pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
38.1%
State 39.3%
1.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.8%
State 18.5%
2.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
12.5%
State 3.7%
8.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
22.2%
State 18.0%
4.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Edwin Markham Middle in Placerville, 37.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Edwin Markham Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); White students (53.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 266 students tested.

All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 39%38%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 29%, district 32%, state 32%29% · −9 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 46%, district 47%, state 56%46% · +8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 33%, district 37%, state 42%33% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 43%, district 40%, state 44%43% · +5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 25%, district 25%, state 32%25% · −13 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 9%, state 15%5% · −33 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 7%, district 8%, state 11%7% · −31 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 38%, district 33%, state 56%38% · −1 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 11.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +11.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.8%, district 19.2%, state 18.5%20.8% · +2.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 12.5%, district —, state 3.7%12.5% · +8.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.6%
Grades 7–821.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience13.3 years
Fully credentialed77%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,127 – $111,825
Principal salary$151,844 – $0
Superintendent salary$198,314

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $13,338, CA average $14,815$13,338 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$436 per student

$436 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,885 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,893 per pupil
2019$10,813 per pupil
2018$10,953 per pupil
2017$10,386 per pupil
2016$10,060 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White56.6%
District 55.5% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic33.0%
District 33.4% · CA 56.1%
Other10.0%
District 10.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.2%
District 0.3% · CA 10.2%
Black0.2%
District 0.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 63.3% (0pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$90K · CA $85K
Median home value$548K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+28% · CA 35%
ZIP population36,830
Median age49 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 431 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 34% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Edwin Markham Middle a good middle school?

Edwin Markham Middle has a Scope Score of 39 out of 100, placing it in the 44th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,243 statewide. 11.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.6 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Edwin Markham Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 38.1% of students at Edwin Markham Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 835 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Edwin Markham Middle rank in California?

Edwin Markham Middle ranks #1,243 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 44th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Edwin Markham Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Edwin Markham Middle increases by 12.8 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Edwin Markham Middle?

20.8% of students at Edwin Markham Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 12.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Edwin Markham Middle compare to other schools in Placerville?

Edwin Markham Middle scores 39/100 (44th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 431 students. Use the schools in Placerville page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Edwin Markham Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Edwin Markham Middle in Placerville, 37.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Edwin Markham Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); White students (53.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 266 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
11.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 44th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+12.8pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 55th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
38.1%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.8%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
12.5%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 14th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
22.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61387%26%27%41%33%−14
Grade 714814%41%26%20%54%+6
Grade 813111%37%31%22%47%+1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61389%12%38%41%22%−13
Grade 714811%29%22%38%41%+7
Grade 813216%17%33%34%33%+0
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1113010%24%53%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged26637.2%−1−1
White23653.0%−1−9
Hispanic/Latino13830.4%+1−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Edwin Markham Middle ←3911.3%38.1%+12.812.5%
Herbert C. Green Middle2 mi2610.9%30.4%+1.614.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195682#35520.0%53.4%9.5%5.1%+21.6pp
20224365#75614.7%42.8%33.1%10.1%+9.3pp
20234253#102311.1%36.7%23.8%12.7%+9.4pp
20242928#158810.4%34.8%16.2%10.7%-2.1pp
20253944#124311.3%38.1%20.8%12.5%+12.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.4%19.4%+11.0pp
Male10.8%22.3%+11.5pp
Hispanic/Latino9.8%18.4%+8.6pp
Two or More Races27.6%18.8%-8.8pp
Students with Disabilities18.9%34.5%+15.6pp
English Learners7.9%27.0%+19.1pp
Homeless30.0%20.0%-10.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.9%26.1%+14.2pp
All Students9.5%20.9%+11.4pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction