ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Griffiths (Gordon) Middle · Downey

Griffiths (Gordon) Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Griffiths (Gordon) posts 55% meeting the standard, and 27.0% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

9633 Tweedy Lane, 90240 (opens in new tab)·Downey Unified·Downey·Grades 5-8·1,264 students·77% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 904-3580
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5343
% Exceeded27%17%
% Met+55%39%
Growth-4.0+1.5
Absence15.7%18.5%
Suspension6.0%3.7%
Scope Score
53
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #540 statewide · #1 of 4 in Downey Unified

Griffiths (Gordon) Middle scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 76th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “55% proficient” and call it done. Griffiths (Gordon) deserves a closer read. The school sits in Downey, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Griffiths (Gordon)'s low-income kids hit 55.6% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 67th to the 76th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 55% of students meet the standard today, above the 48% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 655%42%50%62%58%
Grade 747%46%48%56%64%
Grade 859%46%52%47%55%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 640%34%40%53%52%
Grade 743%32%32%40%52%
Grade 845%41%41%38%47%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

25%
33%
42%
Grade 6 · 58% proficient
26%
39%
35%
Grade 7 · 65% proficient
22%
33%
45%
Grade 8 · 55% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.1pp across grades; the floor slips 3.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

55.6%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Griffiths (Gordon)'s most underrated number

55.6% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Griffiths (Gordon) low-income: 55.6%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
27.0%
State 16.8%
10.2pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-4.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
54.9%
State 39.3%
15.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.7%
State 18.5%
2.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
6.0%
State 3.7%
2.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
29.5%
State 18.0%
11.5pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Griffiths (Gordon) Middle in Downey, 55.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 51.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Griffiths (Gordon) Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (46.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (58.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 946 students tested.

All students at this school: 55% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 55%, district —, state 39%55%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 54%, district 48%, state 32%54% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 51%, district 45%, state 32%51% · −4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 52%, district 47%, state 42%52% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 58%, district 50%, state 44%58% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 11%, district 15%, state 15%11% · −43 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 12%, district 18%, state 11%12% · −43 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 53%, state 56%63% · +8 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 25%, district 43%, state 22%25% · −30 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 18%, district 40%, state 26%18% · −37 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 82%, district 72%, state 72%82% · +27 vs school

6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.6pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -3.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.7%, district 21.5%, state 18.5%15.7% · −2.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.0%, district —, state 3.7%6.0% · +2.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.6%
Grades 7–816.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 24:123:1
Teaching staff55 teachers
Avg. experience14.9 years
Fully credentialed85%
Intern / emergency permit1.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,532 – $144,379
Principal salary$164,291 – $187,962
Superintendent salary$357,936

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,897, CA average $14,815$19,897 · spent at this school
Federal share$185 per student

$185 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,955 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction69%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,339 per pupil
2019$13,446 per pupil
2018$13,423 per pupil
2017$12,903 per pupil
2016$12,462 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic88.7%
District 88.6% · CA 56.1%
White5.7%
District 5.2% · CA 19.9%
Black2.1%
District 2.7% · CA 4.8%
Other1.8%
District 1.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.7%
District 1.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 77.0% (13pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$102K · CA $85K
Median home value$816K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+29% · CA 35%
ZIP population24,853
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 42% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Griffiths (Gordon) Middle a good middle school?

Griffiths (Gordon) Middle has a Scope Score of 53 out of 100, placing it in the 76th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #540 statewide. 27.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.2 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Griffiths (Gordon) Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 54.9% of students at Griffiths (Gordon) Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 27.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 27.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 27.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,490 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Griffiths (Gordon) Middle rank in California?

Griffiths (Gordon) Middle ranks #540 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 76th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Griffiths (Gordon) Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Griffiths (Gordon) Middle decreases by 4.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Griffiths (Gordon) Middle?

15.7% of students at Griffiths (Gordon) Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 6.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Griffiths (Gordon) Middle compare to other schools in Downey?

Griffiths (Gordon) Middle scores 53/100 (76th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,264 students. Use the schools in Downey page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Griffiths (Gordon) Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Griffiths (Gordon) Middle in Downey, 55.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 51.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Griffiths (Gordon) Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (46.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (58.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 946 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
27.0%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 61th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-4.0pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
54.9%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 62th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 54th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.0%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 41th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
29.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 61th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 641425%33%23%19%58%+12
Grade 741026%39%17%19%64%+17
Grade 841822%33%18%27%55%+9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 641531%21%23%25%52%+17
Grade 741131%21%21%27%52%+18
Grade 842228%20%22%31%47%+15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1142214%27%49%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged94655.6%+4+17
Hispanic/Latino1,10158.7%+4+20
Students with Disabilities17614.2%−3−3
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Griffiths (Gordon) Middle ←5327.0%54.9%−4.06.0%
Lakeside Middle2.7 mi5322.6%52.5%+2.03.9%
Doty (Wendy Lopour) Middle1.5 mi4818.5%44.6%+8.85.0%
STEAM Academy @ Burke2 mi4716.9%40.7%−1.90.8%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194667#67019.8%48.2%5.8%5.9%+5.2pp
20224160#85916.4%40.1%29.0%7.2%+5.4pp
20234868#70318.7%43.8%21.6%7.2%+1.1pp
20244871#64222.3%49.4%18.0%7.5%-14.9pp
20255376#54027.0%54.9%15.7%6.0%-4.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.1%13.7%+8.6pp
Male6.5%17.5%+11.0pp
Asian0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Black/African American18.8%14.3%-4.5pp
Hispanic/Latino5.5%15.7%+10.2pp
Students with Disabilities12.0%26.7%+14.7pp
English Learners10.8%22.3%+11.5pp
Homeless20.0%25.6%+5.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7.1%17.9%+10.8pp
All Students5.8%15.7%+9.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction