Grand Oaks Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Grand Oaks posts 31% meeting the standard and 10.2% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 10% | 31% | +11.3 | 19.6% | 2.9% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Grand Oaks Elementary scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “31% proficient” and call it done. Grand Oaks deserves a closer read. The school sits in Shasta Lake, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 26th to the 44th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 900 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 31% of students meet the standard today, above the 28% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 28% | 30% | 27% | 28% | 21% |
| Grade 4 | 24% | 41% | 37% | 33% | 38% |
| Grade 5 | 25% | 44% | 61% | 44% | 41% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 28% | 36% | 29% | 36% | 29% |
| Grade 4 | 37% | 27% | 31% | 33% | 25% |
| Grade 5 | 25% | 38% | 44% | 35% | 31% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 10.3pp across grades; the floor rises 19.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Grand Oaks Elementary in Shasta Lake, 35.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grand Oaks Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.6% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 127 students tested.
9 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.7pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (24.0% vs 13.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$634 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grand Oaks Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Grand Oaks Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Grand Oaks Elementary rank in California?
Is Grand Oaks Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Grand Oaks Elementary?
How does Grand Oaks Elementary compare to other schools in Shasta Lake?
How does Grand Oaks Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 32
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 56 | 5% | 16% | 29% | 50% | 21% | −22 |
| Grade 4 | 40 | 13% | 25% | 15% | 48% | 38% | −7 |
| Grade 5 | 51 | 16% | 25% | 22% | 37% | 41% | −7 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 56 | 9% | 20% | 25% | 46% | 29% | −17 |
| Grade 4 | 40 | 5% | 20% | 35% | 40% | 25% | −17 |
| Grade 5 | 51 | 14% | 18% | 31% | 37% | 31% | −4 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 51 | 4% | 22% | 61% | 14% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 127 | 35.4% | −1 | −3 |
| White | 96 | 29.2% | −10 | −33 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Oaks Elementary ← | — | 40 | 10.2% | 30.8% | +11.3 | 2.9% |
| Shasta Lake | 0.8 mi | 43 | 14.1% | 37.0% | +2.5 | 7.3% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 33 | 26 | #4095 | 8.6% | 27.7% | 15.4% | 1.1% | -2.8pp |
| 2022 | 32 | 39 | #3496 | 17.1% | 36.0% | 54.2% | 7.4% | +8.2pp |
| 2023 | 45 | 65 | #2012 | 13.9% | 38.1% | 32.5% | 5.3% | +24.3pp |
| 2024 | 39 | 44 | #3226 | 13.2% | 34.6% | 18.4% | 3.1% | +7.5pp |
| 2025 | 40 | 44 | #3224 | 10.2% | 30.8% | 19.6% | 2.9% | +11.3pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 16.2% | 20.6% | +4.4pp |
| Male | 15.1% | 19.2% | +4.1pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.4% | 24.1% | +12.7pp |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 6.3% | 18.2% | +11.9pp |
| Two or More Races | 11.1% | 10.3% | -0.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 20.0% | 17.7% | -2.3pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17.0% | 22.8% | +5.8pp |
| All Students | 15.6% | 19.8% | +4.2pp |
| Foster Youth | — | 13.3% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction