ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate · Santa Ana

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate posts 40% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

2000 North Bristol, 92706 (opens in new tab)·Santa Ana Unified·Santa Ana·Grades 6-8·1,234 students·92% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 972-7800
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4843
% Exceeded15%17%
% Met+40%39%
Growth+4.0+1.5
Absence9.3%18.5%
Suspension3.9%3.7%
Scope Score
48
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #744 statewide · #3 of 16 in Santa Ana Unified

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 67th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Santa Ana, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 9.3% chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 67th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 40% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 639%29%26%37%42%
Grade 746%40%42%39%42%
Grade 843%44%43%42%40%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 632%21%28%28%35%
Grade 736%27%34%35%35%
Grade 845%37%39%44%45%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

10%
32%
58%
Grade 6 · 42% proficient
10%
32%
58%
Grade 7 · 42% proficient
13%
27%
60%
Grade 8 · 40% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.3pp across grades; the floor slips 1.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
15.2%
State 16.8%
1.6pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+4.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
39.8%
State 39.3%
0.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
9.3%
State 18.5%
9.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.9%
State 3.7%
0.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
19.7%
State 18.0%
1.7pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate in Santa Ana, 39.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,110 students tested.

All students at this school: 40% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 40%, district —, state 39%40%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 39%, district 26%, state 32%39% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 38%, district 26%, state 32%38% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 28%, state 44%41% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 38%, district 27%, state 42%38% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 6%, state 11%5% · −35 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 42%, district 21%, state 22%42% · +2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 7%, state 15%10% · −30 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 24%, district 27%, state 46%24% · −16 vs school
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.3%, district 18.6%, state 18.5%9.3% · −9.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.9%, district —, state 3.7%3.9% · +0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.6%
Grades 7–89.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
John Muir Fundamental Elementa…
50/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Wilson Elementary
47/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Adams Elementary
46/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Greenville Fundamental Element…
46/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Andrew Jackson Elementary
43/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Fremont Elementary
42/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Monte Vista Elementary
40/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
George Washington Carver Eleme…
40/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Jefferson Elementary
38/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Jim Thorpe Fundamental
37/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
John F. Kennedy Elementary
37/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Martin Elementary
37/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Madison Elementary
36/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Martin Luther King Jr. Element…
35/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Diamond Elementary
35/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Heroes Elementary
35/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Washington Elementary
35/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Roosevelt Walker Academy
34/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Carl Harvey Elementary
33/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Garfield Elementary
33/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Abraham Lincoln Elementary
33/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Thomas A. Edison Elementary
31/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Lowell Elementary
30/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Wallace R. Davis Elementary
28/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Monroe Elementary
27/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Taft Elementary
24/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Franklin Elementary
21/100
100% of this boundary feeds here
Middle
Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Funda…
48/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 21:122:1
Teaching staff70 teachers
Avg. experience15.0 years
Fully credentialed83%
First-year teachers1%
Intern / emergency permit1.2%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,919 – $138,788
Principal salary$185,651 – $212,659
Superintendent salary$375,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,596, CA average $14,815$26,596 · spent at this school
Federal share$320 per student

$320 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,941 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support14%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,998 per pupil
2019$15,219 per pupil
2018$14,679 per pupil
2017$12,971 per pupil
2016$12,258 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic98.6%
District 95.9% · CA 56.1%
Asian1.0%
District 1.8% · CA 10.2%
Other0.3%
District 1.1% · CA 9.0%
White0.1%
District 0.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 91.7% (28pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$894K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+23% · CA 35%
ZIP population37,175
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 16% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate a good middle school?

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100, placing it in the 67th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #744 statewide. 15.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 39.8% of students at Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 15.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 15.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,405 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate rank in California?

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate ranks #744 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 67th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate increases by 4.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate?

9.3% of students at Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate compare to other schools in Santa Ana?

Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate scores 48/100 (67th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,234 students. Use the schools in Santa Ana page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate in Santa Ana, 39.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,110 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
15.2%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 48th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+4.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 64th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
39.8%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 50th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
9.3%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 63th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 49th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
19.7%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 48th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 641810%32%32%26%42%−4
Grade 740910%32%32%26%42%−6
Grade 837513%27%29%31%40%−6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 641814%21%35%30%35%−0
Grade 741016%19%34%31%35%+1
Grade 837528%17%22%33%45%+13
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/113762%14%63%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1,11039.4%+8+1
Hispanic/Latino1,18641.1%+9+2
English Learners2644.9%−2−5
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental Intermediate ←4815.2%39.8%+4.03.9%
Vista Heritage Global Academy1.4 mi327.5%22.8%−0.30.4%
Julia C. Lathrop Intermediate2.2 mi275.3%15.7%+7.16.0%
Raymond A. Villa Fundamental Intermediate2.5 mi274.7%22.0%−3.67.1%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194564#72314.5%40.5%1.5%2.5%+8.4pp
20224467#72510.8%33.0%20.8%6.2%+15.3pp
20234868#70811.8%35.4%12.7%6.0%+13.3pp
20245075#54713.5%37.4%9.6%4.4%+10.8pp
20254867#74415.2%39.8%9.3%3.9%+4.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female1.5%8.8%+7.3pp
Male1.5%9.6%+8.1pp
Hispanic/Latino1.5%9.1%+7.6pp
Students with Disabilities3.3%18.2%+14.9pp
English Learners1.7%10.0%+8.3pp
Homeless1.1%13.5%+12.4pp
Military-Connected0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1.5%9.8%+8.3pp
All Students1.5%9.2%+7.7pp
Asian8.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction