Glen Park Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Glen Park posts 40% meeting the standard and 22.8% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 23% | 40% | +3.7 | 32.4% | 0.2% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Glen Park Elementary scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 43rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Glen Park deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Francisco, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 26th to the 43rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 700 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 40% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 39% | 46% | 38% | 43% | 34% |
| Grade 4 | 48% | 36% | 36% | 28% | 52% |
| Grade 5 | 29% | 42% | 45% | 39% | 43% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42% | 44% | 36% | 64% | 33% |
| Grade 4 | 42% | 35% | 40% | 32% | 48% |
| Grade 5 | 24% | 32% | 32% | 30% | 32% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.6pp across grades; the floor rises 8.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Glen Park Elementary in San Francisco, 20.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Glen Park Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 18.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (15.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 72 students tested.
5 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (43.8% vs 27.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$278 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 36% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Glen Park Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Glen Park Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Glen Park Elementary rank in California?
Is Glen Park Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Glen Park Elementary?
How does Glen Park Elementary compare to other schools in San Francisco?
How does Glen Park Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 79
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53 | 23% | 11% | 17% | 49% | 34% | −9 |
| Grade 4 | 46 | 26% | 26% | 17% | 30% | 52% | +7 |
| Grade 5 | 42 | 26% | 17% | 12% | 45% | 43% | −5 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 60 | 20% | 13% | 12% | 55% | 33% | −12 |
| Grade 4 | 46 | 24% | 24% | 20% | 33% | 48% | +6 |
| Grade 5 | 44 | 18% | 14% | 14% | 55% | 32% | −3 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 44 | 20% | 16% | 30% | 34% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 72 | 20.8% | −18 | −17 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 68 | 17.6% | −8 | −21 |
| English Learners | 34 | 0.0% | −7 | −10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Park Elementary ← | — | 40 | 22.8% | 40.3% | +3.7 | 0.2% |
| Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila | 2.5 mi | 88 | 59.2% | 81.0% | +25.6 | 0.1% |
| Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | 2.6 mi | 80 | 55.5% | 81.7% | +2.6 | 0.1% |
| Clarendon Alternative Elementary | 1.8 mi | 70 | 48.7% | 71.9% | −2.3 | 0.5% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 33 | 26 | #4048 | 17.0% | 37.5% | 23.5% | 1.6% | -14.1pp |
| 2022 | 35 | 47 | #3050 | 18.3% | 39.0% | 44.6% | 1.8% | -8.0pp |
| 2023 | 39 | 51 | #2831 | 17.9% | 37.9% | 38.5% | 1.2% | +1.5pp |
| 2024 | 36 | 33 | #3822 | 17.8% | 39.3% | 27.4% | 0.2% | -19.0pp |
| 2025 | 40 | 43 | #3301 | 22.8% | 40.3% | 32.4% | 0.2% | +3.7pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 17 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 21.3% | 36.4% | +15.1pp |
| Male | 26.6% | 31.6% | +5.0pp |
| Asian | 6.3% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 43.2% | 60.9% | +17.7pp |
| Filipino | 27.8% | — | — |
| White | 38.5% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 29.5% | 41.3% | +11.8pp |
| Two or More Races | 13.6% | 22.2% | +8.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 36.4% | 40.2% | +3.8pp |
| English Learners | 28.7% | 41.8% | +13.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 28.7% | 46.3% | +17.6pp |
| All Students | 23.9% | 33.9% | +10.0pp |
| Homeless | — | 41.7% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction