George B. Miller Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
George B. Miller posts 60% meeting the standard, and 32.3% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 56 | 32% | 60% | +1.6 | 8.6% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
George B. Miller Elementary scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 77th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “60% proficient” and call it done. George B. Miller deserves a closer read. The school sits in La Palma, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
George B. Miller's low-income kids hit 49.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Slipped from the 96th to the 77th percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 60% meet the standard today, versus 78% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 81% | 58% | 59% | 65% | 58% |
| Grade 4 | 69% | 55% | 62% | 57% | 62% |
| Grade 5 | 79% | 66% | 62% | 64% | 67% |
| Grade 6 | 70% | 77% | 72% | 70% | 71% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 85% | 64% | 67% | 76% | 59% |
| Grade 4 | 79% | 63% | 57% | 61% | 58% |
| Grade 5 | 76% | 48% | 46% | 50% | 54% |
| Grade 6 | 57% | 62% | 65% | 62% | 59% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 8.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
George B. Miller's most underrated number
49.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At George B. Miller Elementary in La Palma, 49.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George B. Miller Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (51.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.6 percentage points for white students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 87 students tested.
5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 20.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +1.7pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (13.5% vs 5.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$609 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is George B. Miller Elementary a good elementary school?
What are George B. Miller Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does George B. Miller Elementary rank in California?
Is George B. Miller Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at George B. Miller Elementary?
How does George B. Miller Elementary compare to other schools in La Palma?
How does George B. Miller Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 82
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 44
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 82
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 32% | 26% | 20% | 22% | 58% | +15 |
| Grade 4 | 55 | 44% | 18% | 13% | 25% | 62% | +17 |
| Grade 5 | 72 | 33% | 33% | 10% | 24% | 67% | +19 |
| Grade 6 | 68 | 34% | 37% | 15% | 15% | 71% | +24 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 19% | 41% | 23% | 18% | 59% | +14 |
| Grade 4 | 55 | 29% | 29% | 25% | 16% | 58% | +17 |
| Grade 5 | 72 | 36% | 18% | 21% | 25% | 54% | +19 |
| Grade 6 | 68 | 29% | 29% | 19% | 22% | 59% | +24 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 72 | 25% | 31% | 39% | 6% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 87 | 49.4% | +7 | +11 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 104 | 51.0% | +8 | +12 |
| Asian | 80 | 83.7% | +2 | +9 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George B. Miller Elementary ← | — | 56 | 32.3% | 59.7% | +1.6 | 0.3% |
| Margaret Landell Elementary | 2.3 mi | 83 | 66.2% | 85.7% | +0.2 | 0.1% |
| Leal (Frank C.) Elementary | 1.6 mi | 82 | 64.2% | 85.4% | −1.6 | 0.2% |
| Cerritos Elementary | 1.2 mi | 80 | 58.5% | 80.1% | −9.1 | 0.3% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 78 | 96 | #238 | 56.3% | 78.3% | 3.7% | 0.0% | -5.9pp |
| 2022 | 58 | 85 | #840 | 35.3% | 59.1% | 16.9% | 0.2% | -4.3pp |
| 2023 | 49 | 71 | #1645 | 33.0% | 58.8% | 21.1% | 0.9% | -9.1pp |
| 2024 | 60 | 82 | #1021 | 37.1% | 61.9% | 10.5% | 0.5% | -13.6pp |
| 2025 | 56 | 77 | #1321 | 32.3% | 59.7% | 8.6% | 0.3% | +1.6pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2.7% | 6.7% | +4.0pp |
| Male | 4.6% | 9.0% | +4.4pp |
| Asian | 0.5% | 1.4% | +0.9pp |
| Black/African American | 5.3% | 0.0% | -5.3pp |
| White | 0.0% | 5.9% | +5.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 7.1% | 15.3% | +8.2pp |
| Two or More Races | 5.9% | 3.6% | -2.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 10.3% | 13.3% | +3.0pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | 6.4% | +6.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 5.0% | 12.2% | +7.2pp |
| All Students | 3.6% | 7.9% | +4.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 0.0% | — |
| Homeless | — | 14.3% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction