School district · Orange County

Centralia Elementary schools

Centralia Elementary runs schools through 6th grade. Its 8 public elementary schools run from the 28th to the 98th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). Middle and high school are run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 8 schools

from 28th to 98th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Los Coyotes Elementary: 98th percentile, Strong
  • Buena Terra Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Glen H. Dysinger Sr. Elementary: 75th percentile, Strong
  • Danbrook Elementary: 73rd percentile, Solid
  • Raymond Temple Elementary: 67th percentile, Solid
  • George B. Miller Elementary: 65th percentile, Solid
  • San Marino Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Centralia Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
2Developing
3Solid
3Strong

One dot per school.

Schools around the Centralia Elementary district

8 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Centralia Elementary district score highest?

Los Coyotes Elementary is highest, at the 98th percentile.

That’s higher than 98 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Centralia Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 5 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the Centralia Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

The district

Where does Centralia Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Centralia Elementary district spent $18,048 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 58 cents of every Centralia Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction58%
  • Instruction support14%
  • Student services11%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance11%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$14.5 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 30 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 17% of its $85.8 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 142 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 31% of the money; their titles are below. The plan itself puts 82% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

4 of the plan’s 30 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $1.0 million
  • English learners $1.0 million

Largest of these

  • Dual Language Immersion (DLI)$775,658
  • Instructional Intervention Programs$538,705
  • Social Worker/ MTSS Counselor (Foster Youth, Homeless, & English Learners)$496,151
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $13.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $10.9 million and estimates it spent $12.2 million, $1.3 million (12%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $3.2 million (28%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Reduce Class Size, which went from $1.0 million to $2.3 million.

Largest increases

  • Reduce Class Size+⁠$1.3 million
  • Transitional Kindergarten (TK) Aide+⁠$271,848
  • Dual Language Immersion (DLI)+⁠$239,749

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Multilingual/ EL Programs, Learning Center Model (English Learners, Low-Income, & Foster Youth)$1.1 million
  • Instructional Intervention Programs$538,705
  • Social Worker/ MTSS Counselor (Foster Youth, Homeless, & English Learners)$496,151
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 2 · Pupil Outcomes58%57%down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 2 · Pupil Outcomes56%58%up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 3 · Engagement12 in 10010 in 1002 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 3 · Engagement0.4%0.2%down 0.2 pts

Goal 1 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Reduce Class Size · $2,298,189
  • Additional Certificated Teachers · $1,164,459
  • Multilingual/ EL Programs, Learning Center Model (English Learners, Low-Income, & Foster Youth) · $1,053,461
The full plan3 goals, 18 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($14.5 million).

Where does the money go?

50% to Goal 2, Pupil Outcomes. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Conditions for Learning$4.6 million32% of action budgets

“Align student learning to state-adopted standards supported by appropriately prepared teachers, materials, instruction, and technology in a safe and clean environment to promote exemplary teaching and learning” p. 22 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.8 million (+⁠$727,031)

Largest funded actions

  1. Access to Resources$1.0 millionaction 1.1 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Supplemental Programs$0.6 millionaction 1.6 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Collaboration & Professional Development$0.6 millionaction 1.7 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $10,000 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Tech Support Specialists & Clerical Specialists I$0.6 millionaction 1.2 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Safety$0.6 millionaction 1.9 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Instructional Intervention Programs · action 1.5 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $21,655 is state funding counted toward those services$0.5 million
  • Curriculum and Instruction Support and Resources · action 1.4 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Textbooks, Materials, Resources (Supplemental) · action 1.3 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • STEAM, Innovative Learning, & Signature Practices · action 1.10 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Teacher Assistance Program (TAP) · action 1.8 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Collaboration & Professional Development+⁠$109,402$462,984 → $572,386 · p. 99 ↗
  2. Tech Support Specialists & Clerical Specialists I+⁠$44,157$518,793 → $562,950 · p. 99 ↗
  3. Safety+⁠$30,366$530,250 → $560,616 · p. 99 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Access to Resources · $1.0 million → $1.0 million · p. 99 ↗+⁠$12,885
  • Supplemental Programs · $595,632 → $586,975 · p. 99 ↗−⁠$8,657
  • Instructional Intervention Programs · $538,705 · p. 99 ↗new or renamed
  • Curriculum and Instruction Support and Resources · $415,342 → $436,849 · p. 99 ↗+⁠$21,507
  • Textbooks, Materials, Resources (Supplemental) · $221,259 → $247,455 · p. 99 ↗+⁠$26,196
  • STEAM, Innovative Learning, & Signature Practices · $50,000 → $47,470 · p. 100 ↗−⁠$2,530
  • Teacher Assistance Program (TAP) · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 99 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 22 ↗.

Goal 2Pupil Outcomes$7.3 million50% of action budgets

“Ensure all students, including English Learners (ELs) and other identified sub-groups demonstrate academic growth and proficiency to leave each grade meeting or exceeding standards to prepare all students for their journey toward college and career readiness” p. 34 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.1 million (+⁠$2.2 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Reduce Class Size$2.3 millionaction 2.1 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Additional Certificated Teachers$1.2 millionaction 2.8 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Multilingual/ EL Programs, Learning Center Model (English Learners, Low-Income, & Foster Youth)$1.1 millionaction 2.5 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Transitional Kindergarten (TK) Aide$0.9 millionaction 2.9 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Dual Language Immersion (DLI)$0.8 millionaction 2.6 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Instructional Aides (IA) · action 2.10 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Information Access Support · action 2.3 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Data Analysis Programs · action 2.4 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) · action 2.2 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Universal Preschool/​Expanded Transitional Kindergarten (TK) · action 2.7 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Reduce Class Size+⁠$1.3 million$1.0 million → $2.3 million · p. 100 ↗
  2. Transitional Kindergarten (TK) Aide+⁠$271,848$612,139 → $883,987 · p. 100 ↗
  3. Dual Language Immersion (DLI)+⁠$239,749$535,909 → $775,658 · p. 100 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Additional Certificated Teachers · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 100 ↗−⁠$11,029
  • Multilingual/ EL Programs, Learning Center Model (English Learners, Low-Income, & Foster Youth) · $1.1 million · p. 100 ↗new or renamed
  • Instructional Aides (IA) · $294,915 → $453,868 · p. 100 ↗+⁠$158,953
  • Information Access Support · $391,071 → $433,176 · p. 100 ↗+⁠$42,105
  • Data Analysis Programs · $170,000 → $212,340 · p. 100 ↗+⁠$42,340
  • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) · $10,479 → $10,155 · p. 100 ↗−⁠$324
  • Universal Preschool/​Expanded Transitional Kindergarten (TK) · $1,000 → $1,000 · p. 100 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 34 ↗.

Goal 3Engagement$2.6 million18% of action budgets

“Engage parents, staff, and community to promote meaningful educational opportunities for all students within a warm, caring, inspirational environment” p. 45 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.4 million (+⁠$285,321)

Largest funded actions

  1. PBIS & Restorative Practices$547,239action 3.5 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Social Worker/ MTSS Counselor (Foster Youth, Homeless, & English Learners)$496,151action 3.2 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Attendance Support/​Clerical Specialists I$430,759action 3.3 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Health Clerks$386,214action 3.4 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Data Analysis Support$232,815action 3.7 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Parent Support Services Translators (English Learners) · action 3.8 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$183,523
  • Communication Specialist · action 3.10 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$139,210
  • Parent Engagement & Community · action 3.1 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$116,322
  • District Front Office Support · action 3.9 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$115,733
  • Second Step · action 3.6 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. PBIS & Restorative Practices+⁠$178,202$369,037 → $547,239 · p. 101 ↗
  2. Attendance Support/​Clerical Specialists I+⁠$74,438$356,321 → $430,759 · p. 101 ↗
  3. Health Clerks+⁠$17,557$368,657 → $386,214 · p. 101 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Social Worker/ MTSS Counselor (Foster Youth, Homeless, & English Learners) · $496,151 · p. 101 ↗new or renamed
  • Data Analysis Support · $235,293 → $232,815 · p. 101 ↗−⁠$2,478
  • Parent Support Services Translators (English Learners) · $180,611 → $183,523 · p. 101 ↗+⁠$2,912
  • Communication Specialist · $129,567 → $139,210 · p. 101 ↗+⁠$9,643
  • Parent Engagement & Community · $132,432 → $116,322 · p. 101 ↗−⁠$16,110
  • District Front Office Support · $108,466 → $115,733 · p. 101 ↗+⁠$7,267
  • Second Step · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 101 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 7 measures · 2 quoted

  • Suspension Rate Local Data p. 48 ↗
    Baseline
    0.36% (three-year average)
    Target for year 3
    Maintain low suspension rate 1%
  • Expulsion Rate Local Data p. 49 ↗
    Baseline
    0% in 2023 - 2024
    Target for year 3
    Maintain low expulsion rate 1% or below

5 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 3,995 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 53%2. Asian: 19%3. White: 11%4. Filipino: 8%5. Two or more races: 5%6. Not reported: 2%7. Black or African American: 2%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino53%
  2. Asian19%
  3. White11%
  4. Filipino8%
  5. Two or more races5%
  6. Not reported2%
  7. Black or African American2%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

67%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 2,654 of 3,990 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Centralia Elementary isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 52% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (324 of 627 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (6)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Centralia Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Los Coyotes Elementary, 98th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California elementary schools we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Centralia Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Centralia Elementary district good?

Centralia Elementary’s 8 public elementary schools run from the 28th to the 98th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Strong, 3 Solid and 2 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Centralia Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Centralia Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Centralia Elementary district spend per student?

The Centralia Elementary district spent $18,048 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 58 cents of every Centralia Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Centralia Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $14.5 million into 30 funded actions in 3 goals, 17% of its $85.8 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $7.3 million, 50% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Centralia Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.