Math
31%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Public elementary school
Frazier Park Elementary
A closer look at learning, opportunity and fit.
33% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 31% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
33%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
234Total enrollment
Chronic absence
—Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 38% | 38% |
| 2022 | 26% | 24% |
| 2023 | 34% | 22% |
| 2024 | 33% | 15% |
| 2025 | 31% | 33% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
18%ProficientStandard Met
13%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
15%MinimalStandard Not Met
54%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
18%ProficientStandard Met
15%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
21%MinimalStandard Not Met
46%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Where its students land
ELA30% met or exceeded
Exceeded 13%Met 17%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 43%
Math33% met or exceeded
Exceeded 11%Met 22%Nearly Met 29%Not Met 38%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model places it near the 79th percentile of elementary schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well above the middle of California elementary schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 79th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.79th pctile · +10 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +11 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 78th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.78th pctile · +11 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Frazier Park Elementary in Frazier Park, 27.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Frazier Park Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 9.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.6% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 8.0 percentage points for homeless students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 76 students tested.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 43%32%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 30%, state 32%30% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 27%, district 34%, state 44%27% · −4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 29%, district 34%, state 56%29% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 38%, district 32%, state 42%38% · +6 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 35%, district 30%, state 32%35% · +3 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 28%, district 26%, state 22%28% · −4 vs school
8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
Low-income students39 studentsLow-income students, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 39 students.+9 pts · +9 vs typical
English Only36 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 36 students.+12 pts · +9 vs typical
Math
Low-income students39 studentsLow-income students, math: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 39 students.+11 pts · +12 vs typical
English Only36 studentsEnglish Only, math: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 36 students.+8 pts · +7 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 18 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher18 · district 20
Teaching staff16 teachers
Avg. experience17.1 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers13%
PrincipalMichael McNelis
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$54,019 – $103,791
Principal salary$126,492 – $136,032
Superintendent salary$184,160
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $21,529 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$1,455 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,529, CA average $14,491$21,529 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,455 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,658 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 50%Instruction support 7%Student services 14%Administration 10%Buildings & maintenance 13%Other 5%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,205 per pupil
2019$12,034 per pupil
2018$12,635 per pupil
2017$11,846 per pupil
2016$10,791 per pupil
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Four in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 234 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
Hispanic or Latino42.3% · district 47.6% · CA 56.1%
White48.3% · district 41.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian1.7% · district 1.6% · CA 10.2%
Black0.8% · district 0.9% · CA 4.8%
Other6.8% · district 8.0% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch84.6% · CA 64%
Median home value$423K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+33% · CA 35%
ZIP population834
Median age44 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frazier Park Elementary | Public | Not available | — | — | School being viewed |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Private school options within 10 miles.
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with El Tejon Unified.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
The road from this school ends at Frazier Mountain High, which sent 6 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 3 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Frazier Mountain High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 36% of Frazier Mountain High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
6 UC enrollees (fall 2024) · 3 AP subjects taught → full record on Frazier Mountain High's page
Source: UC & College Board
Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
With no score to read, a visit does the heavy lifting: ask about class sizes, teacher tenure, and where last year's students went next.
- Ask about typical class sizes and the student-teacher ratio.
- Ask how long teachers have stayed at the school.
- Ask where recent graduates or transfers went next.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom, and watch how a lesson actually runs.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
A closer look at the evidence
Frazier Park Elementary: reading the evidence
Frazier Park is an elementary school in Frazier Park. We publish no Scope Score, band or rank for it this year — the composite they are all built from isn't on file. Here's what we can show.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction