ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Firebaugh Middle · Firebaugh

Firebaugh Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Firebaugh posts 21% meeting the standard and 6.1% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1600 16th Street, 93622 (opens in new tab)·Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified·Firebaugh·Grades 6-8·503 students·86% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(559) 659-1481·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3743
% Exceeded6%17%
% Met+21%39%
Growth+5.3+1.5
Absence9.7%18.5%
Suspension4.1%3.7%
Scope Score
37
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,346 statewide

Firebaugh Middle scores 37 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 40th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “21% proficient” and call it done. Firebaugh deserves a closer read. The school sits in Firebaugh, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 9.7% chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 69th to the 40th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 21% meet the standard today, versus 42% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 646%22%22%18%23%
Grade 754%36%40%29%28%
Grade 856%42%46%37%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 622%14%6%10%14%
Grade 727%14%14%12%13%
Grade 847%12%14%14%18%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
15%
77%
Grade 6 · 23% proficient
22%
71%
Grade 7 · 29% proficient
26%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.6pp across grades; the floor rises 7.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.1%
State 16.8%
10.7pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+5.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
21.2%
State 39.3%
18.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
9.7%
State 18.5%
8.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.1%
State 3.7%
0.4pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
24.1%
State 18.0%
6.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Firebaugh Middle in Firebaugh, 25.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Firebaugh Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (27.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 424 students tested.

All students at this school: 21% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 21%, district —, state 39%21%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 26%, state 32%21% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 24%, state 32%20% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 24%, district 28%, state 44%24% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 19%, district 24%, state 42%19% · −3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 7%, state 11%2% · −19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 9%, state 15%8% · −14 vs school

6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.6pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.7%, district 10.2%, state 18.5%9.7% · −8.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.1%, district —, state 3.7%4.1% · +0.4pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (11.3% vs 5.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.4%
Grades 7–811.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 21:119:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience10.9 years
Fully credentialed73%
First-year teachers7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,570 – $118,888
Principal salary$128,215 – $143,829
Superintendent salary$222,001

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,654, CA average $14,815$20,654 · spent at this school
Federal share$816 per student

$816 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,442 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction53%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance16%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,063 per pupil
2019$14,021 per pupil
2018$14,738 per pupil
2017$13,865 per pupil
2016$13,589 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic97.2%
District 97.1% · CA 56.1%
White2.2%
District 2.2% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.2%
District 0.2% · CA 10.2%
Black0.2%
District 0.3% · CA 4.8%
Other0.2%
District 0.2% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 85.9% (22pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$48K · CA $85K
Median home value$244K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+5% · CA 35%
ZIP population9,084
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Firebaugh Middle a good middle school?

Firebaugh Middle has a Scope Score of 37 out of 100, placing it in the 40th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,346 statewide. 6.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.7 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Firebaugh Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 21.2% of students at Firebaugh Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 15.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 971 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Firebaugh Middle rank in California?

Firebaugh Middle ranks #1,346 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 40th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Firebaugh Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Firebaugh Middle increases by 5.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Firebaugh Middle?

9.7% of students at Firebaugh Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Firebaugh Middle compare to other schools in Firebaugh?

Firebaugh Middle scores 37/100 (40th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 503 students. Use the schools in Firebaugh page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Firebaugh Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Firebaugh Middle in Firebaugh, 25.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Firebaugh Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (27.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 424 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
6.1%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 38th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+5.3pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
21.2%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 36th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
9.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.1%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 48th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
24.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 54th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61598%15%28%49%23%−23
Grade 71527%22%28%43%28%−19
Grade 81745%26%33%36%30%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61596%8%17%69%14%−21
Grade 71536%7%24%63%13%−21
Grade 81745%13%29%53%18%−14
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111742%18%62%18%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged42425.9%−5−12
Hispanic/Latino47327.1%−6−12
English Learners1002.0%−5−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Firebaugh Middle ←376.1%21.2%+5.34.1%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194769#62611.5%42.1%5.6%8.9%+17.8pp
20223237#13724.4%23.3%19.6%8.3%+9.0pp
20234050#10863.2%23.9%11.2%4.0%+16.1pp
20243235#14444.7%20.2%9.2%2.5%+11.8pp
20253740#13466.1%21.2%9.7%4.1%+5.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.2%10.6%+6.4pp
Male6.8%8.3%+1.5pp
Hispanic/Latino5.7%9.4%+3.7pp
Students with Disabilities13.3%13.8%+0.5pp
English Learners6.3%10.2%+3.9pp
Military-Connected3.8%3.7%-0.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.8%9.9%+4.1pp
All Students5.5%9.4%+3.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction