ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Arthur E. Mills Intermediate · Firebaugh

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate posts 26% meeting the standard and 8.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1191 P Street, 93622 (opens in new tab)·Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified·Firebaugh·Grades 3-5·511 students·87% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(559) 659-2317·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded8%21%
% Met+26%43%
Growth-2.6-2.9
Absence5.9%17.9%
Suspension0.0%1.6%
Scope Score
35
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #4,045 statewide

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 30th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “26% proficient” and call it done. Arthur E. Mills Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Firebaugh, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 5.9% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 45th to the 30th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 26% meet the standard today, versus 45% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%29%37%33%29%
Grade 444%27%29%31%24%
Grade 551%33%34%29%31%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 355%36%35%37%28%
Grade 435%16%26%26%25%
Grade 534%13%26%22%21%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

22%
71%
Grade 3 · 29% proficient
11%
14%
75%
Grade 4 · 25% proficient
12%
19%
69%
Grade 5 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 5.4pp across grades; the floor rises 1.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
8.3%
State 21.3%
13.0pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-2.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
26.3%
State 42.7%
16.3pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
5.9%
State 17.9%
12.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.0%
State 1.6%
1.6pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.2%
State 18.0%
0.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Arthur E. Mills Intermediate in Firebaugh, 25.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Arthur E. Mills Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 5.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 428 students tested.

All students at this school: 26% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 26%, district —, state 43%26%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 27%, district 26%, state 32%27% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 24%, district 24%, state 32%24% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 28%, district 28%, state 44%28% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 24%, district 24%, state 42%24% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 7%, state 11%10% · −16 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 9%, state 15%9% · −17 vs school
WhiteWhite: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +0.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 5.9%, district 10.2%, state 17.9%5.9% · −12.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.0%, district —, state 1.6%0.0% · −1.6pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–64.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Arthur E. Mills Intermediate
35/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 21:126:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience12.1 years
Fully credentialed79%
Intern / emergency permit12.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,570 – $118,888
Principal salary$128,215 – $143,829
Superintendent salary$222,001

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,166, CA average $14,815$20,166 · spent at this school
Federal share$530 per student

$530 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,442 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction53%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance16%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,063 per pupil
2019$14,021 per pupil
2018$14,738 per pupil
2017$13,865 per pupil
2016$13,589 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic96.1%
District 97.1% · CA 56.1%
White2.9%
District 2.2% · CA 19.9%
Black0.6%
District 0.3% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.4%
District 0.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 86.7% (23pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$48K · CA $85K
Median home value$244K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+5% · CA 35%
ZIP population9,084
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Arthur E. Mills Intermediate a good elementary school?

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 30th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,045 statewide. 8.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.0 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Arthur E. Mills Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 26.3% of students at Arthur E. Mills Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 18.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 990 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Arthur E. Mills Intermediate rank in California?

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate ranks #4,045 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 30th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Arthur E. Mills Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Arthur E. Mills Intermediate decreases by 2.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Arthur E. Mills Intermediate?

5.9% of students at Arthur E. Mills Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Arthur E. Mills Intermediate compare to other schools in Firebaugh?

Arthur E. Mills Intermediate scores 35/100 (30th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 511 students. Use the schools in Firebaugh page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Arthur E. Mills Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Arthur E. Mills Intermediate in Firebaugh, 25.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Arthur E. Mills Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 5.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 428 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
8.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 37th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-2.6pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
26.3%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 38th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
5.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 70th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.0%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31727%22%27%44%29%−14
Grade 416111%14%27%49%24%−21
Grade 516212%19%28%41%31%−17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31726%22%31%41%28%−18
Grade 41614%21%27%48%25%−17
Grade 516210%11%33%46%21%−14
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111626%17%57%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged42825.2%−5−13
Hispanic/Latino47628.2%−5−11
English Learners20010.0%+3−0
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Arthur E. Mills Intermediate ←358.3%26.3%−2.60.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194045#303216.4%45.3%4.8%1.8%-10.7pp
20222622#44907.5%25.5%25.8%0.2%-9.2pp
20233541#336910.8%31.1%11.4%0.8%-5.8pp
20243429#407910.3%29.6%4.5%0.0%-9.7pp
20253530#40458.3%26.3%5.9%0.0%-2.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.3%6.3%+1.0pp
Male4.2%4.7%+0.5pp
Hispanic/Latino4.5%4.6%+0.1pp
Students with Disabilities14.0%6.5%-7.5pp
English Learners3.8%2.8%-1.0pp
Homeless0.0%
Military-Connected2.7%2.6%-0.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4.8%5.8%+1.0pp
All Students4.7%5.5%+0.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction