ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Fair Oaks Ranch Community · Santa Clarita

Fair Oaks Ranch Community: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Fair Oaks Ranch Community posts 48% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4045
% Exceeded22%21%
% Met+48%43%
Growth-20.6-2.9
Absence14.3%17.9%
Suspension1.2%1.6%
Scope Score
40
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #3,199 statewide · #7 of 9 in Sulphur Springs Union

Fair Oaks Ranch Community scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “48% proficient” and call it done. Fair Oaks Ranch Community deserves a closer read. The school sits in Santa Clarita, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 70th to the 44th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 48% meet the standard today, versus 54% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 359%52%46%41%60%
Grade 457%61%40%49%46%
Grade 558%62%62%55%46%
Grade 655%41%54%56%66%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%44%58%54%60%
Grade 455%55%34%45%45%
Grade 546%42%43%42%32%
Grade 653%34%45%42%52%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

32%
27%
41%
Grade 3 · 59% proficient
25%
21%
54%
Grade 4 · 46% proficient
19%
27%
54%
Grade 5 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 13.0pp across grades; the floor slips 13.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
22.1%
State 21.3%
0.8pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-20.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
47.8%
State 42.7%
5.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.3%
State 17.9%
3.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.2%
State 1.6%
0.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.6%
State 18.0%
0.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Fair Oaks Ranch Community in Santa Clarita, 42.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Fair Oaks Ranch Community trails its district average for low-income students by 2.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 259 students tested.

All students at this school: 51% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 51%, district —, state 43%51%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 37%, district 40%, state 32%37% · −13 vs school
MaleMale: this school 49%, district 46%, state 42%49% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 52%, district 50%, state 44%52% · +2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 36%, district 39%, state 32%36% · −14 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 66%, district 61%, state 56%66% · +15 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 43%, district 46%, state 46%43% · −7 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 23%, district 21%, state 15%23% · −27 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 65%, district 67%, state 65%65% · +14 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 49%, district 34%, state 26%49% · −1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 64%, district 63%, state 56%64% · +13 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 20%, district 15%, state 11%20% · −31 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 54%, district 73%, state 72%54% · +4 vs school
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 8.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.3%, district 13.2%, state 17.9%14.3% · −3.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 1.6%1.2% · −0.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (21.7% vs 11.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.4%
TK/K21.7%

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 25:127:1
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience12.0 years
Fully credentialed91%
Intern / emergency permit2.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$53,664 – $109,942
Principal salary$145,916 – $0
Superintendent salary$293,045

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $14,077, CA average $14,815$14,077 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$103 per student

$103 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,826 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support8%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other4%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,331 per pupil
2019$11,418 per pupil
2018$11,201 per pupil
2017$10,732 per pupil
2016$10,471 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic49.9%
District 59.3% · CA 56.1%
Other18.5%
District 13.1% · CA 9.0%
White16.7%
District 18.3% · CA 19.9%
Black8.2%
District 5.3% · CA 4.8%
Asian6.7%
District 4.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 54.7% (9pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$118K · CA $85K
Median home value$757K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+33% · CA 35%
ZIP population46,869
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 866 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fair Oaks Ranch Community a good elementary school?

Fair Oaks Ranch Community has a Scope Score of 40 out of 100, placing it in the 44th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,199 statewide. 22.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Fair Oaks Ranch Community's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 47.8% of students at Fair Oaks Ranch Community met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 22.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 22.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 714 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Fair Oaks Ranch Community rank in California?

Fair Oaks Ranch Community ranks #3,199 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 44th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Fair Oaks Ranch Community getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Fair Oaks Ranch Community decreases by 20.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Fair Oaks Ranch Community?

14.3% of students at Fair Oaks Ranch Community are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Fair Oaks Ranch Community compare to other schools in Santa Clarita?

Fair Oaks Ranch Community scores 40/100 (44th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 866 students. Use the schools in Santa Clarita page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Fair Oaks Ranch Community serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Fair Oaks Ranch Community in Santa Clarita, 42.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Fair Oaks Ranch Community trails its district average for low-income students by 2.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 259 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
22.1%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 51th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-20.6pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 32th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
47.8%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 54th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.3%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 56th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 53th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312132%27%22%18%60%+16
Grade 410125%21%20%35%46%+1
Grade 513519%27%21%33%46%−2
Grade 613032%34%23%11%66%+20
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312123%36%26%15%60%+14
Grade 410115%30%31%25%45%+3
Grade 513519%13%23%45%32%−3
Grade 613030%22%26%22%52%+17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1113610%23%52%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged25942.5%−3+4
Hispanic/Latino22541.8%−2+3
White8667.4%+2+6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Fair Oaks Ranch Community ←4022.1%47.8%−20.61.2%
Golden Oak Community0.9 mi6030.5%59.1%+4.02.6%
Cedarcreek Elementary2.3 mi5726.4%51.6%−16.40.9%
Skyblue Mesa Elementary2.9 mi5519.7%44.8%+12.40.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195270#167027.1%54.1%9.3%1.8%-3.5pp
20224874#150323.4%52.7%22.1%1.9%+4.1pp
20234971#165125.2%47.4%19.5%0.7%+0.4pp
20245272#163124.4%47.8%15.3%1.5%+1.2pp
20254044#319922.1%47.8%14.3%1.2%-20.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.2%12.8%+4.6pp
Male10.2%15.3%+5.1pp
Asian3.7%6.9%+3.2pp
Black/African American5.7%16.4%+10.7pp
White5.2%3.5%-1.7pp
Hispanic/Latino13.5%18.0%+4.5pp
Two or More Races6.5%14.0%+7.5pp
Students with Disabilities13.0%23.8%+10.8pp
English Learners11.3%22.8%+11.5pp
Homeless21.1%17.6%-3.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.7%18.9%+5.2pp
All Students9.3%14.1%+4.8pp
Filipino0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction