Leona H. Cox Community Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Leona H. Cox Community posts 50% meeting the standard, and 22.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 22% | 50% | -0.4 | 16.5% | 2.6% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Leona H. Cox Community Elementary scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 64th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “50% proficient” and call it done. Leona H. Cox Community deserves a closer read. The school sits in Canyon Country, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Leona H. Cox Community's low-income kids hit 54.1% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 64th percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 50% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52% | 62% | 46% | 45% | 41% |
| Grade 4 | 58% | 53% | 62% | 44% | 67% |
| Grade 5 | 63% | 39% | 41% | 66% | 58% |
| Grade 6 | 67% | 60% | 54% | 64% | 66% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 48% | 63% | 54% | 45% | 45% |
| Grade 4 | 35% | 32% | 62% | 56% | 63% |
| Grade 5 | 36% | 25% | 15% | 45% | 26% |
| Grade 6 | 51% | 31% | 35% | 38% | 45% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 15.1pp across grades; the floor rises 17.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Leona H. Cox Community's most underrated number
54.1% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Leona H. Cox Community Elementary in Canyon Country, 54.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Leona H. Cox Community Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (52.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.9 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 148 students tested.
7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (25.2% vs 11.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$664 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 34% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Leona H. Cox Community Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Leona H. Cox Community Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Leona H. Cox Community Elementary rank in California?
Is Leona H. Cox Community Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Leona H. Cox Community Elementary?
How does Leona H. Cox Community Elementary compare to other schools in Canyon Country?
How does Leona H. Cox Community Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 60
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 57
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 59 | 17% | 24% | 32% | 27% | 41% | −3 |
| Grade 4 | 54 | 31% | 35% | 22% | 11% | 67% | +22 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 32% | 26% | 25% | 17% | 58% | +11 |
| Grade 6 | 61 | 34% | 31% | 18% | 16% | 66% | +19 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 60 | 18% | 27% | 30% | 25% | 45% | −1 |
| Grade 4 | 54 | 24% | 39% | 26% | 11% | 63% | +21 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 11% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 26% | −9 |
| Grade 6 | 62 | 24% | 21% | 31% | 24% | 45% | +10 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 53 | 11% | 23% | 66% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 148 | 54.1% | +9 | +16 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 140 | 52.1% | +8 | +13 |
| White | 15 | 86.7% | +21 | +25 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leona H. Cox Community Elementary ← | — | 48 | 22.4% | 50.0% | −0.4 | 2.6% |
| Plum Canyon Elementary | 1.9 mi | 64 | 37.9% | 65.1% | −4.5 | 0.4% |
| Golden Oak Community | 2.4 mi | 60 | 30.5% | 59.1% | +4.0 | 2.6% |
| Cedarcreek Elementary | 0.8 mi | 57 | 26.4% | 51.6% | −16.4 | 0.9% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 51 | 69 | #1729 | 25.5% | 48.6% | 9.6% | 1.9% | -0.8pp |
| 2022 | 28 | 28 | #4105 | 20.0% | 45.6% | 19.2% | 4.4% | -31.0pp |
| 2023 | 36 | 42 | #3332 | 19.6% | 46.5% | 23.5% | 5.9% | -22.2pp |
| 2024 | 46 | 60 | #2304 | 24.6% | 50.2% | 15.7% | 3.0% | +10.9pp |
| 2025 | 48 | 64 | #2090 | 22.4% | 50.0% | 16.5% | 2.6% | -0.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 8.2% | 18.5% | +10.3pp |
| Male | 10.8% | 14.4% | +3.6pp |
| Asian | 11.1% | 8.3% | -2.8pp |
| Black/African American | 18.2% | 30.8% | +12.6pp |
| White | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 10.0% | 16.7% | +6.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 10.0% | 27.3% | +17.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 11.9% | 21.2% | +9.3pp |
| English Learners | 10.0% | 14.5% | +4.5pp |
| Homeless | 10.5% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 12.1% | 20.2% | +8.1pp |
| All Students | 9.6% | 16.4% | +6.8pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction