ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
F. C. Joyce TK-8 · North Highlands

F. C. Joyce TK-8: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

F. C. Joyce TK-8 posts low test scores — and English learners here beat the state average for their group by 6 points in ELA. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

6050 Watt Avenue, 95660 (opens in new tab)·Twin Rivers Unified·North Highlands·Grades TK-8·537 students·94% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 566-1880·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3145
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+28%43%
Growth-9.7-2.9
Absence27.8%17.9%
Suspension6.1%1.6%
Scope Score
31
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,667 statewide · #18 of 35 in Twin Rivers Unified

F. C. Joyce TK-8 scores 31 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 19th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “28% proficient” and call it done. F. C. Joyce TK-8 deserves a closer read. The school sits in North Highlands, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 42nd to the 19th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 28% of students meet the standard today, above the 25% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 318%18%13%8%31%
Grade 424%8%12%20%30%
Grade 531%30%19%13%27%
Grade 627%18%15%27%40%
Grade 715%23%15%26%27%
Grade 822%8%25%25%37%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 319%14%25%22%35%
Grade 422%8%16%20%23%
Grade 534%11%9%9%21%
Grade 622%5%23%31%28%
Grade 78%15%3%10%15%
Grade 85%2%9%7%11%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

11%
20%
69%
Grade 3 · 31% proficient
11%
19%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
10%
17%
73%
Grade 5 · 27% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.7%
State 21.3%
10.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
27.8%
State 42.7%
14.9pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
27.8%
State 17.9%
9.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
6.1%
State 1.6%
4.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.8%
State 18.0%
11.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At F. C. Joyce TK-8 in North Highlands, 31.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. F. C. Joyce TK-8 trails its district average for low-income students by 3.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.5% Math proficient); English Learner students (16.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 337 students tested.

All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 43%27%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 30%, state 32%27% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 28%, district 30%, state 42%28% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 26%, district 33%, state 44%26% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 14%, district 13%, state 11%14% · −13 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 25%, district 30%, state 32%25% · −2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 23%, district 33%, state 72%23% · −4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 13%, district 10%, state 15%13% · −13 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 26%, district 23%, state 22%26% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 33%, district 39%, state 56%33% · +6 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 36%, district 33%, state 56%36% · +9 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 8.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +0.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 27.8%, district 28.4%, state 17.9%27.8% · +9.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.1%, district —, state 1.6%6.1% · +4.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–625.5%
Grades 7–826.7%
TK/K35.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
F. C. Joyce TK-8
31/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience12.1 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers4%
Intern / emergency permit4.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,947 – $124,659
Principal salary$147,324 – $164,332
Superintendent salary$378,049

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,065, CA average $14,815$18,065 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$736 per student

$736 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,643 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction54%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,626 per pupil
2019$14,054 per pupil
2018$14,648 per pupil
2017$12,954 per pupil
2016$12,405 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic35.8%
District 41.8% · CA 56.1%
Asian24.9%
District 12.7% · CA 10.2%
Other15.3%
District 11.0% · CA 9.0%
White14.2%
District 23.8% · CA 19.9%
Black9.9%
District 10.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 93.8% (30pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$68K · CA $85K
Median home value$356K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+12% · CA 35%
ZIP population35,451
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is F. C. Joyce TK-8 a good elementary school?

F. C. Joyce TK-8 has a Scope Score of 31 out of 100, placing it in the 19th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,667 statewide. 10.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are F. C. Joyce TK-8's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 27.8% of students at F. C. Joyce TK-8 met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 341 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does F. C. Joyce TK-8 rank in California?

F. C. Joyce TK-8 ranks #4,667 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 19th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is F. C. Joyce TK-8 getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at F. C. Joyce TK-8 decreases by 9.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at F. C. Joyce TK-8?

27.8% of students at F. C. Joyce TK-8 are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 6.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does F. C. Joyce TK-8 compare to other schools in North Highlands?

F. C. Joyce TK-8 scores 31/100 (19th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 537 students. Use the schools in North Highlands page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does F. C. Joyce TK-8 serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At F. C. Joyce TK-8 in North Highlands, 31.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. F. C. Joyce TK-8 trails its district average for low-income students by 3.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.5% Math proficient); English Learner students (16.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 337 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 40th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-9.7pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
27.8%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 39th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
27.8%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 34th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 13th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 36th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35411%20%22%46%31%−12
Grade 45411%19%19%52%30%−15
Grade 56010%17%17%57%27%−21
Grade 6689%31%24%37%40%−7
Grade 7565%21%36%38%27%−21
Grade 86010%27%22%42%37%−9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35415%20%19%46%35%−11
Grade 4569%14%23%54%23%−18
Grade 5638%13%17%62%21%−15
Grade 66910%17%32%41%28%−7
Grade 7610%15%21%64%15%−19
Grade 8615%7%28%61%11%−21
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111243%15%52%30%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged33731.8%−3−6
English Learners13216.7%+3+6
Hispanic/Latino12330.1%−6−9
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
F. C. Joyce TK-8 ←3110.7%27.8%−9.76.1%
Ridgepoint Elementary2.2 mi5225.9%50.3%+7.83.3%
Community Outreach Academy0.5 mi4314.5%37.0%−0.82.7%
Creative Connections Arts Academy1.8 mi4316.1%39.0%−6.45.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193942#320710.0%24.8%16.2%5.4%+14.1pp
20222829#40902.7%14.9%41.7%4.7%+4.3pp
20232512#50146.2%15.7%34.4%4.2%-5.0pp
20242814#49604.9%15.2%26.7%6.6%-3.9pp
20253119#466710.7%27.8%27.8%6.1%-9.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.4%27.4%+12.0pp
Male17.0%29.9%+12.9pp
Asian3.9%15.2%+11.3pp
Black/African American24.8%42.6%+17.8pp
Filipino25.0%28.0%+3.0pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino10.6%32.5%+21.9pp
Two or More Races20.5%33.3%+12.8pp
Students with Disabilities19.0%36.8%+17.8pp
English Learners8.2%21.7%+13.5pp
Homeless27.8%32.4%+4.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.8%28.7%+11.9pp
All Students16.3%28.7%+12.4pp
Pacific Islander41.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction